| Literature DB >> 34063215 |
Netnapa Makhamrueang1, Sasithorn Sirilun2, Jakkapan Sirithunyalug2, Wantida Chaiyana1, Wiwat Wangcharoen3, Sartjin Peerajan4, Chaiyavat Chaiyasut1.
Abstract
Hericium erinaceus is reported as a source of several nutritional contents and bioactive compounds, especially β-glucan. However, various uncontrolled processes lead to the formation of byproducts that can affect human health, including biogenic amines. These amines are concerning, because their presence is an important indicator of the process of hygiene and food spoilage or quality. A better understanding of various pretreatment processes can control the content of biogenic amines. In this work, we studied the effect of pretreatment processes, i.e., sample size (whole, ripping, and chopping); heating process (non-heating, blanching, and boiling); and drying method (nondrying, hot air drying, and freeze-drying) on biogenic amine contents in H. erinaceus extract. A method of the post-column high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique was used for the analysis of putrescine (PUT) and spermidine (SPD) in H. erinaceus extract following the acceptable guidelines. In this study, treatment 20 (chopping/non-heating/hot air drying) was suggested as a good choice for the pretreatment process, because low levels of PUT and SPD were shown in the extract while high levels of the bioactive compounds β-glucan and antioxidant activity were presented. This treatment process can be applied to the industry because of its easy operation and cost-saving.Entities:
Keywords: Hericium erinaceus; antioxidant activity; biogenic amine; pretreatment; β-glucan
Year: 2021 PMID: 34063215 PMCID: PMC8147423 DOI: 10.3390/foods10050996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
The codes of an independent variable on the factorial experimentations for the biogenic amine contents.
| Independent Variables | Code Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Sample size (X1) | whole | ripping | chopping |
| Heating process (X2) | non-heating | blanching | boiling |
| Drying method (X3) | nondrying | hot air drying | freeze drying |
The gradient program of mobile phase A and mobile phase B for the separation of biogenic amines in the extract from H. erinaceus.
| Operation | Time (Min) | Mobile Phase (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | ||
| elution | 0 | 70 | 30 |
| 10 | 70 | 30 | |
| 25 | 0 | 100 | |
| return | 28 | 70 | 30 |
| equilibration | 35 | 70 | 30 |
Summary results related to the post-column derivatization HPLC method validation of the biogenic amines in the H. erinaceus extract.
| Validation Parameters | PUT | SPD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linearity | R2 | 0.9995 | 0.9981 | ||
| Accuracy | Recovery (%) | 80% | 105.94 | 101.62 | |
| 100% | 106.77 | 100.47 | |||
| 120% | 107.76 | 101.75 | |||
| Precision | RSD (%) | Intraday | 80% | 5.86 | 5.36 |
| 100% | 5.26 | 4.66 | |||
| 120% | 4.27 | 4.32 | |||
| Inter-day | 80% | 4.55 | 4.2 | ||
| 100% | 5.72 | 4 | |||
| 120% | 4.47 | 4.22 | |||
| LOD (mg/mL) | 0.01 | 0.55 | |||
| LOQ (mg/mL) | 0.04 | 1.67 | |||
The factorial experimentations of the three factors for the contents of the biogenic amines (µg/g dry weight) in the H. erinaceus extract.
| Treatment | Independent Variables | Biogenic Amines Content 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (µg/g Dry Weight) | |||||
| Sample Size | Heat Process | Drying Method | PUT | SPD | |
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 10.32 ± 0.56 | 102.52 ± 5.20 |
| 2 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 21.95 ± 1.69 | 31.10 ± 3.08 |
| 3 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 4.60 ± 0.18 * | 8.95 ± 0.71 * |
| 4 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 83.16 ± 7.82 | 137.97 ± 4.93 |
| 5 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 14.13 ± 1.22 | 6.73 ± 0.62 * |
| 6 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 2.84 ± 0.49 * | 13.23 ± 1.00 * |
| 7 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 70.43 ± 5.86 | 148.74 ± 5.06 |
| 8 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 7.96 ± 0.66 * | 9.37 ± 1.47 * |
| 9 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 2.52 ± 0.38 * | 10.87 ± 0.21 * |
| 10 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 11.24 ± 0.32 | 58.40 ± 5.20 |
| 11 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 9.00 ± 1.04 | 28.39 ± 2.14 |
| 12 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 3.44 ± 0.37 * | 5.29 ± 0.56 * |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 45.22 ± 2.49 | 108.43 ± 10.05 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.36 ± 0.16 * | 15.48 ± 0.87 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.93 ± 0.28 * | 3.53 ± 0.35 * |
| 16 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 59.90 ± 5.19 | 91.90 ± 7.02 |
| 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14.98 ± 2.00 | 4.90 ± 0.15 * |
| 18 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5.12 ± 0.62 * | 8.92 ± 0.75 * |
| 19 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 7.27 ± 0.08 * | 39.89 ± 2.78 |
| 20 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 7.69 ± 0.44 * | 6.49 ± 0.18 * |
| 21 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 9.73 ± 0.23 | 8.56 ± 0.31 * |
| 22 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 11.02 ± 0.44 | 46.14 ± 4.63 |
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.81 ± 0.11 * | 12.95 ± 0.44 * |
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.04 ± 0.12 * | 9.45 ± 0.58 * |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 28.45 ± 1.13 | 69.80 ± 1.30 |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.92 ± 0.56 * | 5.34 ± 0.44 * |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.41 ± 0.24 * | 7.14 ± 0.38 * |
1 The values were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation in triplicate. * Represent the same group with a low content according to Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05) among the same column.
Figure 1The contents of β-glucan in the H. erinaceus extracts from different pretreatment processes (Error bars represent a standard deviation of three replicates).
Figure 2The Trolox equivalent in the H. erinaceus extracts from different pretreatment processes (Error bars represent a standard deviation of three replicates).
Figure 3The changes of the PUT content (µg/g of dry weight) in the H. erinaceus extracts from different pretreatment processes: (a1) whole, (a2) ripping, and (a3) chopping and the changes of the SPD content (µg/g of dry weight) in the H. erinaceus extracts from different pretreatment processes: (b1) whole, (b2) ripping, and (b3) chopping.