| Literature DB >> 35614135 |
Julie S Pedersen1, Marte O Rygg2, Karoline Chrøis3, Elahu G Sustarsic4, Zach Gerhart-Hines4, Nicolai J Wever Albrechtsen5,6,7, Reza R Serizawa8, Viggo B Kristiansen9, Astrid L Basse4, Astrid E B Boilesen9, Beth H Olsen10, Torben Hansen4, Lise Lotte Gluud2, Sten Madsbad11, Steen Larsen3,12, Flemming Bendtsen2,13, Flemming Dela3,14.
Abstract
Impaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in liver tissue has been hypothesised to contribute to the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It is unknown whether OXPHOS capacities in human visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) associate with NAFLD severity and how hepatic OXPHOS responds to improvement in NAFLD. In biopsies sampled from 62 patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery and nine control subjects without obesity we demonstrate that OXPHOS is reduced in VAT and SAT while increased in the liver in patients with obesity when compared with control subjects without obesity, but this was independent of NAFLD severity. In repeat liver biopsy sampling in 21 patients with obesity 12 months after bariatric surgery we found increased hepatic OXPHOS capacity and mitochondrial DNA/nuclear DNA content compared with baseline. In this work we show that obesity has an opposing association with mitochondrial respiration in adipose- and liver tissue with no overall association with NAFLD severity, however, bariatric surgery increases hepatic OXPHOS and mitochondrial biogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35614135 PMCID: PMC9132900 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30629-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 17.694
Citrate synthase activity and mtDNA/nDNA count in liver-, visceral adipose- and subcutaneous adipose tissue.
| Baseline | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAFL− | NAFL+ | NASH | CON | |
| Liver tissue | ||||
| Citrate synthase activity (µmol g−1 min−1) | 10.5 (7.5–12.4) | 10.9 (7.8–13.8) | 11.0 (7.7–12.6) | 13.2 (9.9–14.5) |
| mtDNA/nDNA count | 470 (421–520) | 479 (436–519) | 508 (463–531) | 536 (417–709) |
| Visceral adipose tissue | ||||
| mtDNA/nDNA count | 268 (248–308) | 267 (254–302) | 259 (218–287) | 292 (201–378) |
| Subcutaneous adipose tissue | ||||
| mtDNA/nDNA count | 235 (197–276) | 263 (215–285) | 239 (198–281) | 254 (229–276) |
Fig. 1Depiction of the experimental study set-up.
Liver tissue, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) were sampled from 62 patients undergoing surgery—Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 29) or sleeve gastrectomy (n = 33)—and stratified into three groups: 31 patients without liver steatosis (NAFL−); 16 patients with liver steatosis (NAFL+); and 15 patients with NASH (NASH). Nine normal weight control subjects without hepatic steatosis and who underwent planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy served as a control group (CON). Twenty-one patients with obesity underwent repeat liver biopsy 12 months after bariatric surgery. Fresh tissue from both timepoints underwent ex vivo, high-resolution respirometry (HRR) measurements in an Oxygraph, which measures tissue oxygen consumption and hence can determine mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes’ (I–IV) respiratory rates and maximal electron transport system capacity. Two separate sequential substrate-inhibitor (SUIT) protocols were applied in the tissue. SUIT P1, panel A: (1) Adding of glutamate and malate (GM) to reveal leak respiration through complex I (2) Adding of ADP (GMD) to initiate complex I linked oxidative respiratory process (3) Addition of a lipid (the fatty acid octanoyl carnitine) to assess complex II lipid respiratory capacity (GMOD) (4) Addition of the tricarboxylic acid cycle substrate succinate to achieve maximal input of electrons through both complex I and complex II and maximal coupled oxidative phosphorylation (GMOSD or OXPHOSmax) (5) testing of maximal electron transfer system capacity (ETS) by stepwise addition of a protonophore (FCCP) to reveal uncoupled respiration (E). Before addition of FCCP cytochrome C was added as a quality control to test mitochondrial membrane integrity. Suit P2 (only liver tissue), panel B (1) glutamate and malate (GM, leak) (2) adding of ADP (GMD) to initiate complex I linked oxidative respiratory process (3) Blocking of complex I by addition of rotenone followed by (4) addition of succinate to assess specific complex II respiration (5) blocking of electron transfer from complex III with antimycin A followed by (6) addition of the powerful stimulator N,N,N’,N’ -tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine (TMPD) and ascorbate to assess specific complex IV respiration. For further details of SUIT protocols, please see Methods and Supplementary Information. This figure was created with BioRender.com.
