| Literature DB >> 35565764 |
Marlene Fabiola Escobedo-Monge1, Enrique Barrado2, Joaquín Parodi-Román3, María Antonieta Escobedo-Monge4, Marianela Marcos-Temprano5, José Manuel Marugán-Miguelsanz1,6.
Abstract
Magnesium (Mg) is an essential micronutrient that participates in various enzymatic reactions that regulate vital biological functions. The main aim was to assess the Mg status and its association with nutritional indicators in seventeen cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. The serum Mg and calcium (Ca) levels were determined using standardized methods and the dietary Mg intake by prospective 72 h dietary surveys. The mean serum Ca (2.45 mmol/L) and Mg (0.82 mmol/L) had normal levels, and the mean dietary intake of the Ca (127% DRI: Dietary Reference Intake) and Mg (125% DRI) were high. No patients had an abnormal serum Ca. A total of 47% of the subjects had hypomagnesemia and 12% insufficient Mg consumption. One patient had a serum Mg deficiency and inadequate Mg intake. A total of 47 and 82% of our series had a high serum Ca/Mg ratio of >4.70 (mean 4.89) and a low Ca/Mg intake ratio of <1.70 (mean 1.10), respectively. The likelihood of a high Ca/Mg ratio was 49 times higher in patients with a serum Mg deficiency than in normal serum Mg patients. Both Ca/Mg ratios were associated with the risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), metabolic syndrome (MetS), and even several cancers. Therefore, 53% of the CF patients were at high risk of a Mg deficiency and developing other chronic diseases.Entities:
Keywords: hypermagnesemia; hypomagnesemia; subclinical Mg deficiency
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35565764 PMCID: PMC9104329 DOI: 10.3390/nu14091793
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Flow diagram assignment of patients with cystic fibrosis (n = 17).
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of participants (n = 17 *) [27,28].
| Characteristics | Mean ± SD | Median | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 14.8 ± 8 | 15 | 2–31 |
| Body mass index Z-score | −0.95 ± 1.1 | −0.6 | −3.8–0.6 |
| Basal energy expenditure | 1078 ± 303 | 1149 | 440–1490 |
| Theoretical basal energy expenditure | 2193 ± 576 | 2200 | 1066–3251 |
| WHO basal energy expenditure | 1185 ± 233 | 1230 | 598–1559 |
| Serum magnesium (mg/dL) | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 2.0 | 1.5–2.3 |
| Serum calcium (mg/dL) | 9.8 ± 0.5 | 9.8 | 8.6–10.6 |
| Serum calcium/magnesium ratio | 4.89 ± 0.54 | 4.69 | 4.26–6.20 |
| Energy (calories) | 2595 ± 464 | 2672 | 1846–3410 |
| Magnesium intake (%DRI) | 125 ± 37 | 125 | 53–180 |
| Calcium intake (%DRI) | 127 ± 44 | 112 | 85–267 |
| Calcium/magnesium intake ratio | 1.09 ± 0.49 | 0.9 | 0.63–2.37 |
* Seventeen cystic fibrosis patients were screened, included, and analyzed.
Serum levels, dietary intake, and proportions of calcium and magnesium in patients with cystic fibrosis according to nutritional status (n = 17 *).
