| Literature DB >> 35625657 |
Sameh A Korma1,2, Li Li1,3, Wei Wei4, Pengzhan Liu1, Xinghe Zhang4, Ibrahim A Bakry5, Peipei An1, Khaled A E Abdrabo1, Muhammad Faisal Manzoor1, Muhammad Umair6, Ilaria Cacciotti7, José M Lorenzo8,9, Carlos Adam Conte-Junior10.
Abstract
Goat milk (GM) is an excellent alternative to cow milk and has recently been used in commercial infant formula preparation due to its superior fat composition. Here, the fatty acid (FA) composition, triacylglycerol (TAG) molecular species, thermal behavior and infrared spectra of extracted milk fat from the milk of the two main breeds of dairy goat bred in China (Guanzhong GM (GZG) and Xinong Saanen GM (XSG)) are investigated. Gas chromatography, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry and ultra-performance convergence chromatography with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry are applied. The obtained results evidence significant fat compositional differences based on the breed that produced the considered GM. The major FAs in both GM fats were capric (C10:0), myristic (C14:0), palmitic (C16:0), stearic (C18:0) and oleic (C18:1 n-9c). GZG presented a higher content of medium-chain saturated FAs, while XSG had higher unsaturated FAs with higher ratios of L/Ln and n-6/n-3. A total of 339 and 359 TAGs were detected and quantified in GZG and XSG, and the major TAGs were those of m/z 740.6712 (14.10 ± 0.27%) and m/z 684.6094 (10.94 ± 0.02%), respectively. Milk TAGs of GZG and XSG showed 24-54 and 26-54 total acyl carbon numbers with a 0-4 and 0-5 double bond number at 68 and 72 various retention times, respectively. Thermal analysis showed that all GM fat samples melted below normal body temperature. Infrared spectra revealed higher absorption values of GZG milk fat. This study provides valuable information to the dairy industry sector about GM fat produced in China, assessing the appropriateness of Chinese GM fat to be applied in Chinese infant formula.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese dairy goat; UPCC-Q-TOF-MS; infant formula; infrared spectroscopy; lipid composition; thermal analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35625657 PMCID: PMC9138446 DOI: 10.3390/biom12050730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Fatty acid composition (peak area %) and the positional distribution (sn-2 and sn-1, 3) of fatty acid in goat milk fat samples detected using GC-FID.
| Fatty Acids | GZG * | XSG ** | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total FAs | Total FAs | |||||