Fig. 2Mitochondrial respiratory rates in liver tissue at baseline.
a Mass-specific substrate-inhibitor protocol 1 (SUIT P1) O2 fluxes. c P1 fluxes adjusted to citrate synthase activity (CS). e P1 fluxes adjusted to mitochondrial DNA/nuclear DNA (mtDNA/nDNA). b Mass-specific substrate-inhibitor protocol 2 (SUIT P2) fluxes O2 fluxes. d P2 fluxes adjusted to CS. f P2 fluxes adjusted to mtDNA/nDNA. For details of SUIT protocols, please refer to Methods and Fig. 1. Data are median (horizontal line), interquartile range (boxes) and 10–90% percentile (error bars). P-values (two-sided) are Kruskal–Wallis pairwise comparison with correction for multiple comparison. Grey boxes; CON, blue boxes; NAFL−, yellow boxes; NAFL+, red boxes; NASH. SUIT P1: NAFL− n = 30, NAFL+ n = 13, NASH n = 13, CON n = 6. SUIT P2: NAFL− n = 26, NAFL+ n = 16, NASH = 12, CON, n = 7. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Specific n’s in each protocol and for each substrate and group are provided in the Source Data file.
Fig. 4P/E and RCR in tissue.
a P/E (OXPHOSmax/FCCP) in liver tissue, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT); b Respiratory control ratio (RCR), (GMD/GM) in liver tissue, VAT and SAT. P/E and RCR were significantly higher (P/E: P < 0.001, RCR P = 0.003) in VAT and SAT when compared with liver tissue. No significant differences in P/E and RCR were found among the four groups in the three tissues. Data are median (horizontal line), interquartile range (boxes) and 10–90% percentile (error bars). P-values (2-sided) are Kruskal–Wallis pairwise comparison with correction for multiple comparison. Grey boxes; CON (n < 10), blue boxes; NAFL−, yellow boxes; NAFL+, red boxes; NASH. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Specific n’s for each tissue and group are provided in the Source Data file.
Fig. 3Mitochondrial respiratory rates in visceral- and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT, respectively) at baseline.
a Mass-specific substrate-inhibitor protocol 1 (SUIT P1) visceral adipose tissue (VAT) fluxes. c P1 VAT fluxes adjusted to mtDNA/nDNA. b Mass-specific substrate-inhibitor P1 subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) fluxes. d P1 SAT fluxes adjusted to mtDNA/nDNA. e Adipocyte count per counting frame (0.4 mm2) in VAT and SAT, respectively. f Number of CD68+ macrophage per 100 adipocytes in VAT and SAT. Data are median (horizontal line), interquartile range (boxes) and 10–90% percentile (error bars). P-values (2-sided) are Kruskal–Wallis pairwise comparison with correction for multiple comparison. Grey boxes; CON, blue boxes; NAFL−, yellow boxes; NAFL+, red boxes; NASH. VAT: NAFL− n = 30, NAFL+ n = 12, NASH n = 14, CON n = 9. SAT: NAFL− n = 29, NAFL+ n = 13, NASH n = 14, CON n = 9. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Specific n’s for each substrate and group are provided in the Source Data file.
Clinical and biochemical characteristics at baseline vs. follow-up 12 months after bariatric surgery in 21 OBE study subjects.
| OBE baseline ( | OBE follow-up ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| NAFLD activity score | 3 (2–3.5) | 1 (0.5–2) | <0.001 |
| Steatosis grade | 0 (0–1) | 0 (0–0) | 0.08 |
| Inflammation grade | 1 (1–1) | 1 (0.5–1) | 0.035 |
| Ballooning grade | 1 (1–2) | 0 (0–0) | <0.001 |
| NAFL−/NAFL+/NASH | 13/6/2 | 18/3/0 | - |
| Age (years) | 44 (37–48) | NA | - |
| Sex (female/male) | 13/8 | NA | - |
| Type of surgery (SG/RYGB) | 13/8 | NA | - |
| Weight (kg) | 125 (116–137) | 90 (86–100) | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 43.3 (37.9–45.7) | 32.5 (27.3–37.5) | <0.001 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.86 (0.82–0.95) | 0.82 (0.78–0.88) | <0.001 |
| %EBWL | NA | 60 (47–84) | - |
| Total weight loss (kg) | NA | 32.7 (12.3–40.9) | - |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 126 (119–138) | 112 (103–129) | 0.005 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 84 (77–92) | 71 (65–82) | <0.001 |
