BACKGROUND: Performance status (PS) scoring systems are tools of immense clinical importance in the management of patients with malignant disease but these tools are subjective and do not provide an objective evaluation of physical functioning. We conducted a pilot study to explore the feasibility and clinical utility of functional capacity testing to assess physical functioning in recurrent primary malignant glioma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, consecutive patients with recurrent glioma performed a six minute walk (6MW) test to assess functional capacity. Performance status was assessed using Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scoring system. QOL was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain scale. Self-reported exercise behavior was assessed using the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ). RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were recruited and tested. Seventy percent were diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (WHO grade IV) and 85% were undergoing therapy. Median KPS was 90% (range, 70-100%). Median 6MW distance was 400 m (range, 102-630 m), equivalent to 56 +/- 13% (range, 14-87%) of that predicted for age and sex. KPS, self-reported exercise, and QOL increased across 6MW distance quartiles (P < 0.05) although there was considerable variation within each category. 6MW distance and KPS were significantly correlated with each other (r = 0.34, P < 0.01) and several QOL domains (range, r = -0.43 to 0.46, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 6MW distance is a clinically feasible tool that provides an objective measure of physical functioning in select patients with recurrent glioma. Further research is required to investigate the prognostic value of these tests in patients with advanced malignancy.
BACKGROUND: Performance status (PS) scoring systems are tools of immense clinical importance in the management of patients with malignant disease but these tools are subjective and do not provide an objective evaluation of physical functioning. We conducted a pilot study to explore the feasibility and clinical utility of functional capacity testing to assess physical functioning in recurrent primary malignant gliomapatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, consecutive patients with recurrent glioma performed a six minute walk (6MW) test to assess functional capacity. Performance status was assessed using Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scoring system. QOL was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain scale. Self-reported exercise behavior was assessed using the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ). RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were recruited and tested. Seventy percent were diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (WHO grade IV) and 85% were undergoing therapy. Median KPS was 90% (range, 70-100%). Median 6MW distance was 400 m (range, 102-630 m), equivalent to 56 +/- 13% (range, 14-87%) of that predicted for age and sex. KPS, self-reported exercise, and QOL increased across 6MW distance quartiles (P < 0.05) although there was considerable variation within each category. 6MW distance and KPS were significantly correlated with each other (r = 0.34, P < 0.01) and several QOL domains (range, r = -0.43 to 0.46, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 6MW distance is a clinically feasible tool that provides an objective measure of physical functioning in select patients with recurrent glioma. Further research is required to investigate the prognostic value of these tests in patients with advanced malignancy.
Authors: Christopher J Lettieri; Steven D Nathan; Robert F Browning; Scott D Barnett; Shahzad Ahmad; Andrew F Shorr Journal: Respir Med Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: W J Curran; C B Scott; J Horton; J S Nelson; A S Weinstein; A J Fischbach; C H Chang; M Rotman; S O Asbell; R E Krisch Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-05-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Murielle E L Mauer; Martin J B Taphoorn; Andrew Bottomley; Corneel Coens; Fabio Efficace; Marc Sanson; Alba A Brandes; Carin C D van der Rijt; Hans J J A Bernsen; Marc Frénay; Cees C Tijssen; Denis Lacombe; Martin J van den Bent Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mohammad Keilani; Christoph Krall; Christine Marosi; Birgit Flechl; Karin Dieckmann; Georg Widhalm; Maximilian Marhold; Richard Crevenna Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Lee W Jones; Marina Mourtzakis; Katherine B Peters; Allan H Friedman; Miranda J West; Stephanie K Mabe; William E Kraus; Henry S Friedman; David A Reardon Journal: Oncologist Date: 2010-05-18
Authors: Daniel N Cagney; Joohee Sul; Raymond Y Huang; Keith L Ligon; Patrick Y Wen; Brian M Alexander Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Lee W Jones; Whitney E Hornsby; Amy Goetzinger; Lindsay M Forbes; Emily L Sherrard; Morten Quist; Amy T Lane; Miranda West; Neil D Eves; Margaret Gradison; April Coan; James E Herndon; Amy P Abernethy Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Jaishri O Blakeley; Stephen Joel Coons; John R Corboy; Nancy Kline Leidy; Tito R Mendoza; Jeffrey S Wefel Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Lee W Jones; Allan H Friedman; Miranda J West; Stephanie K Mabe; Jennifer Fraser; William E Kraus; Henry S Friedman; Maura I Tresch; Nancy Major; David A Reardon Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: B Russell; A Collins; A Dowling; M Dally; M Gold; M Murphy; J Burchell; J Philip Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kim Edelstein; Linda Coate; Christine Massey; Natalie C Jewitt; Warren P Mason; Gerald M Devins Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Michael A Roman; Graeme J Koelwyn; Neil D Eves; Whitney E Hornsby; Dorothy Watson; James E Herndon Ii; Leslie Kohman; Gregory Loewen; Lee W Jones Journal: Respirology Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 6.424