| C4:0 | 1.05 ± 0.04 a | ND | 1.58 ± 0.06 a˗ | 1.30 ± 0.16 a | ND | 1.95 ± 0.24 a˗ |
| C6:0 | 1.77 ± 0.16 a | ND | 2.66 ± 0.24 a˗ | 1.86 ± 0.08 a | ND | 2.79 ± 0.12 a˗ |
| C8:0 | 2.44 ± 0.08 a | 1.23 ± 0.08 A | 3.05 ± 0.08 a˗ | 2.48 ± 0.01 a | 1.10 ± 0.08 A | 3.17 ± 0.03 a˗ |
| C10:0 | 10.36 ± 0.16 a | 9.77 ± 0.82 A | 10.66 ± 0.16 a˗ | 9.48 ± 0.09 b | 7.88 ± 0.01 B | 10.28 ± 0.14 a˗ |
| C11:0 | 0.08 ± 0.03 a | ND | 0.13 ± 0.04 a˗ | 0.09 ± 0.01 a | ND | 0.14 ± 0.01 a˗ |
| C12:0 | 4.67 ± 0.24 a | 5.83 ± 0.08 A | 4.09 ± 0.33 a˗ | 3.72 ± 0.02 b | 5.71 ± 0.02 A | 2.73 ± 0.03 b˗ |
| C13:0 | 0.40 ± 0.02 a | 0.71 ± 0.02 A | 0.25 ± 0.01 a˗ | 0.07 ± 0.01 b | 0.09 ± 0.01 B | 0.06 ± 0.01 b˗ |
| C14:0 | 11.99 ± 0.82 a | 18.76 ± 0.98 A | 8.61 ± 0.73 a˗ | 9.75 ± 0.09 b | 16.98 ± 0.82 A | 6.14 ± 0.27 b˗ |
| C14:1 n-5 c | 0.38 ± 0.02 a | 1.12 ± 0.08 | 0.01 ± 0.00 b˗ | 0.19 ± 0.01 b | ND | 0.29 ± 0.01 a˗ |
| C15:0 | 1.09 ± 0.04 a | 1.20 ± 0.16 A | 1.04 ± 0.02 a˗ | 0.70 ± 0.16 b | 0.97 ± 0.02 A | 0.57 ± 0.25 a˗ |
| C15:1 n-5 c | 0.48 ± 0.02 a | 0.61 ± 0.09 | 0.42 ± 0.02 a˗ | 0.24 ± 0.10 b | ND | 0.36 ± 0.01 b˗ |
| C16:0 | 31.40 ± 0.82 a | 34.11 ± 0.10 A | 30.05 ± 0.78 a˗ | 23.84 ± 0.82 b | 31.65 ± 0.80 B | 19.94 ± 0.82 b˗ |
| C16:1 n-7 c | 1.33 ± 0.02 a | 1.17 ± 0.02 A | 1.41 ± 0.03 a˗ | 1.11 ± 0.01 b | 1.14 ± 0.02 A | 1.09 ± 0.02 b˗ |
| C17:0 | 0.72 ± 0.03 b | 0.59 ± 0.02 B | 0.79 ± 0.04 b˗ | 0.98 ± 0.02 a | 1.09 ± 0.01 A | 0.93 ± 0.03 a˗ |
| C17:1 n-7 t | 0.41 ± 0.01 b | 0.55 ± 0.03 B | 0.35 ± 0.00 b˗ | 0.54 ± 0.02 a | 0.81 ± 0.08 A | 0.41 ± 0.02 a˗ |
| C18:0 | 6.61 ± 0.03 b | 5.86 ± 0.02 B | 6.99 ± 0.04 b˗ | 13.49 ± 0.82 a | 9.65 ± 0.09 A | 15.41 ± 1.27 a˗ |
| C18:1 n-9 c | 21.79 ± 0.98 b | 15.87 ± 0.82 B | 24.75 ± 1.06 b˗ | 27.18 ± 0.81 a | 20.86 ± 0.09 A | 30.34 ± 1.17 a˗ |
| C18:2 n-6 c | 2.54 ± 0.24 a | 2.69 ± 0.01 A | 2.47 ± 0.36 a˗ | 1.90 ± 0.08 b | 1.83 ± 0.02 B | 1.94 ± 0.11 a˗ |
| C18:3 n-6 c | ND | ND | ND | 0.30 ± 0.08 | ND | 0.45 ± 0.12 |
| C18:3 n-3 c | 0.64 ± 0.01 a | ND | 0.96 ± 0.01 a˗ | 0.32 ± 0.02 b | ND | 0.48 ± 0.02 b˗ |
| C20:0 | ND | ND | ND | 0.13 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.20 ± 0.01 |
| C20:4 n-6 c | 0.25 ± 0.02 a | ND | 0.38 ± 0.02 a˗ | 0.23 ± 0.02 a | ND | 0.35 ± 0.02 a˗ |
|
| ||||||
| ΣSC-SFAs | 2.82 ± 0.20 a | ND | 4.24 ± 0.31 a˗ | 3.16 ± 0.24 a | ND | 4.74 ± 0.37 a˗ |
| ΣMC-SFAs | 29.94 ± 1.35 a | 36.30 ± 1.98 A | 26.78 ± 1.03 a˗ | 25.59 ± 0.22 b | 31.76 ± 0.88 B | 22.51 ± 0.11 b˗ |
| ΣLC-SFAs | 39.82 ± 0.92 a | 41.76 ± 1.11 A | 38.86 ± 0.83 a˗ | 39.14 ± 0.16 a | 43.36 ± 0.88 A | 37.04 ± 0.21 b˗ |
