Literature DB >> 3559578

Survivorship analysis in the evaluation of joint replacement.

F Dorey, H C Amstutz.   

Abstract

A major problem in the evaluation of patients receiving joint replacements is the lack of complete information on all patients. That is, at the time of analysis patients will not have been followed long enough to know what their status will be at the time point of interest (5 years, for example). The statistical technique of survivorship analysis is the appropriate method for evaluating this type of data. The authors illustrate the technique of survivorship analysis as it applies to total joint arthroplasty, using examples from the UCLA total hip arthroplasty data base. In addition, the benefits of using this technique over the usual "failure rate" analysis are discussed, as well as other issues concerning the analysis of joint replacement data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3559578     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(86)80010-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  A scoring system to determine radiological loosening in cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D M Dall; I D Learmonth; M Solomon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Long-term results for minor column allografts in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul T H Lee; Guy Raz; Oleg A Safir; David J Backstein; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James B Stiehl; Karel J Hamelynck; Paul E Voorhorst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; Susan M Odum; John L Masonis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Long-term results of Charnley low friction arthroplasty in patients younger than 40.

Authors:  B Chamberiin; L Kerboull; M Kerboull
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-10

6.  Survival analysis of an uncemented ceramic acetabular component in total hip replacement.

Authors:  K Knahr; M Böhler; P Frank; H Plenk; M Salzer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1987

7.  Revision hip arthroplasty: infection is the most common cause of failure.

Authors:  S Mehdi Jafari; Catelyn Coyle; S M Javad Mortazavi; Peter F Sharkey; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Total joint arthroplasty in a predominantly African-American population. Part two: Hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  E A Rankin; S R Parker
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  THA with Delta ceramic on ceramic: results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial.

Authors:  William G Hamilton; James P McAuley; Douglas A Dennis; Jeffrey A Murphy; Thomas J Blumenfeld; Joel Politi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Factors influencing the revision rate of Zweymueller acetabular cup.

Authors:  H Effenberger; T Ramsauer; U Dorn; M Imhof
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.