| Literature DB >> 35567236 |
Pol Fernández1, Oriane Hidalgo1,2, Ana Juan3, Ilia J Leitch2, Andrew R Leitch4, Luis Palazzesi5, Luca Pegoraro6, Juan Viruel2, Jaume Pellicer1,2.
Abstract
Polyploidy is a widespread phenomenon across angiosperms, and one of the main drivers of diversification. Whilst it frequently involves hybridisation, autopolyploidy is also an important feature of plant evolution. Minority cytotypes are frequently overlooked due to their lower frequency in populations, but the development of techniques such as flow cytometry, which enable the rapid screening of cytotype diversity across large numbers of individuals, is now providing a more comprehensive understanding of cytotype diversity within species. Senecio doronicum is a relatively common daisy found throughout European mountain grasslands from subalpine to almost nival elevations. We have carried out a population-level cytotype screening of 500 individuals from Tête Grosse (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France), confirming the coexistence of tetraploid (28.2%) and octoploid cytotypes (71.2%), but also uncovering a small number of hexaploid individuals (0.6%). The analysis of repetitive elements from short-read genome-skimming data combined with nuclear (ITS) and whole plastid DNA sequences support an autopolyploid origin of the polyploid S. doronicum individuals and provide molecular evidence regarding the sole contribution of tetraploids in the formation of hexaploid individuals. The evolutionary impact and resilience of the new cytotype have yet to be determined, although the coexistence of different cytotypes may indicate nascent speciation.Entities:
Keywords: Asteraceae; cytotype; genome size; polyploidy; repetitive DNA; transposable elements
Year: 2022 PMID: 35567236 PMCID: PMC9099586 DOI: 10.3390/plants11091235
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Habitat preferences and morphology of tetraploid (A–C) and octoploid (D–F) cytotypes observed in Senecio doronicum from the population of Tête Grosse (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France).
Figure 2(A) Geographical distribution of the population of Senecio doronicum from Tête Grosse (). Additional sites sampled in the Southwestern French Alps are also indicated in the map and the cytotypes recovered indicated (4x = , 8x = ). (B) Distribution of individuals in the population of Tête Grosse, colored according to their cytotype. (C) Boxplots depicting the DNA ploidy levels assigned on the basis of relative fluorescence ratios of nuclei. Data Maps from Google Earth: Google Landsat/Copernicus Data SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO. GeoBasis-DE/BKG (©2009) Inst. Geogr. Nacional.
Figure 3Genomic composition of Senecio doronicum representative of each cytotype (4x, 6x and 8x). Estimates of the genomic abundances (in Mb/1C) of different repeats are indicated and colored by repeat class [GP = Genome proportion (%), LTR = Long Terminal Repeat].
Repetitive DNA composition estimated in individuals TG422 (4x), TG507 (6x) and TG84 (8x) as illustrative of the overall dynamics reported across cytotypes.
| Genome Proportion (GP) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4x | 6x | 8x | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14.51 | 610.40 | 14.86 | 944.78 | 15.28 | 1237.56 | |
| SIRE | 13.08 | 550.07 | 13.34 | 848.01 | 13.60 | 1101.70 | |
| Angela | 0.97 | 40.96 | 1.11 | 70.64 | 0.95 | 76.83 | |
| TAR | 0.11 | 4.64 | 0.10 | 6.43 | 0.14 | 11.51 | |
| Bianca | 0.06 | 2.44 | 0.06 | 3.99 | 0.31 | 24.73 | |
| Ale | 0.03 | 1.24 | 0.01 | 0.82 | 0.03 | 2.81 | |
| Tork | 0.06 | 2.37 | 0.04 | 2.48 | 0.06 | 4.60 | |
| Ikeros | 0.21 | 8.68 | 0.20 | 12.42 | 0.19 | 15.39 | |
|
| 46.86 | 1970.85 | 44.02 | 2798.58 | 42.06 | 3406.09 | |
| Tekay | 43.85 | 1843.88 | 40.61 | 2581.82 | 39.08 | 3164.91 | |
| Athila | 1.67 | 70.09 | 1.60 | 101.55 | 1.56 | 126.28 | |
| CRM | 0.39 | 16.41 | 0.42 | 26.46 | 0.36 | 29.44 | |
| Retand | 0.96 | 40.47 | 1.40 | 88.76 | 1.06 | 85.47 | |
|
| 3.39 | 142.61 | 5.49 | 348.91 | 6.42 | 519.65 | |
|
| |||||||
| Pararetrovirus | 0.01 | 0.46 | 0.22 | 13.93 | 0.22 | 17.71 | |
|
| 0.61 | 25.54 | 0.71 | 44.93 | 0.56 | 45.12 | |
| TIR/Enspm-CACTA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| TIR/MuDR-Mutator | 0.40 | 16.71 | 0.49 | 31.33 | 0.34 | 27.15 | |
| TIR/haT | 0.18 | 7.59 | 0.16 | 10.00 | 0.17 | 13.62 | |
| TIR/PIF-Harbinger | 0.03 | 1.24 | 0.06 | 3.60 | 0.05 | 4.35 | |
|
| |||||||
| Ribosomal DNA | 0.28 | 11.76 | 0.40 | 25.35 | 0.25 | 19.97 | |
| Satellite | 0.37 | 15.64 | 0.62 | 39.16 | 0.45 | 36.71 | |
|
| 5.92 | 249.17 | 5.64 | 358.81 | 5.94 | 480.84 | |
|
| 13.49 | 567.21 | 13.95 | 886.71 | 14.10 | 1141.67 | |
|
| 85.45 | 3593.65 | 85.91 | 5461.17 | 85.27 | 6905.31 | |
|
| 14.55 | 611.75 | 14.09 | 895.83 | 14.73 | 1192.53 | |
Figure 4Pairwise scatterplot comparisons of the number of reads included in repeat clusters from each cytotype. The slope indicates the genome size ratio between each cytotype. (A) 4x vs. 6x. (B) 4x vs. 8x. (C) 8x vs. 6x.
Statistics for the linear regression analyses carried out between cytotype pairs based on an analysis of the number of reads of Ty1/Copia-like elements, Ty3/Gypsy-like elements, and all repetitive elements (All). (SE: Standard error, Sig.: *** p-value < 0.0001).
| 8x–6x | 6x–4x | 8x–4x | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slope | SE | R2 | Sig. | Slope | SE | R2 | Sig. | Slope | SE | R2 | Sig. | |
|
| 1.37 | 0.01 | 0.996 | *** | 1.5 | 0.01 | 0.999 | *** | 2.06 | 0.02 | 0.996 | *** |
|
| 1.3 | 0.01 | 0.999 | *** | 1.5 | 0 | 0.999 | *** | 1.95 | 0.01 | 0.998 | *** |
|
| 1.31 | 0 | 0.997 | *** | 1.5 | 0 | 0.999 | *** | 1.97 | 0.01 | 0.997 | *** |
Figure 5Neighbour joining tree (A) and Neighbour net analysis (B) based on ITS sequences of European clade of Senecio sect. Crociseris from Calvo et al. [34], and including 4x, 6x and 8x individuals of Senecio doronicum from the present study. (C) Neighbour net analysis of whole plastid sequences among those same individuals sequenced in our study. Dashed line separates individuals of Tête Grosse from other populations in the area. Capital letters indicate genetic clusters.