| ΣSFAs | 72.58 ± 2.48 a | 78.06 ± 3.09 A | 69.88 ± 2.17 a˗ | 67.89 ± 0.62 a | 75.12 ± 1.76 A | 64.29 ± 0.05 b˗ |
| ΣUFAs | 27.82 ± 1.33 b | 22.01 ± 1.05 B | 30.74 ± 1.47 b˗ | 32.01 ± 0.96 a | 24.64 ± 0.20 A | 35.70 ± 1.34 a˗ |
| ΣMUFAs | 24.39 ± 1.06 b | 19.32 ± 1.04 B | 26.93 ± 1.07 b˗ | 29.26 ± 0.83 a | 22.81 ± 0.19 A | 32.49 ± 1.16 a˗ |
| ΣPUFAs | 3.43 ± 0.27 a | 2.69 ± 0.01 A | 3.80 ± 0.40 a˗ | 2.75 ± 0.13 b | 1.83 ± 0.02 B | 3.21 ± 0.19 a˗ |
| ΣOCS-FAs | 1.81 ± 0.07 a | 1.79 ± 0.19 A | 1.82 ± 0.02 a˗ | 1.68 ± 0.15 a | 2.06 ± 0.01 A | 1.49 ± 0.22 a˗ |
| ΣECS-FAs | 50.00 ± 1.67 a | 58.73 ± 1.90 A | 45.64 ± 1.55 a˗ | 47.08 ± 0.09 a | 58.28 ± 1.70 A | 41.48 ± 0.72 b˗ |
| Σn-6 | 2.79 ± 0.26 a | 2.69 ± 0.01 A | 2.84 ± 0.39 a˗ | 2.43 ± 0.15 a | 1.83 ± 0.02 B | 2.73 ± 0.21 a˗ |
| Σn-3 | 0.64 ± 0.01 a | ND | 0.96 ± 0.01 a˗ | 0.32 ± 0.02 b | ND | 0.48 ± 0.02 b˗ |
| n-6/n-3 | 4.35 ± 0.35 b | ND | 2.96 ± 0.37 b˗ | 7.64 ± 0.85 a | ND | 5.73 ± 0.74 a˗ |
| L/Ln | 3.96 ± 0.33 b | ND | 2.57 ± 0.35 b˗ | 5.97 ± 0.56 a | ND | 4.06 ± 0.45 a˗ |
* GZG: Guanzhong goat milk; ** XSG: Xinong Saanen goat milk. ¥ FA composition at sn-1, 3 positions was calculated as (3 × total FA˗sn-2)/2. C4:0, butyric acid (Bu); C6:0, caproic acid (Co); C8:0, caprylic acid (Cy); C10:0, capric acid (Ca); C11:0, undecanoic acid (Ud); C12:0, lauric acid (La); C13:0, tridecanoic acid (Tr); C14:0, myristic acid (M); C14:1 n-5c, myristoleic acid (Mo); C15:0, pentadecylic acid (Pe); C15:1 n-5c, pentadecenoic acid (Pen); C16:0, palmitic acid (P); C16:1 n-7c, palmitoleic acid (Po); C17:0, margaric acid (Ma); C17:1 n-7t, heptadecenoic acid (H); C18:0, stearic acid (S); C18:1 n-9c, oleic acid (O); C18:2 n-6c, linoleic acid (L); C18:3 n-6c, gamma-linolenic acid (Gln); C18:3 n-3c, alpha-linolenic acid (Ln); C20:0, arachidic acid (Ar); C20:4 n-6c, arachidonic acid (ARA). Results represent mean ± standard deviation, n = 3. Presented values with different lowercase letters (a, b), uppercase letters (A, B) and lowercase letters (a˗, b˗) in the same row denote significant differences in the FAs of the total, sn-2 and sn-1, 3 positions, respectively, as obtained by independent samples t-test (p ≤ 0.05). ND, not detected. ΣSC-SFAs, sum of short-chain saturated fatty acids (C4:0 + C6:0); ΣMC-SFAs, sum of medium-chain saturated fatty acids (C8:0 + C10:0 + C11:0 + C12:0 + C13:0 + C14:0); ΣLC-SFAs, sum of long-chain saturated fatty acids (C15:0 + C16:0 + C17:0 + C18:0 + C20:0); ΣSFAs, sum of saturated fatty acids (C4:0 + C6:0 + C8:0 + C10:0 + C11:0 + C12:0 + C13:0 + C14:0 + C15:0 + C16:0 + C17:0 + C18:0 + C20:0); ΣUFAs, sum of unsaturated fatty acids (C14:1 n-5c + C15:1 n-5c + C16:1 n-7c + C17:1 n-7t + C18:1 n-9c + C18:2 n-6c + C18:3 n-6c + C18:3 n-3c + C20:4 n-6c); ΣMUFAs, sum of monounsaturated fatty acids (one double bond, C14:1 n-5c + C15:1 n-5c + C16:1 n-7c + C17:1 n-7t + C18:1 n-9c); ΣPUFAs, sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids (two or more double bonds, C18:2 n-6c + C18:3 n-6c + C18:3 n-3c + C20:4 n-6c); ΣOCS-FAs, sum of odd chain saturated fatty acids (C15:0 + C17:0); ΣECS-FAs, sum of even chain saturated fatty acids (C14:0 + C16:0 + C18:0); Σn-6, sum of all n-6 fatty acids (C18:2 n-6c + C18:3 n-6c + C20:4 n-6c); Σn-3, sum of all n-3 fatty acids (C18:3 n-3c); n-6/n-3, the ratio between sum of all n-6 and sum of all n-3; L/Ln, the ratio between linoleic acid (C18:2 n-6c) and alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3c).
Figure 1Total ion current chromatograms of TAGs in goat milk fat samples at a collision energy of 35 V analyzed by UPCC-Q-TOF-MS with supercritical carbon dioxide as a mobile phase under the positive ion (ESI+) mode within 20 min: (A) Guanzhong goat milk, (B) Xinong Saanen goat milk.
Figure 2MS2 spectra and fragmentations of [M + NH4]+ for the most abundant TAGs identified in (A) Guanzhong goat milk fat, (B) Xinong Saanen goat milk fat at m/z 740.6712 and 684.6094, respectively, under the positive ion (ESI+) mode. Co, caproic acid (C6:0); Cy, caprylic acid (C8:0); Ca, capric acid (C10:0); La, lauric acid (C12:0); M, myristic acid (C14:0); P, palmitic acid (C16:0); S, stearic acid (C18:0); M + Na, molecular weight + sodium.
Figure 3(A) Saturation distribution of TAGs; (B) Molecular weight distribution of TAGs (>1% of total TAGs) presented as ACN:DB (acyl carbon number:number of double bonds). GZG, Guanzhong goat milk; XSG, Xinong Saanen goat milk. Results represent mean ± standard deviation (indicated by vertical error bars), n = 3. Columns bearing different letters indicate statistical difference (p ≤ 0.05) between the two goat dairy breeds by independent samples t-test.
Figure 4Melting (A) and crystallization (B) profiles of goat milk fat samples analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry. Guanzhong goat milk (GZG, black curve), Xinong Saanen goat milk (XSG, red curve).
Figure 5FT-IR spectra of goat milk fat samples fractions in the range of wavenumber 4000–500 cm−1; (A) Guanzhong goat milk (GZG); (B) Xinong Saanen goat milk (XSG).