BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Large-scale ploidy surveys using flow cytometry have become an essential tool to study plant genome dynamics and to gain insight into the mechanisms and genetic barriers framing ploidy diversity. As an ideal complement to traditional techniques such as chromosome counting, the analysis of cytotype diversity in plant systems such as Sorbus provides primary investigation into the potential patterns and evolutionary implications of hybrid speciation. METHODS: Ploidy was assessed by means of relative nuclear DNA content using propidium iodide flow cytometry in 474 Sorbus samples collected from 65 populations in southern Wales and South-West England. Statistical tests were applied to evaluate the utility of this technique to confidently discriminate ploidy in the genus. KEY RESULTS: Flow cytometric profiles revealed the presence of four cytotypes (2x, 3x, 4x and 5x), confirming in many cases chromosome counts previously reported and demonstrating cytotype heterogeneity within specific Sorbus aggregates. Diploid cytotypes were restricted to the potential parental species and homoploid hybrids. Most of the samples processed were polyploid. The occurrence of the pentaploid cytotype had previously only been reported from a single specimen; it is now confirmed for two taxa occurring at different sites. CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometry results obtained have proved useful in shedding light on the taxonomy of several controversial taxa and in confirming the presence of cytoypes which occur at very low frequencies. Notably, the coexistence of several cytotypes in Sorbus populations has probably been facilitated by the overlapping distribution of many of the species studied, which might also explain the high incidence of potential hybrid apomictic polyploids. These results will provide a solid baseline for molecular research aiming to better understand the genetic pathways controlling the formation and establishment of polyploid Sorbus.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Large-scale ploidy surveys using flow cytometry have become an essential tool to study plant genome dynamics and to gain insight into the mechanisms and genetic barriers framing ploidy diversity. As an ideal complement to traditional techniques such as chromosome counting, the analysis of cytotype diversity in plant systems such as Sorbus provides primary investigation into the potential patterns and evolutionary implications of hybrid speciation. METHODS: Ploidy was assessed by means of relative nuclear DNA content using propidium iodide flow cytometry in 474 Sorbus samples collected from 65 populations in southern Wales and South-West England. Statistical tests were applied to evaluate the utility of this technique to confidently discriminate ploidy in the genus. KEY RESULTS: Flow cytometric profiles revealed the presence of four cytotypes (2x, 3x, 4x and 5x), confirming in many cases chromosome counts previously reported and demonstrating cytotype heterogeneity within specific Sorbus aggregates. Diploid cytotypes were restricted to the potential parental species and homoploid hybrids. Most of the samples processed were polyploid. The occurrence of the pentaploid cytotype had previously only been reported from a single specimen; it is now confirmed for two taxa occurring at different sites. CONCLUSIONS: Flow cytometry results obtained have proved useful in shedding light on the taxonomy of several controversial taxa and in confirming the presence of cytoypes which occur at very low frequencies. Notably, the coexistence of several cytotypes in Sorbus populations has probably been facilitated by the overlapping distribution of many of the species studied, which might also explain the high incidence of potential hybrid apomictic polyploids. These results will provide a solid baseline for molecular research aiming to better understand the genetic pathways controlling the formation and establishment of polyploid Sorbus.
Authors: Ashley Robertson; Timothy C G Rich; Alexandra M Allen; Libby Houston; Cat Roberts; Jon R Bridle; Stephen A Harris; Simon J Hiscock Journal: Mol Ecol Date: 2010-03-12 Impact factor: 6.185
Authors: Pavel Trávnícek; Barbora Kubátová; Vladislav Curn; Jana Rauchová; Eva Krajníková; Jana Jersáková; Jan Suda Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2010-11-07 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Douglas E Soltis; Victor A Albert; Jim Leebens-Mack; Charles D Bell; Andrew H Paterson; Chunfang Zheng; David Sankoff; Claude W Depamphilis; P Kerr Wall; Pamela S Soltis Journal: Am J Bot Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.844
Authors: Francisco Balao; Ramón Casimiro-Soriguer; María Talavera; Javier Herrera; Salvador Talavera Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2009-07-25 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Veronika Uhrinová; Judita Zozomová-Lihová; Dana Bernátová; Juraj Paule; Ladislav Paule; Dušan Gömöry Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Shanna Ludwig; Ashley Robertson; Timothy C G Rich; Milena Djordjevic; Radosav Cerovic; Libby Houston; Stephen A Harris; Simon J Hiscock Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Luwei Wang; Junyi Ding; James S Borrell; Martin Cheek; Hugh A McAllister; Feifei Wang; Lu Liu; Huayu Zhang; Qiufeng Zhang; Yiming Wang; Nian Wang Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Maarten J M Christenhusz; Mark W Chase; Michael F Fay; Oriane Hidalgo; Ilia J Leitch; Jaume Pellicer; Juan Viruel Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2021-04-17 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Ana Paula Moraes; André Olmos Simões; Dario Isidro Ojeda Alayon; Fábio de Barros; Eliana Regina Forni-Martins Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 3.240