Literature DB >> 35590078

Transtympanic soft tissue tympanoplasty can replace conventional techniques elevating tympanic membranes.

Jungho Ha1,2, Hantai Kim3,2, Jeong Hun Jang1, Hun Yi Park1, Yun-Hoon Choung4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Most traditional tympanoplasties require elevating the tympanic membrane (TM). These techniques are rather complicated and success rates are not perfect. Therefore, the authors developed a novel technique, transtympanic soft tissue (TST) tympanoplasty, which does not require raising eardrums, and evaluated its surgical efficiency compared to perichondrium underlay (PU) tympanoplasty. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study was conducted in a single center.
METHODS: 152 cases who underwent TST tympanoplasty (n = 70) or PU tympanoplasty (n = 82) between 2011 and 2020 were included in the study. Perforation location, pure tone audiometry, complications, and closure rates were analyzed according to the size of the TM perforations: moderate perforation (25-40%, n = 100) and large perforation (≥ 40%, n = 52).
RESULTS: For the moderate perforations, the closure rates of the TST (n = 45) and PU (n = 55) groups were 93.3% and 89.1%, respectively (p = 0.461), and even for the large perforations, the success rates were 88.0% in the TST group (n = 25) and 81.5% in the PU group (n = 27) (p = 0.515). The mean postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) values of the TST group for moderate and large perforations were 5.3 ± 5.8 dB and 6.6 ± 5.7 dB, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative ABG between the two surgical procedures (p > 0.05). The total operation time for TST tympanoplasty was significantly shorter than that for PU tympanoplasty (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: TST tympanoplasty is considered a novel, simple technique to replace traditional tympanoplasty techniques involving raising eardrums, even for large-sized perforations.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myringoplasty; Soft tissue graft; Transtympanic approach; Tympanoplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 35590078     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07427-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  18 in total

1.  Comparison between transtympanic and elevation of tympanomeatal flap approaches in tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Firas Q Alzoubi; Amjed A Tarifi; Yousef Khader; John de Carpentier
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 2.  Fascia compared to one-piece composite cartilage-perichondrium grafting for tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Sarah A Lyons; Tanly Su; Linda E T Vissers; Jeroen P M Peters; Adriana L Smit; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Can myringoplasty close the air-bone gap?

Authors:  Alain Pfammatter; Eva Novoa; Thomas Linder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty.

Authors:  K Onal; M Z Uguz; K C Kazikdas; S T Gursoy; H Gokce
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Three autologous substitutes for myringoplasty: a comparative study.

Authors:  Zhi Gang Zhang; Qiu Hong Huang; Yi Qing Zheng; Wei Sun; Yu Bin Chen; Yu Si
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Cartilage graft in type I tympanoplasty: audiological and otological outcome.

Authors:  O Ben Gamra; C Mbarek; K Khammassi; N Methlouthi; H Ouni; I Hariga; S Zribi; J Koubâa; A El Khedim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Ten-year results of cartilage palisades versus fascia in eardrum reconstruction after surgery for sinus or tensa retraction cholesteatoma in children.

Authors:  Per Cayé-Thomasen; Janne Andersen; Cem Uzun; Søren Hansen; Mirko Tos
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1,000-patient series.

Authors:  John Dornhoffer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Acoustic properties of different cartilage reconstruction techniques of the tympanic membrane.

Authors:  Dirk Mürbe; Thomas Zahnert; Matthias Bornitz; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Success is a matter of experience: type 1 tympanoplasty : influencing factors on type 1 tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Hatice Emir; Kursat Ceylan; Zeynep Kizilkaya; Hakan Gocmen; Hakki Uzunkulaoglu; Erdal Samim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.