| Literature DB >> 35563983 |
Dandan Liu1, Kang Wang1, Xiaoran Xue1, Qiang Wen2, Shiwen Qin1, Yukai Suo2, Mingzhi Liang3.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of processing methods on the content of biogenic amines in Zijuan tea by using derivatization and hot trichloroacetic acid extraction with HPLC-UV. The results showed that the most abundant biogenic amine in the original leaves was butylamine, followed by ethylamine, methylamine, 1,7-diaminoheptane, histamine, tyramine, and 2-phenethylamine. However, during the process of producing green tea, white tea, and black tea, the content of ethylamine increased sharply, which directly led to their total contents of biogenic amines increasing by 184.4%, 169.3%, and 178.7% compared with that of the original leaves, respectively. Unexpectedly, the contents of methylamine, ethylamine, butylamine, and tyramine in dark tea were significantly reduced compared with those of the original leaves. Accordingly, the total content of biogenic amines in dark tea was only 161.19 μg/g, a reduction of 47.2% compared with that of the original leaves, indicating that the pile-fermentation process could significantly degrade the biogenic amines present in dark tea.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC; Zijuan tea; biogenic amine; food quality; processing method
Year: 2022 PMID: 35563983 PMCID: PMC9103763 DOI: 10.3390/foods11091260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1HPLC chromatogram map of the mixed biogenic amine standard (50 μg/mL each). Peak assignment: 1, MTM; 2, ETM; 3, PYN; 4, BTM; 5, PEM; 6, PTN; 7, DIM; 8, HIM; and 9, TYM.
The performances of LC-UV method.
| BAs | Calibration Curve Equation | R2 | LOD (μg/mL) | LOQ (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methylamine | y = 228.7x + 82.568 | 0.9995 | 0.15 | 0.50 |
| Ethylamine | y = 113.73x + 115.19 | 0.9999 | 0.31 | 1.04 |
| Pyrrolidine | y = 142.42x − 18.254 | 0.9999 | 0.29 | 0.96 |
| Butylamine | y = 71.14x + 148.51 | 0.9951 | 0.42 | 1.40 |
| 2-Phenethylamine | y = 64.163x + 5.8879 | 0.9998 | 0.44 | 1.51 |
| Putrescine | y = 53.625x + 91.609 | 0.9996 | 0.33 | 0.98 |
| 1,7-Diaminoheptane | y = 35.049x − 18.118 | 0.9983 | 0.96 | 3.22 |
| Histamine | y = 73.276x + 7.4512 | 0.9999 | 0.43 | 1.46 |
| Tyramine | y = 64.951x + 47.487 | 0.9995 | 0.36 | 1.20 |
Recovery rate and relative standard deviation (RSD) of the nine BAs.
| BAs | Recovery Rate (%) | RSD (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 μg/g | 150 μg/g | 300 μg/g | 30 μg/g | 150 μg/g | 300 μg/g | |
| Methylamine | 98.2 | 96.5 | 100.2 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Ethylamine | 97.5 | 105.1 | 95.7 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 1.3 |
| Pyrrolidine | 96.8 | 92.2 | 103.4 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 2.4 |
| Butylamine | 99.2 | 94.5 | 95.7 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 4.7 |
| 2-Phenethylamine | 97.1 | 99.7 | 95.9 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 2.8 |
| Putrescine | 93.8 | 96.9 | 98.4 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 4.1 |
| 1,7-Diaminoheptane | 99.2 | 95.8 | 97.5 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 3.8 |
| Histamine | 95.9 | 97.4 | 94.6 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 1.7 |
| Tyramine | 99.1 | 104.4 | 98.7 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 2.7 |
Figure 2Changes in the contents of biogenic amines in the original leaves and green tea. Each column indicates the mean ± SD of the content of a biogenic amine. The significant differences in the contents of biogenic amines between the original leaves and green tea were analyzed using Student’s t-test for independent samples. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, ns no significance.
Figure 3Changes in the contents of biogenic amines in the original leaves and fermented teas. Each column indicates the mean ± SD of the content of a biogenic amine. The significant differences in the contents of biogenic amines among the original leaves, white tea, black tea, and dark tea were analysed using the Duncan multiple mean comparison test. Columns labelled with the same letter had no significant difference among the four samples, p > 0.05.