Literature DB >> 12368613

Acoustic properties of different cartilage reconstruction techniques of the tympanic membrane.

Dirk Mürbe1, Thomas Zahnert, Matthias Bornitz, Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The use of cartilage in reconstruction of the tympanic membrane has been established especially in cases such as tubal dysfunction and adhesive processes. Cartilage offers the advantage of higher mechanical stability compared with membranous transplants but may alter the acoustic transfer characteristics of the graft. Apart from material properties, it can be assumed that, also, the microsurgical reconstruction technique might influence the sound transmission properties of the reconstructed tympanic membrane. The purpose of the study was to investigate the acoustic transfer characteristics of different cartilage transplants being typically used in different reconstruction techniques of the tympanic membrane.
METHODS: Cartilage plates of different thicknesses (1.0, 0.7, 0.5, and 0.3 mm), cartilage palisades, and cartilage island transplants of varying size were investigated by means of an ear canal-tympanic membrane model. In contrast to former single-point measurements, sound-induced vibrational amplitudes of the entire transplant were measured by scanning laser Doppler vibrometry (measuring points, n = 133) (PSV-200, Polytec, Waldbronn, Germany). Frequency response functions (displacement vs. sound pressure) of all measured points were determined in the frequency range of 200 Hz to 4 kHz for the different transplants.
RESULTS: Cutting thick cartilage transplants into thin plates or palisades decreased the first resonance frequency and increased its amplitude, reflecting improved sound transmission properties of the transplant. From an acoustical point of view, the 0.5-mm cartilage plate seems preferable compared with the palisade technique. Cartilage island techniques showed vibration characteristics superior to plate or palisade techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: Apart from material characteristics, the sound transmission properties of the reconstructed tympanic membrane are strongly influenced by the reconstruction technique. The choice of the surgical technique should consider requirements based on mechanical stability and acoustic transfer characteristics of the transplant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12368613     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200210000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  25 in total

1.  Reconstructive methods in hearing disorders - surgical methods.

Authors:  Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28

2.  Hearing outcome after sequential cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Susen Lailach; Thomas Zahnert; Nikoloz Lasurashvili; Max Kemper; Thomas Beleites; Marcus Neudert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  [Pitfalls in ossicular chain reconstruction].

Authors:  T Zahnert; K-B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Comparisons of the mechanics of partial and total ossicular replacement prostheses with cartilage in a cadaveric temporal bone preparation.

Authors:  Cagatay Han Ulku; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Jeremie Guignard; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  To Evaluate and Compare the Result of Ossiculoplasty Using Different Types of Graft Materials and Prosthesis in Cases of Ossicular Discontinuity in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media Cases.

Authors:  Suresh Kumar; Kanak Yadav; Tarun Ojha; Abhishek Sharma; Amit Singhal; Saurabh Gakhar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-09-07

6.  Middle ear mechanics of cartilage tympanoplasty evaluated by laser holography and vibrometry.

Authors:  Antti A Aarnisalo; Jeffrey T Cheng; Michael E Ravicz; Nesim Hulli; Ellery J Harrington; Maria S Hernandez-Montes; Cosme Furlong; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Motion of the tympanic membrane after cartilage tympanoplasty determined by stroboscopic holography.

Authors:  Antti A Aarnisalo; Jeffrey T Cheng; Michael E Ravicz; Cosme Furlong; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Comparison of Partial Thickness and Full Thickness Tragal Cartilage Graft During Modified Cartilage Shield Tympanoplasty for Type I Procedures.

Authors:  Sohil Vadiya; Sushen Bhatt
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-01-28

9.  Cartilage support for fascia graft in type I tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Shreeya Kulkarni; Vinay Kulkarni; Kiran Burse; Vandana Sancheti; Gaurav Roy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-02-01

10.  Cartilage palisades in type 3 tympanoplasty: functional and hearing results.

Authors:  Ashish Vashishth; Neeraj Narayan Mathur; Deepak Verma
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.