Literature DB >> 3555060

Dual individualization of intravenous ciprofloxacin in patients with nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections.

D E Nix, M F Sands, C A Peloquin, A J Vari, T J Cumbo, J W Vance, J E Fracasso, J J Schentag.   

Abstract

Dual individualization is the integration of patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameters with the pharmacodynamics (concentration versus response) of the infecting pathogen. This technique allows description of the time of in vivo bacterial eradication, and allows estimation of optimal dosages using small numbers of seriously ill patients. In an ongoing study, 11 patients with nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections were given 200 mg of intravenous ciprofloxacin every 12 hours. Ten blood samples were taken after the first dose, with additional peaks and troughs measured on Day 4 and at the end of treatment. Bacterial isolates had minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) determined by standard microdilution techniques. In the 11 patients, there were 14 bacterial isolates, of which seven were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the remainder were other pathogens. Ciprofloxacin MICs ranged from 0.008 to 1.0 microgram/ml. The pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in these patients varied with renal function, and average peak serum concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 4.9 micrograms/ml. Eradication of bacteria from tracheal aspirates occurred between Days 1 and 7, except in four patients in whom the organism persisted. Correlations were observed between the day of eradication and the length of time ciprofloxacin concentrations remained above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). Essentially all bacteria with MICs of less than 0.25 were eradicated. Of the non-eradicated bacteria, most had either MICs of more than 0.25, or less than 100 percent time above the MIC. The clinical response was satisfactory. It is concluded that 200 mg of intravenous ciprofloxacin every 12 hours is highly effective for bacteria with MICs less than 0.25 microgram/ml, but higher dosages may be required to eradicate organisms with higher MICs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3555060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  9 in total

Review 1.  Achieving an optimal outcome in the treatment of infections. The role of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials.

Authors:  R C Li; M Zhu; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Antibiotic tissue penetration and its relevance: impact of tissue penetration on infection response.

Authors:  D E Nix; S D Goodwin; C A Peloquin; D L Rotella; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  The economic potential of dual individualisation methodologies.

Authors:  J A Paladino; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Basis of anti-infective therapy: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic criteria and methodology for dual dosage individualisation.

Authors:  A Sánchez-Navarro; M M Sánchez Recio
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics of quinolones: newer aspects.

Authors:  J S Wolfson; D C Hooper
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Ciprofloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  D M Campoli-Richards; J P Monk; A Price; P Benfield; P A Todd; A Ward
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  A Forrest; D E Nix; C H Ballow; T F Goss; M C Birmingham; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Clinical significance of antibiotic tissue penetration.

Authors:  J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Quinolone antibiotics.

Authors:  Thu D M Pham; Zyta M Ziora; Mark A T Blaskovich
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.597

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.