Literature DB >> 35560150

Tocilizumab for giant cell arteritis.

Aileen A Antonio1, Ronel N Santos1, Samuel A Abariga2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of systemic vasculitis in people older than 50 years of age. It causes granulomatous inflammation of medium- to large-sized vessels. Tocilizumab is a recombinant monoclonal antibody directed against interleukin-6 receptors (IL-6R).
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab, given alone or with corticosteroids, compared with therapy without tocilizumab for treatment of GCA. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2020, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 3 January 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared tocilizumab of any dosage regimen (alone or with corticosteroids) with therapy without tocilizumab that had a minimum follow-up of six months. Participants were at least 50 years of age, with biopsy-proven GCA or by large-vessel vasculitis by angiography, and met the American College of Rheumatology 1990 guidelines for GCA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN
RESULTS: Main results We included two RCTs in the review. The studies were conducted in the USA, Canada, and Europe and enrolled a total of 281 participants with GCA, of whom 74% were women. The mean age of participants was 70 years, with new-onset or relapsing GCA, and fulfilled the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria with no uncontrolled comorbidities. Both studies were funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, the manufacturer of tocilizumab. Findings One RCT (30 participants) compared tocilizumab administered every four weeks versus placebo. Point estimates at 12 months and beyond favored tocilizumab over placebo in terms of sustained remission (risk ratio (RR) 4.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 14.88; moderate-certainty evidence). Point estimates suggest no evidence of a difference for all-cause mortality at 12 months or more (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.94; moderate-certainty evidence). At 12 months, mean time to first relapse after induction of remission was 25 weeks in favor of participants receiving tocilizumab compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) 25, 95% CI 11.4 to 38.6; moderate-certainty evidence). The second RCT (250 participants) randomized participants into two intervention and two comparator groups to receive tocilizumab weekly (100 participants), bi-weekly (49 participants), weekly placebo + 26-week taper (50 participants), or weekly placebo + 52-week taper (51 participants). At 12 months, point estimates from this study on proportion of participants with sustained remission favored participants who received tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 3.17, 95% CI 1.71 to 5.89; 151 participants); tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.97 to 8.12; 150 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.75; 100 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 3.79, 95% CI 1.82 to 7.91; 99 participants) (moderate-certainty evidence). Point estimates on proportion of participants who did not need escape therapy (defined by the study as the inability to keep to the protocol-defined prednisone taper) favored participants who received tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.35; 151 participants); tocilizumab weekly versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 2.96, 95% CI 1.83 to 4.78; 150 participants); tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 52-week taper (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.14; 100 participants) but not tocilizumab every other week versus placebo + 26-week taper (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.54; 99 participants) (moderate-certainty evidence). This study did not report mean time to first relapse after induction of remission or all-cause mortality.  Across comparison groups, the same study found no evidence of a difference  in vision changes and inconsistent evidence with regard to quality of life. Evidence on quality of life as assessed by the physical (MD 8.17, 95% CI 4.44 to 11.90) and mental (MD 5.61, 95% CI 0.06 to 11.16) component score of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) favored weekly tocilizumab versus placebo + 52-week taper but not bi-weekly tocillizumab versus placebo + 26-week taper (moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events One RCT reported a lower percentage of participants who experienced serious adverse events when receiving tocilizumab every four weeks versus placebo. The second RCT reported no evidence of a difference among groups with regard to adverse events; however, fewer participants reported serious adverse events in the tocilizumab weekly and tocilizumab biweekly interventions compared with the placebo + 26-week taper and placebo + 52-week taper comparators. Investigators in both studies reported that infection was the most frequently reported adverse event. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: This review indicates that tocilizumab therapy may be beneficial in terms of proportion of participants with sustained remission, relapse-free survival, and the need for escape therapy. While the evidence was of moderate certainty, only two studies were included in the review, suggesting that further research is required to corroborate these findings. Future trials should address issues related to the required duration of therapy, patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and economic outcomes, as well as the clinical outcomes evaluated in this review.
Copyright © 2022 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35560150      PMCID: PMC9105486          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013484.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  36 in total

Review 1.  Large-vessel involvement in giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Tim Bongartz; Eric L Matteson
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: role of cytokines in the pathogenesis and implications for treatment.

Authors:  Victor Manuel Martinez-Taboada; Lorena Alvarez; Maria RuizSoto; Maria Jose Marin-Vidalled; Marcos Lopez-Hoyos
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.861

3.  Risk of relapse after discontinuation of tocilizumab therapy in giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Sabine Adler; Stephan Reichenbach; Andrea Gloor; Daniel Yerly; Jennifer L Cullmann; Peter M Villiger
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Contemporary prevalence estimates for giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica, 2015.

Authors:  Cynthia S Crowson; Eric L Matteson
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Association between strong inflammatory response and low risk of developing visual loss and other cranial ischemic complications in giant cell (temporal) arteritis.

Authors:  M C Cid; C Font; J Oristrell; A de la Sierra; B Coll-Vinent; A López-Soto; J Vilaseca; A Urbano-Márquez; J M Grau
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-01

6.  Visual manifestations of giant cell arteritis. Trends and clinical spectrum in 161 patients.

Authors:  M A González-Gay; C García-Porrúa; J Llorca; A H Hajeer; F Brañas; A Dababneh; C González-Louzao; E Rodriguez-Gil; P Rodríguez-Ledo; W E Ollier
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Glucocorticoid therapy in giant cell arteritis: duration and adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Anne Proven; Sherine E Gabriel; Carlos Orces; W Michael O'Fallon; Gene G Hunder
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-10-15

8.  Swedish Society of Rheumatology 2018 guidelines for investigation, treatment, and follow-up of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  C Turesson; O Börjesson; K Larsson; A J Mohammad; A Knight
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Glucocorticoid Dosages and Acute-Phase Reactant Levels at Giant Cell Arteritis Flare in a Randomized Trial of Tocilizumab.

Authors:  John H Stone; Katie Tuckwell; Sophie Dimonaco; Micki Klearman; Martin Aringer; Daniel Blockmans; Elisabeth Brouwer; Maria C Cid; Bhaskar Dasgupta; Juergen Rech; Carlo Salvarani; Hendrik Schulze-Koops; Georg Schett; Robert Spiera; Sebastian H Unizony; Neil Collinson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 10.995

10.  Distinct vascular lesions in giant cell arteritis share identical T cell clonotypes.

Authors:  C M Weyand; J Schönberger; U Oppitz; N N Hunder; K C Hicok; J J Goronzy
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.