Literature DB >> 35601968

Assessing mobility in primary brain tumor patients: A descriptive feasibility study using two established mobility tests.

James L Rogers1, Julianie De La Cruz Minyety1, Elizabeth Vera1, Alvina A Acquaye1, Samuel S Payén2, Jeffrey S Weinberg3, Terri S Armstrong1, Shiao-Pei S Weathers4.   

Abstract

Background: Patients with primary brain tumors (PBT) face significant mobility issues related to their disease and/or treatment. Here, the authors describe the preliminary utility and feasibility of two established mobility measures, the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) and Five-Times Sit-to-Stand (TSS) tests, in quickly and objectively assessing the mobility status of PBT patients at a single institution's neuro-oncology clinic.
Methods: Adult patients undergoing routine PBT care completed the TUG/TSS tests and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor module (MDASI-BT), which assessed symptom burden and interference with daily life, during clinic visits over a 6-month period. Research staff assessed feasibility metrics, including test completion times/rates, and collected demographic, clinical, and treatment data. Mann-Whitney tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Spearman's rho correlations were used to interrogate relationships between TUG/TSS test completion times and patient characteristics.
Results: The study cohort included 66 PBT patients, 59% male, with a median age of 47 years (range: 20-77). TUG/TSS tests were completed by 62 (94%) patients. Older patients (P < .001) and those who were newly diagnosed (P = .024), on corticosteroids (P = .025), or had poor (≤80) KPS (P < .01) took longer to complete the TUG/TSS tests. Worse activity-related (work, activity, and walking) interference was associated with longer TUG/TSS test completion times (P < .001). Conclusions: The TUG/TSS tests are feasible for use among PBT patients and may aid in clinical care. Older age, being newly diagnosed, using corticosteroids, poor (≤80) KPS, and high activity-related interference were associated with significant mobility impairment, highlighting the tests' potential clinical utility. Future investigations are warranted to longitudinally explore feasibility and utility in other practice and disease settings. Published by Oxford University Press 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical cancer research; clinical observations; mobility assessment; symptoms

Year:  2022        PMID: 35601968      PMCID: PMC9113321          DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurooncol Pract        ISSN: 2054-2577


  53 in total

1.  Recovery of the sit-to-stand movement after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Wim Janssen; Johannes Bussmann; Ruud Selles; Peter Koudstaal; Gerard Ribbers; Henk Stam
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Psychometric Properties of Activity, Self-Efficacy, and Quality-of-Life Measures in Individuals with Parkinson Disease.

Authors:  Vanina Dal Bello-Haas; Laura Klassen; M Suzanne Sheppard; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Clinical course of adult patients with ependymoma: results of the Adult Ependymoma Outcomes Project.

Authors:  Terri S Armstrong; Elizabeth Vera-Bolanos; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  An investigation of the validity of six measures of physical function in people awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee.

Authors:  Stephen D Gill; Natalie A de Morton; Helen Mc Burney
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Assessment of physical functioning in recurrent glioma: preliminary comparison of performance status to functional capacity testing.

Authors:  Lee W Jones; Rachel-Rose Cohen; Stephanie K Mabe; Miranda J West; Annick Desjardins; James J Vredenburgh; Allan H Friedman; David A Reardon; Emily Waner; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Reliability of performance-based measures in people awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee.

Authors:  Stephen Gill; Helen McBurney
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2008-09

7.  Using the Timed Up & Go test in a clinical setting to predict falling in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Joe R Nocera; Elizabeth L Stegemöller; Irene A Malaty; Michael S Okun; Michael Marsiske; Chris J Hass
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  Rehabilitation of motor dysfunction in primary brain tumor patients.

Authors:  David S Kushner; Christina Amidei
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2015-06-03

9.  Physical functional capacity of patients with glioma prior to adjuvant radiation: preliminary descriptive study.

Authors:  Ali Dulfikar; Eng-Siew Koh; Zarnie Lwin; Elizabeth Hovey; Haryana Dhillon; Jesica Arundell; Elizabeth Pinkham; Mark B Pinkham; Justin Holland; Gabriel Trajano; Fiona Naumann
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2021-02-22

10.  Provider-reported challenges and barriers to referring patients to neuro-oncology clinical trials: a report from the Society for Neuro-Oncology member survey.

Authors:  James L Rogers; Alvina Acquaye; Elizabeth Vera; Amanda Bates; Patrick Y Wen; Terri S Armstrong
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2019-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.