| HR (bpm) | 71 (66–83) | 59 (50–70) | <0.001 |
| ALT (U/L) | 31 (25–39) | 23 (17–36) | 0.254 |
| AST (U/L) | 23 (18–34) | 24 (27–36 | 0.631 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 5.9 (5.5–6.4) | 5.3 (5.0–5.5) | <0.001 |
| C-peptide (pmol/L) | 1160 (979–1360) | 779 (652–846) | <0.001 |
| Fasting insulin (pmol/L) | 128 (101–178) | 59 (41–72) | 0.002 |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 35 (33–38) | 33 (32–36) | 0.002 |
| HOMA-IR | 4.4 (3.5–7.2) | 1.9 (1.4–2.4) | 0.002 |
| HsCRP (mg/L) | 4.4 (1.6–7.3) | 0.9 (0.4–2.0) | <0.001 |
| Adiponectin (ng/mL) | 5842 (4732–7695) | 11,979 (7827–13,689) | <0.001 |
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 45 (33–71) | 16 (7–33) | <0.001 |
| sCD163 (ng/mL) | 692 (603–749) | 589 (512–630) | 0.013 |
| sCD206 (ng/mL) | 336 (278–449) | 278 (227–433) | 0.018 |
| IL-1β (ng/mL) | 0.05 (0.03–0.08) | 0.04 (0.02–0.06) | 0.210 |
| IL-6 (ng/mL) | 0.96 (0.60–1.35) | 0.59 (0.34–0.84) | <0.001 |
| TNF-α (ng/mL) | 1.75 (1.47–2.28) | 1.93 (1.44–2.41) | 0.970 |
Data are presented as medians (IQR). P-values (2-sided) are Wilcoxon-signed rank test.
NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, SG sleeve gastrectomy, RYGB Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, BMI body mass index, %EBWL percentage excess body weight loss, mmHg millimetres of mercury, HR heart rate, bpm beats per minute, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, HOMA-IR Homoeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance, HsCRP high-sensitivity C-reactive Protein, CD163 soluble cluster of differentiation 163, sCD206 soluble cluster of differentiation 206, IL-1β interleukin 1 beta, IL-6 interleukin 6, TNF-α tumour necrosis factor alpha.
Fig. 5Mitochondrial respiratory rates in liver tissue obtained from 21 patients with obesity during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery or sleeve gastrectomy (baseline) and again by Tru-Cut percutaneous liver biopsy twelve months later.
a Mass-specific substrate-inhibitor protocol 1 (P1) fluxes. b mass-specific protocol 2 (P2) fluxes; (GMD/GM). c P1 fluxes adjusted to mtDNA/nDNA. d P2 fluxes adjusted to mtDNA/nDNA. e P/E (OXPHOSmax/FCCP). f Respiratory control ratio (RCR), (GMD/GM) This patient cohort consisted of NAFL+ (n = 6), NAFL− (n = 13) and NASH (n = 2) (based on their baseline liver biopsy). CONs (baseline) are also shown. No statistically significant differences were found between CONs and OBE 12 months after surgery. P1 and P2 were performed as described in Fig. 1 and Methods. Data are median (horizontal line), interquartile range (boxes) and 10–90% percentile (error bars). P-values (2-sided) are Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Orange boxes; OBE baseline, green boxes; OBE 12 months after surgery, grey boxes (dimmed); CON (n < 10) at baseline. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Specific n’s in each protocol and for each substrate, group and timepoint are provided in the Source Data file.
Fig. 6Mitochondrial DNA/nuclear DNA content in hepatic tissue from the 21 patients with obesity at baseline and 12 months later.
a spaghetti plot. b median mtDNA/nDNA at the two timepoints. CONs (baseline) are also shown. No statistically significant differences were found between CONs and OBE 12 months after surgery. Data are median (horizontal line), interquartile range (boxes) and 10–90% percentile (error bars). P-values (2-sided) are Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Orange boxes; OBE baseline, green boxes; OBE 12 months after surgery, grey boxes (dimmed); CON (n < 10) at baseline. Specific n’s in each protocol and for each substrate and timepoint are provided in the Source Data file.
Clinical, anthropometrical and biochemical characteristics at baseline in patients with obesity (stratified by NAFLD severity) and normal weight control subjects undergoing bariatric surgery and cholecystectomy, respectively.
