Literature DB >> 19212703

Assessment of physical functioning in recurrent glioma: preliminary comparison of performance status to functional capacity testing.

Lee W Jones1, Rachel-Rose Cohen, Stephanie K Mabe, Miranda J West, Annick Desjardins, James J Vredenburgh, Allan H Friedman, David A Reardon, Emily Waner, Henry S Friedman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Performance status (PS) scoring systems are tools of immense clinical importance in the management of patients with malignant disease but these tools are subjective and do not provide an objective evaluation of physical functioning. We conducted a pilot study to explore the feasibility and clinical utility of functional capacity testing to assess physical functioning in recurrent primary malignant glioma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, consecutive patients with recurrent glioma performed a six minute walk (6MW) test to assess functional capacity. Performance status was assessed using Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scoring system. QOL was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain scale. Self-reported exercise behavior was assessed using the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ).
RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were recruited and tested. Seventy percent were diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (WHO grade IV) and 85% were undergoing therapy. Median KPS was 90% (range, 70-100%). Median 6MW distance was 400 m (range, 102-630 m), equivalent to 56 +/- 13% (range, 14-87%) of that predicted for age and sex. KPS, self-reported exercise, and QOL increased across 6MW distance quartiles (P < 0.05) although there was considerable variation within each category. 6MW distance and KPS were significantly correlated with each other (r = 0.34, P < 0.01) and several QOL domains (range, r = -0.43 to 0.46, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: 6MW distance is a clinically feasible tool that provides an objective measure of physical functioning in select patients with recurrent glioma. Further research is required to investigate the prognostic value of these tests in patients with advanced malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19212703     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-009-9803-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  39 in total

1.  The Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool: further development and validation for use in palliative care.

Authors:  T Kaasa; J Wessel
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.250

2.  ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  The distance-saturation product predicts mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Christopher J Lettieri; Steven D Nathan; Robert F Browning; Scott D Barnett; Shahzad Ahmad; Andrew F Shorr
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 3.415

Review 4.  Cardiorespiratory exercise testing in clinical oncology research: systematic review and practice recommendations.

Authors:  Lee W Jones; Neil D Eves; Mark Haykowsky; Anil A Joy; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Self-reported comprehensive health status of adult brain tumor patients using the Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  A C Whitton; H Rhydderch; W Furlong; D Feeny; R D Barr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system.

Authors:  S B Yellen; D F Cella; K Webster; C Blendowski; E Kaplan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  The 6-min walk distance, peak oxygen uptake, and mortality in COPD.

Authors:  Claudia G Cote; Victor Pinto-Plata; Kyra Kasprzyk; Luis J Dordelly; Bartolome R Celli
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials.

Authors:  W J Curran; C B Scott; J Horton; J S Nelson; A S Weinstein; A J Fischbach; C H Chang; M Rotman; S O Asbell; R E Krisch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-05-05       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Prognostic value of health-related quality-of-life data in predicting survival in patients with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, from a phase III EORTC brain cancer group study.

Authors:  Murielle E L Mauer; Martin J B Taphoorn; Andrew Bottomley; Corneel Coens; Fabio Efficace; Marc Sanson; Alba A Brandes; Carin C D van der Rijt; Hans J J A Bernsen; Marc Frénay; Cees C Tijssen; Denis Lacombe; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Training and exercise to drive poststroke recovery.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Neurol       Date:  2008-02
View more
  24 in total

1.  Strength of skeletal muscle and self-reported physical performance in Austrian glioblastoma-patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Keilani; Christoph Krall; Christine Marosi; Birgit Flechl; Karin Dieckmann; Georg Widhalm; Maximilian Marhold; Richard Crevenna
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Predictors of functional capacity in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Murat Tomruk; Didem Karadibak; Tuğba Yavuzşen; Tülay Akman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Changes in functional performance measures in adults undergoing chemoradiation for primary malignant glioma: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Lee W Jones; Marina Mourtzakis; Katherine B Peters; Allan H Friedman; Miranda J West; Stephanie K Mabe; William E Kraus; Henry S Friedman; David A Reardon
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-05-18

Review 4.  The FDA NIH Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools (BEST) resource in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Daniel N Cagney; Joohee Sul; Raymond Y Huang; Keith L Ligon; Patrick Y Wen; Brian M Alexander
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Prognostic significance of functional capacity and exercise behavior in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lee W Jones; Whitney E Hornsby; Amy Goetzinger; Lindsay M Forbes; Emily L Sherrard; Morten Quist; Amy T Lane; Miranda West; Neil D Eves; Margaret Gradison; April Coan; James E Herndon; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 6.  Clinical outcome assessment in malignant glioma trials: measuring signs, symptoms, and functional limitations.

Authors:  Jaishri O Blakeley; Stephen Joel Coons; John R Corboy; Nancy Kline Leidy; Tito R Mendoza; Jeffrey S Wefel
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Quantitative assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness, skeletal muscle function, and body composition in adults with primary malignant glioma.

Authors:  Lee W Jones; Allan H Friedman; Miranda J West; Stephanie K Mabe; Jennifer Fraser; William E Kraus; Henry S Friedman; Maura I Tresch; Nancy Major; David A Reardon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Predicting distress among people who care for patients living longer with high-grade malignant glioma.

Authors:  B Russell; A Collins; A Dowling; M Dally; M Gold; M Murphy; J Burchell; J Philip
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Illness intrusiveness and subjective well-being in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Kim Edelstein; Linda Coate; Christine Massey; Natalie C Jewitt; Warren P Mason; Gerald M Devins
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Comparison of performance status with peak oxygen consumption in operable patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Roman; Graeme J Koelwyn; Neil D Eves; Whitney E Hornsby; Dorothy Watson; James E Herndon Ii; Leslie Kohman; Gregory Loewen; Lee W Jones
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.424

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.