| Literature DB >> 35563994 |
Sílvia Castro Coelho1, Berta Nogueiro Estevinho1, Fernando Rocha1.
Abstract
Water-soluble vitamins are essential micronutrients in diets and crucial to biochemical functions in human body physiology. These vitamins are essential for healthy diets and have a preventive role against diseases. However, their limitations associated with high sensitivity against external conditions (temperature, light, pH, moisture, oxygen) can lead to degradation during processing and storage. In this context, microencapsulation may overcome these conditions, protecting a biomolecule's bioavailability, stability, and effectiveness of delivery. This technique has been used to produce delivery systems based on polymeric agents that surround the active compounds. The present review focuses on the most relevant topics of water-soluble vitamin encapsulation using promising methods to produce delivery vehicles-electrohydrodynamic (electrospinning and electrospraying) and spray-drying techniques. An overview of the suitable structures produced by these processes is provided. The review introduces the general principles of the methods, advantages, disadvantages, and involved parameters. A brief list of the used physicochemical techniques for the systems' characterization is discussed in this review. Electrospinning and spray-drying techniques are the focus of this investigation in order to guarantee vitamins' bioaccessibility and bioavailability. Recent studies and the main encapsulating agents used for these micronutrients in both processes applied to functional food and nutraceutical areas are highlighted in this review.Entities:
Keywords: electrospinning; electrospraying; microencapsulation; spray drying; water-soluble vitamins
Year: 2022 PMID: 35563994 PMCID: PMC9100492 DOI: 10.3390/foods11091271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Morphology of microstructures.
Microencapsulation techniques [9,10,11].
| Chemical Processes | Physical Processes |
|---|---|
| Coacervation | Spray drying |
| Interfacial polymerization | Spray chilling |
| Co-crystallization | Melt extrusion |
Advantages and disadvantages of most common techniques used in food applications.
| Encapsulation Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Complex coacervation | Encapsulation of thermo-sensitive compounds | Use of toxic chemical solvents |
| Electrohydrodynamic techniques | Simple and versatile techniques | Difficult to scale up |
| Fluidized bed coating [ | Low cost-in-use | Slow process |
| Freeze-drying [ | Long-term storage | Complex process |
| Ionic gelation | Mild conditions during the process | Low hydrophilic compounds encapsulation efficiency |
| Liposomes | Encapsulation of aqueous/lipid soluble compounds | Laboratory scale |
| Melt extrusion | Solvent free | Not recommended for thermolabile compounds |
| Solvent evaporation | Simple procedure | Low encapsulation efficiency |
| Spray chilling | Low temperature in the process | Changes in compounds activity due to fast cooling rates |
| Spray drying | Simple procedure | High energy consumption |
Figure 2Examples of biopolymers used for microencapsulation processes.
Figure 3Schematic illustration of spray-drying setup.
Examples of the application of the spray-drying technique for water-soluble vitamins for food and nutraceutical applications.
| Vitamin | Encapsulation | Processing | Structures Average | Product Yield | Encapsulation Efficiency (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin B1 | Gum arabic | 4 mL/min | 0.11–1.32 | 17–52 | 66–100 | [ |
| Chitosan and ferulic acid | 10 mL/min | 4.5–4.8 | 63.58–65.12 | 91 ± 2.31 | [ | |
| Vitamin B6 | Chitosan and ferulic acid | 10 mL/min | 4.5–4.8 | 63.58–65.12 | 83 ± 3.17 | [ |
| Folic acid | Gum arabic | 4 mL/min, | 0.1–3.0 | 13.1–49.8 | 100% (except for modified starch) | [ |
| Cape gooseberry and maltodextrin | 1.5 L/h | - | - | 90.9 ± 1.8 | [ | |
| Starch | ~140 L/h | 28.26–227.34 | 50.29 | 57.29 | [ | |
| Whey protein concentrate | 140 L/h | 0.2–4.5 | - | 83.9 ± 7.8 | [ | |
| Vitamin B12 | Gum acacia | Tinlet = 140 °C | 0.279–1.277 | - | 57.64–72.03 | [ |
| Cyanobacterial extracellular polysaccharide, gum arabic | 4 ml/min, | 6–9 | 18.8 | - | [ | |
| Sodium alginate | 4 ml/min | 0.93–2.74 | 27–50 | - | [ | |
| Zein | 4 mL/min; Tin = 90 °C; Tout = 50 °C | 2.23 | 83.1 | 82.3 | [ | |
| Modified chitosan | 4 ml/min | 3–8 | 56.0–58.0 | - | [ | |
| Vitamin B12 | Chitosan, modified chitosan | 4 L/h | 3 | 41.8–55.6 | - | [ |
| Vitamin C | Casein gel | 0.54 L/h | 5.8 ± 3.1 | - | 44.5 ± 1.2 | [ |
| Sodium alginate | 2–7 mL/min | 9.1 | 74 | 90 | [ | |
| Cape gooseberry and maltodextrin | 1.5 L/h | - | - | 69.7 ± 0.7 | [ | |
| Sodium alginate | Tinlet = 110 °C | 30 | 93.48 | [ | ||
| TPP-chitosan | 3 L/h | 8.0–9.0 | 61.1–62.8 | 45.05–58.30 | [ |
-: Data not available.
Figure 4Advantages of electrospun/electrospray structures for food applications.
Figure 5Schematic illustration of the basic setup for (A) electrospinning and (B) electrospraying.
Water-soluble vitamin encapsulation by electrospinning/electrospraying techniques for food and nutraceutical applications.
| Vitamin | Encapsulation Agent | Processing Parameters | Encapsulation | Structures Average Size (µm) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Folic acid | Zein | 1 mL/h, 16 cm,16 kV 0.6mL/h, 10 cm, 16 kV | 92.9 | 0.70 (fibres) | [ |
| Starch | 0.6 mL/h, 20 cm, 25 kV | 73–95 | [ | ||
| Whey protein concentrate | 0.15 mL/h, 9–11 cm, 10 kV | 80.8 ± 12.9 | 0.2–4.5 | [ | |
| Amaranth:pullulan | 0.4 mL/h, 10 cm, 22 kV | 95.6 ± 0.2 | 0.31–0.59 | [ | |
| Vitamin B12 | Zein | 0.2 mL/h, 7 cm, 20 kV | 100 | 0.31–0.5 (fibres) | [ |