| Literature DB >> 35565730 |
Ziyue Cheng1, Xueyan Gao1, Chengyang Yang1, Anna Brytek-Matera2, Jinbo He1.
Abstract
Body dissatisfaction and eating disorders have become major global concerns, including in Asian populations. Few studies have examined intervention effects on body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in China, especially for interventions with positive psychological perspectives (e.g., intuitive eating). In this pilot study, 66 women participated in an eight-module intuitive eating intervention delivered online (n = 42; mean age, 30.74 years) and face-to-face (n = 24; mean age, 19.46 years) for 8 weeks. Measures of body image and eating behaviors were used to assess the intervention's feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the data. The intervention had significant effects on both groups, promoting positive body image and intuitive eating and reducing negative body image and disordered eating behaviors. The effects of the online and face-to-face interventions did not differ significantly. Thus, whether delivered online or face-to-face, an intuitive eating intervention may effectively improve Chinese women's body image and eating behaviors. However, the efficacy of the intuitive intervention in the Chinese context should be confirmed in future studies with designs in randomized control trials.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese women; body image; disordered; feasibility study; intervention; intuitive eating
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35565730 PMCID: PMC9100518 DOI: 10.3390/nu14091761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Intuitive eating intervention modules and overview of their content.
| Session | Module | Content |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meet intuitive eating | Basic introduction to the concept of intuitive eating, meeting course participants |
| 2 | Reject dieting | Principle 1: reject the diet mentality. Introduction to dieting’s harm and costs, explanation of the dieting mental cycle |
| 3 | Accept your hunger | Principle 2: honor your hunger. Instruction about hunger and internal body sign awareness |
| 4 | Let’s make peace with food | Principle 3: make peace with food. Overview of how to make peace with food |
| 5 | Deal with the food police | Principle 4: challenge the food police. Explanation of the food police concept and instruction about how to deal with it |
| 6 | Learn to feel fullness and satisfaction | Principles 5 and 6: feel your fullness and discover the satisfaction factor. Instruction about the internal and external appearance of fullness, exploration of self-satisfaction factors |
| 7 | Learn to respect your body with the help of making peace with food | Principles 7 and 8: cope with your feelings without using food and respect your body. Exploration of the harm of emotional eating behaviors, self-care, trust, and respect for your body |
| 8 | Practice and application | Principles 9 and 10: Exercise: feel the difference and honor your health; gentle nutrition. Exploration of pleasurable exercise activities and the advantages and disadvantages of exercise. Instruction on nutrition for food selection. Future plan development |
Figure 1Flow of Study Participation.
Sample characteristics.
| Characteristics | Face-to-Face Group | Online Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (SD) | N (%) | M (SD) | N (%) | |
| Age(years) | 19.46(1.29) | 30.74(8.25) | ||
| Origin Area | ||||
| Urban | 23 (95.8%) | 39(92.9%) | ||
| Rural | 1(4.2%) | 3(7.1%) | ||
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Main | 22(91.7%) | 39(92.9%) | ||
| Minority | 2(8.3%) | 3(7.1%) | ||
| Baseline BMI | 23.05(4.66) | 23.44(3.72) | ||
| Post-test BMI | 23.03(4.63) | 23.04(3.75) | ||
Note. M, mean; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2).
Intervention effects.
| Outcomes | Face-to-Face Group | Online Group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Cohen’s | Before | After | Cohen’s | |||
| Eating disorder symptoms | 12.79(8.59) | 8.46(8.40) | 1.09 | 12.78(5.78) | 8.48(6.73) | 1.42 | ||
| Intuitive eating | 72.71(13.30) | 87.46(16.40) | 2.28 | 74.29(10.53) | 84.93(9.94) | 1.69 | ||
| Body image inflexibility | 3.38(1.66) | 3.08(1.85) | 0.52 | 4.04(1.25) | 3.36(1.33) | 1.03 | ||
| Eating inflexibility | 3.08(0.81) | 2.29(0.96) | 1.98 | 3.18(0.70) | 2.70(0.68) | 1.32 | ||
| Functionality appreciation | 4.39(0.62) | 4.64(0.53) | 0.78 | 4.21(0.64) | 4.49(0.47) | 0.94 | ||
| Clinical impairment | 13.88(12.87) | 9.96(12.23) | 0.98 | 13.69(9.87) | 8.48(8.99) | F(1, 41.57) = 12.88 *** | 1.11 | |
| Body dissatisfaction | 38.17(10.96) | 30.83(13.34) | 1.73 | 41.78(8.98) | 35.90(11.14) | 1.70 | ||
| Body appreciation | 3.23(1.04) | 3.97(0.92) | 1.83 | 3.10(0.82) | 3.60(0.85) | 1.85 | ||
Note. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. M, mean; SD, standard deviation.
Interaction between intervention effects and type (online vs. face-to-face).
| Variables | Cohen’s | |
|---|---|---|
| Eating disorder symptoms | 0.02 | |
| Intuitive eating | 0.35 | |
| Body image inflexibility | 0.28 | |
| Eating inflexibility | 0.42 | |
| Functionality appreciation | 0.04 | |
| Clinical impairment | 0.11 | |
| Body dissatisfaction | 0.24 | |
| Body appreciation | 0.40 |