| Literature DB >> 35621548 |
Mohammad Zubair Ahmed1, Anshul Gupta2, Musarrat Husain Warsi3, Ahmed M Abdelhaleem Ali3, Nazeer Hasan1, Farhan J Ahmad1, Ameeduzzafar Zafar4, Gaurav K Jain2,5.
Abstract
Vitamin D deficiency distresses nearly 50% of the population globally and multiple studies have highlighted the association of Vitamin D with a number of clinical manifestations, including musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and neurological disorders. In the current study, vitamin D oil-in-water (O/W) nanoemulsions were developed and incorporated in edible gummies to enhance bioavailability, stability, and patient compliance. The spontaneous emulsification method was employed to produce a nano-emulsion using corn oil with tween 20 and lecithin as emulsifiers. Optimization was carried out using pseudo-ternary phase diagrams and the average particle size and polydispersity index (PDI) of the optimized nanoemulsion were found to be 118.6 ± 4.3 nm and 0.11 ± 0.30, respectively. HPLC stability analysis demonstrated that the nano-emulsion prevented the degradation and it retained more than 97% of active vitamin D over 15 days compared to 94.5% in oil solution. Similar results were obtained over further storage analysis. Vitamin D gummies based on emulsion-based gelled matrices were then developed using gelatin as hydrocolloid and varying quantities of corn oil. Texture analysis revealed that gummies formulated with 10% corn oil had the optimum hardness of 3095.6 ± 201.7 g on the first day which remained consistent on day 45 with similar values of 3594.4 ± 210.6 g. Sensory evaluation by 19 judges using the nine-point hedonic scale highlighted that the taste and overall acceptance of formulated gummies did not change significantly (p > 0.05) over 45 days storage. This study suggested that nanoemulsions consistently prevent the environmental degradation of vitamin D, already known to offer protection in GI by providing sustained intestinal release and enhancing overall bioavailability. Soft chewable matrices were easy to chew and swallow, and they provided greater patient compliance.Entities:
Keywords: gelatin; gelled matrices; gummy; nanoemulsion; sensory evaluation; texture analysis; vitamin D
Year: 2022 PMID: 35621548 PMCID: PMC9140647 DOI: 10.3390/gels8050250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gels ISSN: 2310-2861
(A). Grading system of oil and Smix based on appearance and emulsification time. (B). Visual screening data of nano emulsions using different ratio of Smix and oil.
| A. Grade | Parameter | Self-Emulsion Time (min) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Rapid, clear nanoemulsion | <1 | |||
| 2. | Rapid, slight hazy nanoemulsion | <2 | |||
| 3. | Slow, turbid emulsion | >3 | |||
| 4. | No emulsification | >4 | |||
|
| |||||
|
|
| ||||
| 1:1 | 2:1 | 1:2 | 1:3 | 3:1 | |
| 10:3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 09:3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 08:3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 07:3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 06:3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 05:3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 04:3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 03:3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| 02:3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| 01:3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Figure 1Formulation development process from nano emulsion optimization to gummy formation.
Nano gummy formula with 10 wt. % corn oil.
| Ingredients | Amount (wt. %) |
|---|---|
| O/W nanoemulsion | 34.29 |
| Gelatin | 10.29 |
| Sorbitol | 13.20 |
| Xylitol | 30.79 |
| Sucralose | 0.38 |
| Citric acid | 0.38 |
| Lime flavor | 0.66 |
| Corn Oil | 10.00 |
Figure 2Comparative corn oil emulsification potential of various screened surfactants.
Figure 3Pseudo-ternary Phase diagram of optimized nano-emulsion with corn oil, Smix (tween 20 + lecithin; 2:1) and water.
Figure 4(A) HI-RES TEM micrograph of NE. (B) Particle size distribution of optimized NE.
Figure 5HPLC Chromatograph of (A) Standard solution (B) Test sample B.
Average retention area, retention time and peak height of stock solution.
| Concentration (µg/mL) | Average Area | Retention Time | Height | Area % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4,132,567 | 7.643 | 284,993 | 100 |
| 1 | 4,134,052 | 7.620 | 285,379 | 100 |
| 1 | 4,142,904 | 7.660 | 286,712 | 100 |
| 1 | 4,130,736 | 7.663 | 284,132 | 100 |
| 1 | 4,140,783 | 7.677 | 285,363 | 100 |
| Mean | 4,136,208.4 | 7.652 | 285,315.8 | 100 |
| Std. Dev. | 5329.52 | 0.022 | 930.21 | NA |
Concentration reduction and percent reduction of vitamin D on day 15 and 30.
| Test Day | Sample A (IU/mL) | % Reduction | Sample B (IU/mL) | % Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | 289,302.01 | 0 | 38,282.13 | 0 |
| Day 15 | 273,420.01 | 5.49 | 37,155.68 | 2.94 |
| Day 30 | 263,360.20 | 8.97 | 35,360.46 | 7.63 |
(A) Mean hardness value (Peak force (g) mean ± STDV) and (B) mean stickiness value (negative force (g) mean ± STDV) of each gummy on day 1, 15, 30 and 45.
| A. Mean Hardness Value (Peak Force (g) Mean ± STDV) of Each Gummy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil Content in Gummy | Day 1 | Day 15 | Day 30 | Day 45 |
| No corn oil | 1540 ± 125 | 1620 ± 100 | 2030 ± 150 | 1820 ± 155 |
| 10% corn oil | 3100 ± 200 | 3260 ± 155 | 3330 ± 165 | 3600 ± 210 |
| 20% corn oil | 3410 ± 265 | 3630 ± 230 | 3930 ± 195 | 3970 ± 265 |
| 40% corn oil | 4260 ± 165 | 4600 ± 185 | 5000 ± 205 | 4650 ± 195 |
|
| ||||
| No corn oil | 325 ± 45 | 400 ± 35 | 425 ± 60 | 550 ± 60 |
| 10% corn oil | 160 ± 20 | 180 ± 30 | 125 ± 25 | 145 ± 33 |
| 20% corn oil | 100 ± 15 | 85 ± 15 | 80 ± 7 | 85 ± 12 |
| 40% corn oil | 90 ± 14 | 80 ± 14 | 75 ± 9 | 76 ± 8 |
Figure 6Graphical representation of (A) peak hardness cum (B) peak stickiness of each gummy on day 1, 15, 30 and 45 and (C) force-time curve of 40% corn oil gummy on day 1.
Average scores from the sensory evaluation on Day 1 and day 45.
| Day 1 | Placebo Gummy | Nano Gummy | Marketed Gummy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taste | 7.1 ± 1.7 | 6.7 ± 1.6 | 7.3 ± 1.4 |
| Aroma | 7.4 ± 1.3 | 7.0 ± 0.8 | 5.4 ± 0.7 |
| Appearance/texture | 7.0 ± 0.6 | 6.8 ± 0.9 | 7.6 ± 1.2 |
| Overall liking | 6.9 ± 0.9 | 6.6 ± 0.8 | 7.2 ± 1.0 |
|
| |||
| Taste | 7.2 ± 1.4 | 6.6 ± 1.0 | 7.4 ± 0.7 |
| Aroma | 6.7 ± 0.7 | 6.4 ± 1.1 | 4.5 ± 0.6 |
| Appearance/texture | 7.1 ± 0.8 | 6.9 ± 1.2 | 7.4 ± 0.9 |
| Overall liking | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 7.3 ± 1.1 |