Literature DB >> 18351372

Cartilage graft in type I tympanoplasty: audiological and otological outcome.

O Ben Gamra1, C Mbarek, K Khammassi, N Methlouthi, H Ouni, I Hariga, S Zribi, J Koubâa, A El Khedim.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate anatomical and audiological results of cartilage tympanoplasty compared to fascia tympanoplasty in the reconstruction of tympanic membrane perforations. We carry a retrospective study about 380 patients operated in our department between 1998 and 2005. Patients were classified into two groups: 90 (23.6%) undergo cartilage tympanoplasty and 290 (76.4%) fascia tympanoplasty. In each group, we calculated the average of pre and postoperative air bone gap (ABG) and the average air conduction gain (ACG) at 250-4,000 Hz. The surgical technique is explained in detail. We detail and analyze the audiological and anatomical results in each group. Successful closure of the tympanic membrane perforation was achieved in 97% of the cartilage group as compared to 94% of the fascia group. The average ACG was 21 +/- 11 dB in cartilage group and 20 +/- 22 dB in fascia group. With an average follow-up of 2 years, residual perforation was observed in 2.2% in cartilage group. Reperforation of fascia graft and retraction were noted in 2.1 and 1%, respectively. The authors show the great reliability of cartilage tympanoplasty to close tympanic membrane perforations. We recommend using cartilage as a first choice, especially in stable or evolutive chronic otitis media, and in recurrent perforation of the tympanic membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18351372     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0645-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  22 in total

1.  Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty.

Authors:  M J Gerber; J C Mason; P R Lambert
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  [Reinforcing tympanoplasty with cartilage mosaic (differences from the palisade technique)].

Authors:  H Abou Mayaleh; R Heshiki; D Portmann; M Négrevergne
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  2005

3.  Experimental investigations of the use of cartilage in tympanic membrane reconstruction.

Authors:  T Zahnert; K B Hüttenbrink; D Mürbe; M Bornitz
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-05

4.  Inlay tympanoplasty: cartilage butterfly technique.

Authors:  R D Eavey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Cartilage-perichondrial composite graft tympanoplasty in the treatment of posterior marginal and attic retraction pockets.

Authors:  R M Levinson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty.

Authors:  R G Amedee; W J Mann; H Riechelmann
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1989-11

7.  Evaluation of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  M Mauri; J F Lubianca Neto; S C Fuchs
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  The total reconstruction of the tympanic membrane by the "crowncork" technique.

Authors:  J Hartwein; R M Leuwer; W Kehrl
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Auricular cartilage palisade tympano-, epitympano-, antrum- and mastoid-plasties.

Authors:  J Heermann
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1978-11

10.  Fascia and perichondrium atrophy in tympanoplasty and recurrent middle ear atelectasis.

Authors:  R A Buckingham
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  8 in total

1.  Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia.

Authors:  Arman Tek; Murat Karaman; Celil Uslu; Tülay Habeşoğlu; Yasin Kılıçarslan; Ruhi Durmuş; Senem Esen; Erol Egeli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Cartilage-perichondrium: an ideal graft material?

Authors:  Sunita Chhapola; Inita Matta
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-09-04

3.  Transtympanic soft tissue tympanoplasty can replace conventional techniques elevating tympanic membranes.

Authors:  Jungho Ha; Hantai Kim; Jeong Hun Jang; Hun Yi Park; Yun-Hoon Choung
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Is cartilage better than temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty? Implications for current surgical practice.

Authors:  Emily Iacovou; Petros V Vlastarakos; George Papacharalampous; Efthymios Kyrodimos; Thomas P Nikolopoulos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  New Cartilage Slicer for Slicing Techniques in Tympanoplasty: Design and Applications.

Authors:  Sapna Ramkrishna Parab; Mubarak M Khan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-07-31

6.  Comparison of Grafting Success Rate and Hearing Outcomes between Primary and Revision Tympanoplasties.

Authors:  Mohammad Faramarzi; Mahmood Shishegar; Saeed Reza Tofighi; Hadi Sharouny; Raman Rajagopalan
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-01

7.  Long-term results of type I tympanoplasty with perichondrium reinforced cartilage palisade vs temporalis fascia for large perforations: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Dipesh Shakya; Ajit Nepal
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2020-07-29

8.  Preparation and placement of cartilage island graft in tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Veysel Yurttas; Fatih Yakut; Ahmet Kutluhan; Kazım Bozdemir
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.