Literature DB >> 3555969

A survey of the acoustic output of ultrasonic Doppler equipment.

F A Duck, H C Starritt, S P Anderson.   

Abstract

Measurements of the acoustic output generated by a variety of clinical ultrasonic Doppler instruments have been carried out. The instruments surveyed include continuous wave Doppler units for cardiovascular investigations, fetal monitors, stand-alone pulsed Doppler equipment and 'duplex' scanners working in Doppler mode. Acoustic measurements have been made using a calibrated PVDF membrane hydrophone, and a milliwatt radiation force balance. Almost all the pulsed Doppler and duplex systems investigated could generate spatial-peak, temporal-average intensities in water which exceeded 100 mW cm-2, with a maximum of 825 mW cm-2 measured. These intensities were also reached by some continuous-wave Doppler systems, particularly those incorporated into duplex scanning systems. Fetal monitoring equipment was found to operate typically at lower intensities. Doppler units have been found to show a very wide variation in pulse length, repetition frequency and spatial peak pressure, and a wider range of pulse average intensities than previously reported. Units were found to vary considerably in their control of total acoustic power whilst operating parameters such as gate width and range were altered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3555969     DOI: 10.1088/0143-0815/8/1/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0143-0815


  5 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Gauging the likelihood of stable cavitation from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.