Literature DB >> 21921853

Three autologous substitutes for myringoplasty: a comparative study.

Zhi Gang Zhang1, Qiu Hong Huang, Yi Qing Zheng, Wei Sun, Yu Bin Chen, Yu Si.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of 3 different kinds of autologous substitutes for simple myringoplasty. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of myringoplasty cases. PATIENTS: A total of 117 patients (52 women with 52 ears and 65 men with 65 ears) with an average age of 25.6 years (range, 12-51 yr) were examined. Forty-two cases exhibited large perforations, and 75 exhibited small perforations. INTERVENTION: Myringoplasty with temporal fascia, tragus perichondrium, or tragus cartilage-perichondrium composite grafts were randomly used in this comparative study. All the 117 operations were performed by a single surgeon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Otoscopic findings as assessed by a hearing examination using a quad-frequency pure-tone average air-bone gap.
RESULTS: Recurrent defects were not observed in the small perforation group repaired with autologous substitutes. The graft acceptance rate in this group was 100%. For the large perforation group, the graft acceptance rate was highest with the cartilage-perichondrium composite grafts group (p < 0.05) 1 year after the operation. Tympanic membranes repaired with temporalis fascia or perichondrium eventually perforated again or seemed invaginated and adherent. Early hearing improvements in the temporalis fascia and perichondrium groups were better than that of cartilage-perichondrium composite grafts, but there was no significant difference 1 year after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Temporal fascia, tragus perichondrium, and tragus cartilage-perichondrium composite grafts are all suitable for myringoplasty after a minor tympanic membrane perforation. However, cartilage-perichondrium composite graft material for myringoplasty has superior long-term benefits in regard to both hearing improvements and tympanic membrane morphology, which are especially evident in cases with large perforations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21921853     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822f0ba7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  6 in total

1.  Natural large-scale regeneration of rib cartilage in a mouse model.

Authors:  Marissa K Srour; Jennifer L Fogel; Kent T Yamaguchi; Aaron P Montgomery; Audrey K Izuhara; Aaron L Misakian; Stephanie Lam; Daniel L Lakeland; Mark M Urata; Janice S Lee; Francesca V Mariani
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Comparative Study of Hearing Improvement of Type 1 Tympanoplasty Using Temporalis Fascia and Conchal Cartilage as Graft Material.

Authors:  Bhanu Bhardwaj; Jaskaran Singh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-09

3.  Transtympanic soft tissue tympanoplasty can replace conventional techniques elevating tympanic membranes.

Authors:  Jungho Ha; Hantai Kim; Jeong Hun Jang; Hun Yi Park; Yun-Hoon Choung
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Comparitive Study on Impact of Dry (Rigid) Versus Wet (Soft) Graft on the Outcome of Type 1 Tympanoplasty.

Authors:  B H Shrikrishna; Meghana Poornima Ramesh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-01-02

5.  Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Surgical Outcome in Tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Masoud Naderpour; Yalda Jabbari Moghadam; Ensieh Ghanbarpour; Nikzad Shahidi
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03

6.  Outlook for Tissue Engineering of the Tympanic Membrane.

Authors:  Maria A Villar-Fernandez; Jose A Lopez-Escamez
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2015-01-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.