Literature DB >> 1864287

Pharmacokinetics of quinolones: newer aspects.

J S Wolfson1, D C Hooper.   

Abstract

Differences in pharmacokinetic properties are emerging as important determinants in distinguishing among clinical uses of individual new quinolone antimicrobial agents. Selected data on pharmacokinetics, new pharmacokinetic studies, and pharmacodynamics are reviewed, with reference to norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, enoxacin, fleroxacin, lomefloxacin, and other new quinolones. Considering pharmacokinetics, oral bioavailability is excellent (greater than 95%) for most quinolones. Differences in peak serum concentrations and beta-half-lives of elimination exist, however, and are reflected in up to ten-fold differences in values of the area under the curve of serum concentration versus time for administration of similar drug doses. As suggested by high apparent volumes of distribution and low binding to serum proteins, penetration into many body tissues and fluids is favorable. Considering new findings, orally administered ciprofloxacin has been found to be absorbed primarily in the duodenum and jejunum. Studies also suggest this drug to be cleared by transepithelial elimination into the bowel lumen as well as by the renal route. Oral bioavailability of quinolones has been demonstrated to be in general good in ill as well as healthy subjects but is reduced on co-administration with magnesium- and aluminum-containing acids, sucralfate (which contains aluminum), or ferrous sulfate. Pharmacodynamic parameters, such as the relationship of serum concentrations and drug potency in vitro to clinical response and suppression of bacterial resistance, have been little studied and merit further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1864287     DOI: 10.1007/bf01967000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  76 in total

1.  The effect of sucralfate pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  D E Nix; W A Watson; L Handy; R W Frost; D L Rescott; H R Goldstein
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.705

2.  Evaluation of in vitro antibacterial activity of enoxacin: comparison with other orally absorbed antimicrobial agents, proposed disk diffusion test interpretive criteria, and quality control limits.

Authors:  P C Fuchs; A L Barry; R N Jones; C Thornsberry
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Correlation of antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters with therapeutic efficacy in an animal model.

Authors:  B Vogelman; S Gudmundsson; J Leggett; J Turnidge; S Ebert; W A Craig
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  The pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of enoxacin and norfloxacin.

Authors:  R Wise; R Lockley; M Webberly; Z N Adhami
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Inhibition of theophylline clearance by coadministered ofloxacin without alteration of theophylline effects.

Authors:  S L Gregoire; T H Grasela; J P Freer; K J Tack; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In-vitro activity of enoxacin (CL-919), a new quinoline derivative, compared with that of other antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  R Wise; J M Andrews; G Danks
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Disk susceptibility of ofloxacin, a new carboxyquinolone.

Authors:  W Mandell; H C Neu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral enoxacin in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  T Chang; A Black; A Dunky; R Wolf; A Sedman; J Latts; P G Welling
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Ciprofloxacin disk susceptibility tests: interpretive zone size standards for 5-microgram disks.

Authors:  A L Barry; R J Fass; J P Anhalt; H C Neu; C Thornsberry; R C Tilton; B G Painter; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  J S Wolfson; D C Hooper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  18 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and PK-PD integration of danofloxacin in sheep biological fluids.

Authors:  F Shojaee Aliabadi; M F Landoni; P Lees
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Effect of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of grepafloxacin.

Authors:  C Efthymiopoulos; S L Bramer; A Maroli
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Fluoroquinolones: use of clinical data to aid formulary choice by the system of objective judgement analysis (SOJA) method.

Authors:  R Janknegt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Interaction study of lomefloxacin and ciprofloxacin with omeprazole and comparative pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  H Stuht; H Lode; P Koeppe; K L Rost; T Schaberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  The effect of staggered dosing of sucralfate on oral bioavailability of sparfloxacin.

Authors:  M Kamberi; H Nakashima; K Ogawa; N Oda; S Nakano
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Impact of the fluoroquinolones on gastrointestinal flora.

Authors:  V Korten; B E Murray
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Determination of pefloxacin concentration in mesenteric lymph nodes by high-performance chromatography.

Authors:  M I Munera; F Cuesta; A Abadia; J Vasquez; M Restrepo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Single-dose pharmacokinetics of oral fleroxacin in bacteremic patients.

Authors:  J Schrenzel; F Cerruti; M Herrmann; T Leemann; E Weidekamm; R Portmann; B Hirschel; D P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of rufloxacin in normal volunteers.

Authors:  J C Kisicki; R S Griess; C L Ott; G M Cohen; R J McCormack; W M Troetel; B P Imbimbo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Ciprofloxacin decreases survival in HT-29 cells via the induction of TGF-beta1 secretion and enhances the anti-proliferative effect of 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  Leonidas A Bourikas; George Kolios; Vassilis Valatas; George Notas; Ioannis Drygiannakis; Iordanis Pelagiadis; Pinelopi Manousou; Stefanos Klironomos; Ioannis A Mouzas; Elias Kouroumalis
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.