| Baseline | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with obesity according to histology | Controls | |||
| NAFL− ( | NAFL+ ( | NASH ( | CON | |
| Liver histology | ||||
| NAFLD activity score | 2 (2–3) | 3 (3–4) | 5 (5–5)‡‡‡,§§ | 1 (0.5–1.5)§§,††† |
| Steatosis | 0 (0–0) | 1 (1–1)‡‡‡ | 2 (1–2)‡‡‡ | 0 (0–0)§§§,††† |
| Inflammation | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–1) | 2 (1–2)‡ | 1 (0.5–1)# |
| Ballooning | 1 (1–1) | 1 (1–1.75) | 2 (2–2)‡‡,§ | 0 (0–0.5)‡‡,§§,††† |
| Age (years) | 44 (36–51) | 45 (40–52) | 44 (41–53) | 39 (34–43) |
| Female (%) | 25 (81) | 8 (50) | 8 (53) | 7 (78) |
| RYGB (%)/SG | 12 (39)/19 | 12 (75)/4 | 5 (33)/10 | 0 |
| Diabetes (%) | 2 (5) | 5 (31) | 8 (53)a | 0 |
| Hypertension (%) | 8 (26) | 6 (37) | 5 (33) | 0 |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 5 (16) | 6 (38) | 6 (40) | 0 |
| Weight (kg) | 121 (105–134) | 136 (118–168) | 127 (110–132) | 70 (62–80)‡‡‡,§§§,††† |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 41.6 (37.1–45.2) | 45.6 (39.1–52.9) | 41.6 (35.4–47.1) | 24.5 (22.3–26.4)‡‡‡,§§§,††† |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.83 (0.80–0.94) | 0.90 (0.87–0.95) | 0.97 (0.90–1.04) ‡‡‡ | 0.84 (0.75–0.90)†† |
| ALT (U/L) | 26 (20–31) | 27 (22–39) | 32 (30–52) ‡,§ | 19 (18–27)†† |
| AST (U/L) | 23 (20–28) | 21 (18–30) | 27 (20–30) | 20 (17–26) |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 5.8 (5.5–6.1) | 6.4 (5.5–8.4) | 6.5 (6.2–7.0) ‡ | 5.3 (5.2–6.0)§,†† |
| C-peptide (pmol/L) | 1050 (922–1270) | 1280 (1060–1410) | 1655 (1270–2112)‡‡ | 863 (650–921)§§,††† |
| Fasting insulin (pmol/L) | 104 (84–143) | 116 (103–172) | 191 (147–231)‡‡,§ | 64 (47–96)††† |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 35.0 (33.0–38.0) | 37.0 (35.0–50.0) | 37.5 (35.5–40.0) | 33 (29–34.5)§,†† |
| HOMA-IR | 4.0 (2.9–5.4) | 5.3 (4.4–6.4) | 7.8 (6.2–10.0)‡‡‡,## | 2.1 (1.6–3.5)§,††† |
| HsCRP (mg/L) | 4.4 (1.6–7.4) | 6.8 (4.2–12.0) | 3.6 (2.3–7.8) | 0.9 (0.7–2.9)‡,§§§,† |
| Adiponectin (ng/mL) | 6463 (4830–8781) | 4936 (4487–6056) | 5255 (2943–6307) | 9327 (4021–12630) |
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 50 (27–99) | 50 (31–80) | 26 (18–60) | 13 (8–21)‡‡‡,§§§ |
| sCD163 (ng/mL) | 687 (571–758) | 651 (592–705) | 759 (664–915) | 556 (492–618)‡,††† |
| sCD206 (ng/mL) | 325 (241–424) | 394 (329–497) | 378 (315–440) | 256 (214–510) |
| IL-1β (ng/mL) | 0.05 (0.02–0.07) | 0.07 (0.03–0.10) | 0.02 (0.01–0.04)§§ | 0.02 (0.02–0.05) |
| IL-6 (ng/mL) | 0.94 (0.60–1.38) | 1.07 (0.86–1.50) | 1.00 (0.91–1.45) | 0.62 (0.25–1.18) |
| TNF-α (ng/mL) | 1.97 (1.59–2.34) | 2.12 (1.77–2.50) | 1.97 (1.59–2.10) | 1.71 (1.16–2.43) |
Data are presented as medians (IQR). P-values (2-sided) are Kruskal–Wallis with correction for multiple comparison or Chi Square test.
NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, RYGB Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, SG sleeve gastrectomy, BMI body mass index, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, HOMA-IR Homoeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance, HsCRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, sCD163 soluble cluster of differentiation 163, sCD206 soluble cluster of differentiation 206, IL-1β interleukin 1 beta, IL-6 interleukin 6, TNF-α tumour necrosis factor alpha.
‡, ‡‡, ‡‡‡ denotes statistical significance (P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively) compared with NAFL−.
§, §§, §§§ denotes statistical significance (P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively) compared with NAFL+.
†, ††, ††† denotes statistical significance (P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively) compared with NASH.
#P = 0.052 compared with NASH.
##P = 0.057 compared with NAFL+.
aDenotes significantly more study subjects with type 2 diabetes in the NASH group.