Literature DB >> 11039076

Visual manifestations of giant cell arteritis. Trends and clinical spectrum in 161 patients.

M A González-Gay1, C García-Porrúa, J Llorca, A H Hajeer, F Brañas, A Dababneh, C González-Louzao, E Rodriguez-Gil, P Rodríguez-Ledo, W E Ollier.   

Abstract

Giant cell (temporal) arteritis (GCA) is the most common systemic vasculitis in Western countries. It involves large and medium-sized vessels with predisposition to the cranial arteries in the elderly. Cranial ischemic complications, in particular permanent visual loss, constitute the most feared aspects of this vasculitis. Although the use of corticosteroids and a higher physician awareness may have contributed to a decrease in the frequency of severe ischemic complications, permanent visual loss is still present in 7%-14% of patients. To investigate further the incidence, trends, and clinical spectrum of visual manifestations in patients with GCA, we examined the features of patients with biopsy-proven GCA diagnosed at the single reference hospital for a defined population in northwestern Spain during an 18-year period. Predictive factors for the development of any visual manifestation, not only permanent visual loss, were also examined. Between 1981 and 1998, 161 patients were diagnosed with biopsy-proven GCA. Visual ischemic complications were observed in 42 (26.1%), and irreversible blindness, mainly due to anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and frequently preceded by amaurosis fugax, was found in 24 (14.9%). Despite a progressive increase in the number of new cases diagnosed, there was not a significant change in the proportion of patients with visual manifestations during the study period (p = 0.37). Patients with visual ischemic complications had lower clinical and laboratory biologic markers of inflammation. Indeed, during the last years of the study, anemia was associated with a very low risk of visual complications. Also, HLA-DRB1*04-positive patients had visual manifestations more commonly. Patients with other ischemic complications developed irreversible blindness more frequently. The best predictors of any visual complication were HLA-DRB1*04 phenotype (odds ratio [OR] 7.47) and the absence of anemia at the time of admission (OR for patients with anemia = 0.07). The best predictors of irreversible blindness (permanent visual loss) were amaurosis fugax (OR 12.63) and cerebrovascular accidents (OR 26.51). The present study supports the claim that ocular ischemic complications are still frequent in biopsy-proven GCA patients from southern Europe. The presence of other ischemic complications constitutes an alarm for the development of irreversible blindness. In contrast, a higher inflammatory response may be a protective factor against the development of cranial ischemic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11039076     DOI: 10.1097/00005792-200009000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


  66 in total

Review 1.  Giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  J M Calvo-Romero
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Recent advances in diagnostic strategies for giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Tanaz A Kermani; Kenneth J Warrington
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Delays in recognition and management of giant cell arteritis: results from a retrospective audit.

Authors:  Amara N Ezeonyeji; Frances A Borg; Bhaskar Dasgupta
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Miguel A Gonzalez-Gay; Carlos Garcia-Porrua; Jose A Miranda-Filloy; Javier Martin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Giant cell arteritis: diagnosis and therapeutic management.

Authors:  Miguel A Gonzalez-Gay; Carlos Garcia-Porrua; Jose A Miranda-Filloy
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 6.  CD24: from a Hematopoietic Differentiation Antigen to a Genetic Risk Factor for Multiple Autoimmune Diseases.

Authors:  Yixin Tan; Ming Zhao; Bo Xiang; Christopher Chang; Qianjin Lu
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 7.  Giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Zhi Ping Hu; Wei Lu; Xiang Q Tang; He P Yang; Liu W Zeng; Jie Zhang; Ting Li
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  [Giant cell arteritis: etiological knowledge and diagnostic challenge for pathologists].

Authors:  S C Schaefer; H A Lehr
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 9.  Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis in older patients: diagnosis and pharmacological management.

Authors:  Jean Schmidt; Kenneth J Warrington
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Fabrizio Cantini; Laura Niccoli; Carlotta Nannini; Michele Bertoni; Carlo Salvarani
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.