Literature DB >> 9433866

Association between strong inflammatory response and low risk of developing visual loss and other cranial ischemic complications in giant cell (temporal) arteritis.

M C Cid1, C Font, J Oristrell, A de la Sierra, B Coll-Vinent, A López-Soto, J Vilaseca, A Urbano-Márquez, J M Grau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical and biochemical parameters that have good predictive value for identifying giant cell (temporal) arteritis (GCA) patients who are at high or low risk of developing cranial ischemic events.
METHODS: In this multicenter study, records of patients at 3 university hospitals in Barcelona were reviewed retrospectively. Two hundred consecutive patients with biopsy-proven GCA were studied.
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients developed irreversible cranial ischemic complications. The duration of clinical symptoms before diagnosis was similar in patients with and those without ischemic events. Patients with ischemic complications less frequently had fever (18.8% versus 56.9%) and weight loss (21.9% versus 62%) and more frequently had amaurosis fugax (32.3% versus 6%) and transient diplopia (15.6% versus 3.6%). Patients with ischemic events had lower erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR) (82.7 mm/hour versus 104.4 mm/hour) and higher concentrations of hemoglobin (12.2 gm/dl versus 10.9 gm/dl) and albumin (37.4 gm/liter versus 32.7 gm/liter). Clinical inflammatory status and biologic inflammatory status were defined empirically (clinical: fever and weight loss; biologic: ESR > or =85 mm/hour and hemoglobin < 11.0 gm/dl). Patients not showing a clinical and biologic inflammatory response were at high risk of developing ischemic events (odds ratio [OR] 5, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.05-12.2). The risk was greatly reduced among patients with either a clinical (OR 0.177, 95% CI 0.052-0.605) or a biologic (OR 0.226, 95% CI 0.076-0.675) inflammatory reaction. No patient with both a clinical and a biologic response developed ischemic events.
CONCLUSION: The presence of a strong acute-phase response defines a subgroup of patients at very low risk of developing cranial ischemic complications. Our findings provide a rationale for testing less aggressive treatment schedules in these individuals. Conversely, a low inflammatory response and the presence of transient cranial ischemic events provide a high risk of developing irreversible ischemic complications and require a prompt therapeutic intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9433866     DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199801)41:1<26::AID-ART4>3.0.CO;2-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  42 in total

Review 1.  Giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  J M Calvo-Romero
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Delays in recognition and management of giant cell arteritis: results from a retrospective audit.

Authors:  Amara N Ezeonyeji; Frances A Borg; Bhaskar Dasgupta
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Miguel A Gonzalez-Gay; Carlos Garcia-Porrua; Jose A Miranda-Filloy; Javier Martin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 4.  Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis in older patients: diagnosis and pharmacological management.

Authors:  Jean Schmidt; Kenneth J Warrington
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  [Fever, redness, swelling, and pain in the submental region].

Authors:  U R Goessler; A Marx; K Hörmann; F Riedel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Clinical diagnosis and management of large vessel vasculitis: giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Soumya Chatterjee; Scott D Flamm; Carmela D Tan; E Rene Rodriguez
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Giant cell arteritis: ophthalmic manifestations of a systemic disease.

Authors:  Elisabeth De Smit; Eoin O'Sullivan; David A Mackey; Alex W Hewitt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Tanaz A Kermani; Jean Schmidt; Cynthia S Crowson; Steven R Ytterberg; Gene G Hunder; Eric L Matteson; Kenneth J Warrington
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 9.  Monitoring and long-term management of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica.

Authors:  Dario Camellino; Eric L Matteson; Frank Buttgereit; Christian Dejaco
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 20.543

10.  Characteristics of cerebrovascular accidents at time of diagnosis in a series of 98 patients with giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Thierry Zenone; Marie Puget
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.