| Gender by | Age | Serum (mg/dL) | Dietary Intake (%DRI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca a | Mg b | Ca/Mg | Ca | Mg | Ca/Mg | ||
| Eutrophic | |||||||
| Male | 2 | 10.0 | 1.9 †† | 5.26 ‡ | 147 ** | 106 | 1.39 # |
| Male | 4 | 9.8 | 2.3 | 4.30 | 110 | 173 * | 0.63 # |
| Female | 6 | 9.8 | 2.0 †† | 4.95 ‡ | 122 ** | 99 | 1.24 # |
| Male | 8 | 9.9 | 2.0 †† | 4.51 ‡ | 267 ** | 179 ** | 1.49 # |
| Male | 8 | 9.6 | 2.2 | 4.36 | 154 ** | 180 ** | 0.85 # |
| Female | 9 | 10.4 | 2.1 | 4.95 ‡ | 138 ** | 92 | 1.49 # |
| Female | 9 | 10.1 | 2.2 | 4.59 | 84 | 118 | 0.72 # |
| Male | 13 | 9.7 | 2.1 | 4.62 | 109 | 134 ** | 0.82 # |
| Female | 20 | 10 | 2.2 | 4.50 | 120 | 115 | 1.04 # |
| Male | 23 | 9.5 | 2.0 †† | 4.75 ‡ | 97 | 53 * | 1.81 |
| Female | 23 | 9.3 | 1.5 † | 6.27 ‡ | 114 | 116 | 0.98 # |
| Female | 25 | 9.3 | 2.1 | 4.48 | 147 ** | 151 ** | 0.97 # |
| Undernutrition | |||||||
| Male | 15 | 9.9 | 2.2 | 4.50 | 155 ** | 65 * | 2.37 |
| Female | 15 | 10.6 | 1.9 †† | 5.58 ‡ | 103 | 152 ** | 0.68 # |
| Female | 16 | 10.2 | 2.2 | 4.64 | 87 | 111 | 0.79 # |
| Female | 18 | 8.6 | 1.9 †† | 4.68 | 95 | 132 ** | 0.72 # |
| Female | 31 | 9.7 | 1.7 † | 5.71 ‡ | 96 | 141 ** | 0.68 # |
Legend: BMI: body mass index. a Serum calcium (Ca) normal levels in children (8.8–10.8 mg/dL) and adults (9–10.5 mg/dL) [36]. b Serum magnesium (Mg): symptomatic hypomagnesemia (<1.22 mg/dL), asymptomatic hypomagnesemia (1.22–1.82 mg/dL), chronic latent magnesium deficiency (CLMD, 1.82–2.07 mg/dL), health (2.07–2.32 mg/dL), asymptomatic hypermagnesemia (2.32–4.86 mg/dL), symptomatic hypermagnesemia (>4.86 mg/dL) [37]. † CLMD, †† asymptomatic hypomagnesemia. Serum Ca/Mg ratio (3.91–4.70) [26]. Ca/Mg intake ratio 1.70–2.60 [39]. ‡ High serum Ca/Mg ratio. Normal dietary Ca and Mg intake ranges from 80–120% Dietary Reference Intake (%DRI). * Low intake. ** High intake. # Low Ca/Mg intake ratio.
Significant differences between cystic fibrosis patients (n = 17 *).
|
|
|
| |
| Magnesium intake (%DRI) | 107 ± 35 | 155 ± 18 | 0.009 * |
| Calcium/magnesium intake ratio | 1.31 ± 0.52 | 0.75 ± 0.13 | 0.008 * |
|
|
|
| |
| Iron intake (%DRI) | 132 ± 20 | 252 ± 118 | 0.045 * |
|
|
|
| |
| Nitrogen balance | 2.7 ± 4.3 | 13.9 | 0.034 * |
|
|
|
| |
| Nitrogen intake | 15.1 ± 2.7 | 20.6 ± 2.0 | 0.000 * |
| Nitrogen balance | 0.7 ± 4.3 | 6.3 ± 4.9 | 0.034 * |
|
|
|
| |
| Nitrogen balance | 8.9 ± 6.4 | 2.3 ± 4.3 | 0.048 * |
Legend: %DRI: Percentage of Dietary Reference Intake. * p < 0.05.
Regression analysis between serum level and dietary intake of magnesium (Mg) and calcium (Ca), serum and dietary Ca/Mg ratios, and nutritional parameters.
| Serum | Serum | Serum | Magnesium | Calcium | Ca/Mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear | regression | analyses | |||
| Multilinear | regression | analyses | |||
Legend: BIA: bioelectrical impedance analysis; IGFBP3: insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3; MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin; Ig: immunoglobulin; MCV: mean corpuscular volume.
Figure 2Regression serum magnesium (mg/dL) by age (years).
Figure 3Regression height-for-age Z-score by magnesium intake (%Dietary Reference Intake).
Figure 4Regression serum phosphorus (mg/dL) by serum magnesium (mg/dL).
Figure 5Regression serum total proteins (g/dL) by serum calcium (mg/dL).
Figure 6Regression serum zinc (µg/dL) by calcium intake (%Dietary Reference Intake).
Figure 7Regression zinc/copper ratio by calcium/magnesium intake ratio.
Figure 8Regression HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) by calcium/magnesium intake ratio.
Figure 9Regression IgM (mg/dL) by serum calcium/magnesium ratio.