| Literature DB >> 30246007 |
Bei-Xing Li1,2, Xiao-Xu Li1, Yang Liu1, Da-Xia Zhang1,2, Jin Lin2, Wei Mu2, Feng Liu1,2.
Abstract
A model solvent, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, was encapsulated using coordination assembly between metal ions and tannic acid to reveal the deposition of coordination complexes on the liquid-liquid interface. The deposition was confirmed by zeta potential, energy dispersive spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy were integrated to characterize the microcapsules (MCs). According to atomic force microscopy height analysis, membrane thickness of the MCs increased linearly with sequential deposition. For MCs prepared using the Fe3+-TA system, the average membrane thicknesses of MCs prepared with 2, 4, 6, and 8 deposition cycles were determined as 31.3 ± 4.6, 92.4 ± 15.0, 175.4 ± 22.1, and 254.8 ± 24.0 nm, respectively. Dissolution test showed that the release profiles of all the four tested MCs followed Higuchi kinetics. Membrane thicknesses of MCs prepared using the Ca2+-TA system were much smaller. We can easily tune the membrane thickness of the MCs by adjusting metal ions or deposition cycles according to the application requirements. The convenient tunability of the membrane thickness can enable an extensive use of this coordination assembly strategy in a broad range of applications.Entities:
Keywords: coordination assembly; deposition; membrane thickness; metal ion; microcapsule; polyphenol
Year: 2018 PMID: 30246007 PMCID: PMC6137620 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Advantages and disadvantages of various encapsulation methods.
| Inexpensive wall materials and simple manufacturing equipment (Sukhorukov et al., | Highly complex procedure (Fan and Zhou, | |
| Interfacial polymerization | Simple process and lower emphasis on monomer purity (Wagh et al., | Time-consuming; high cost of polymer monomer (Li et al., |
| Spray drying | Simple procedure (Wang et al., | High energy consumption (Aghbashlo et al., |
| Solvent e vaporation | Simple procedure (Fan et al., | Low drug-loading efficiency (Lee et al., |
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopy images of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs prepared with different numbers of deposition cycles. Scale bars represent 2 μm.
Figure 2Typical transmission electron microscopy images of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs prepared with 4 and 8 deposition cycles. Scale bars represent 200 nm.
Figure 3Morphology and membrane thickness of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs prepared with sequential deposition cycles by using Fe3+-TA system. (a–d) Typical AFM images of MCs deposited for 2, 4, 6, and 8 cycles. (e–h) Corresponding amplitude error images and (i–l) height analysis profiles of MCs prepared with different deposition cycles. Scale bars represent 2 μm.
Figure 4(A) Membrane thicknesses of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs (prepared with Fe3+-TA) by measuring 20 MCs via AFM height analysis. Data are represented as the mean ± SD. (B) Release profiles of the MCs in artificial release medium.
Figure 5Morphology and membrane thickness of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene-loaded MCs prepared with sequential deposition cycles by using Ca2+-TA system. (a–e) Typical AFM images of MCs deposited for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 cycles. (f–j) Corresponding amplitude error images, and (k–o) height analysis profiles of MCs prepared with different deposition cycles. Scale bars represent 2 μm.