Literature DB >> 30915462

Risk of relapse after discontinuation of tocilizumab therapy in giant cell arteritis.

Sabine Adler1,2, Stephan Reichenbach2, Andrea Gloor2, Daniel Yerly3, Jennifer L Cullmann4, Peter M Villiger2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It is currently unknown how long GCA should be treated with tocilizumab. In the first randomized controlled trial, the biologic agent was stopped after 52 weeks. We therefore studied what proportion of patients relapsed, when relapses occurred and whether factors might predict relapse after tocilizumab treatment discontinuation.
METHODS: All patients in the tocilizumab arm who had received a 52-week treatment were evaluated. In case of lasting remission, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) was performed and sera were taken to search for biomarkers associated with subclinical disease activity.
RESULTS: Seventeen of 20 patients randomized to the tocilizumab treatment arm were in lasting remission without any co-medication at week 52. Mean follow-up after study end was 28.1 months (range 17-44). Eight patients relapsed after a mean of 6.3 months (range 2-14) (six within the first 5 months, two patients at months 13 and 14, respectively). Relapsing patients were younger and showed more signs of mural enhancement in MRA compared with non-relapsing patients. MRA documented low-intensity vessel wall signals in all subjects. No morphological changes such as formation of aneurysm of aorta occurred. Biomarkers in sera did not indicate subclinical disease activity: levels of IL-6, MMP-3, soluble TNF receptor 2, soluble CD163, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and Pentraxin-3 did not differ from matched healthy controls.
CONCLUSION: The data show that a 52-week treatment with tocilizumab induces a lasting remission that persists in half of the patients after treatment stop. None of the clinical, serological or MRA findings qualify to predict relapse. Remarkably, MRA revealed a persisting wall enhancement of the descending aorta.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; giant cell arteritis; imaging; relapse; tocilizumab

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30915462     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  11 in total

Review 1.  Giant cell arteritis successfully treated with subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy.

Authors:  Misako Higashida-Konishi; Mitsuhiro Akiyama; Tatsuya Shimada; Satoshi Hama; Tatsuhiro Oshige; Keisuke Izumi; Hisaji Oshima; Yutaka Okano
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.580

Review 2.  Tocilizumab for giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Aileen A Antonio; Ronel N Santos; Samuel A Abariga
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-13

3.  Intravenous tocilizumab for the treatment of giant cell arteritis: a phase Ib dose-ranging pharmacokinetic bridging study.

Authors:  Thomas Daikeler; Peter M Villiger; Christophe Schmitt; Laura Brockwell; Mylène Giraudon; Mauro Zucchetto; Lisa Christ; Bettina Bannert
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Monitoring and long-term management of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica.

Authors:  Dario Camellino; Eric L Matteson; Frank Buttgereit; Christian Dejaco
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 5.  Tocilizumab for giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Aileen A Antonio; Ronel N Santos; Samuel A Abariga
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-22

6.  Vision loss in patients with giant cell arteritis treated with tocilizumab.

Authors:  Jennifer Amsler; Iveta Kysela; Christoph Tappeiner; Luca Seitz; Lisa Christ; Godehard Scholz; Odile Stalder; Florian Kollert; Stephan Reichenbach; Peter M Villiger
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 7.  Need and value of targeted immunosuppressive therapy in giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Maria Sandovici; Niels van der Geest; Yannick van Sleen; Elisabeth Brouwer
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-02

Review 8.  [Update on treatments and innovations in systemic auto-immune diseases].

Authors:  L Guillevin
Journal:  Bull Acad Natl Med       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 0.144

Review 9.  Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis-Current and Future.

Authors:  B Hellmich; A F Águeda; S Monti; R Luqmani
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 10.  Advances in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis.

Authors:  Santos Castañeda; Diana Prieto-Peña; Esther F Vicente-Rabaneda; Ana Triguero-Martínez; Emilia Roy-Vallejo; Belén Atienza-Mateo; Ricardo Blanco; Miguel A González-Gay
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.