Objective: The objective of the current research was to prepare self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) for BCS class II drug, nilotinib to enhance its oral bioavailability.Methodology: Different types of excipients like oil, surfactant, and co-surfactant were evaluated for drug solubility. Among the screened excipients, Capryol 90, Transcutol HP, and Tween 80 were selected as oil, co-surfactant, and surfactant, respectively, to construct a ternary phase diagram to identify a homogenous mixture. Characterization performed for the prepared SMEDDS for its particle size/droplet size, emulsification time, phase separation, droplet morphology, in vitro drug release, and oral bioavailability. Results: Prepared SMEDDS showed the highest of 87% drug release in in vitro drug release experiment. SMEDDS drug release was superior over suspension formulation, which could be attributed to oil/surfactant ratios and particle size of the SMEDDS. The acquired pharmacokinetic parameters indicate that twofold increase in systemic exposure of SMEDDS compared with nilotinib suspension formulation. A similar twofold increase in relative oral bioavailability was also observed when compared SMEDDS formulation with suspension formulation. Delayed Tmax (time to reach peak plasma concentrations) was observed with SMEDDS over suspension formulation, which was evident by slow rate of absorption of nilotinib from SMEDDS. Conclusion: This research demonstrated that SMEDDS could be an effective approach to improve solubility and oral bioavailability for the BCS class II poorly soluble nilotinib.
Objective: The objective of the current research was to prepare self-micro-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) for BCS class II drug, nilotinib to enhance its oral bioavailability.Methodology: Different types of excipients like oil, surfactant, and co-surfactant were evaluated for drug solubility. Among the screened excipients, Capryol 90, Transcutol HP, and Tween 80 were selected as oil, co-surfactant, and surfactant, respectively, to construct a ternary phase diagram to identify a homogenous mixture. Characterization performed for the prepared SMEDDS for its particle size/droplet size, emulsification time, phase separation, droplet morphology, in vitro drug release, and oral bioavailability. Results: Prepared SMEDDS showed the highest of 87% drug release in in vitro drug release experiment. SMEDDS drug release was superior over suspension formulation, which could be attributed to oil/surfactant ratios and particle size of the SMEDDS. The acquired pharmacokinetic parameters indicate that twofold increase in systemic exposure of SMEDDS compared with nilotinib suspension formulation. A similar twofold increase in relative oral bioavailability was also observed when compared SMEDDS formulation with suspension formulation. Delayed Tmax (time to reach peak plasma concentrations) was observed with SMEDDS over suspension formulation, which was evident by slow rate of absorption of nilotinib from SMEDDS. Conclusion: This research demonstrated that SMEDDS could be an effective approach to improve solubility and oral bioavailability for the BCS class II poorly soluble nilotinib.
Entities:
Keywords:
BCS class II; Nilotinib; SMEDDS; characterization; oral bioavailability; rats