| Literature DB >> 35550457 |
Tianqi Wang1, Xiaoying Yan2, Qi Zhou2.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: A close relationship has recently been described between subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and gut microbiota disorders. Herein, we aim to investigate the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) on gut microbiota in participants with SCD.We conducted a study of 60 participants with SCD. Sixty participants were allocated to either EA group (n = 30) or sham acupuncture group (n = 30). Both groups received 24 sessions of real acupuncture treatment or identical treatment sessions using the placebo needle. Global cognitive change based on a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery was evaluated to detect the clinical efficacy of acupuncture treatment at the baseline and the end of treatment. Faecal microbial analyses were carried out after collecting stools at T0 and T12 weeks. Microbiomes were analyzed by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Correlation analyses were performed to investigate the relationships between the changes in gut microbiota and symptom improvement.Age is a particularly important factor leading to the severity of dementia. Compared with sham acupuncture group, the number of Escherichia-Shigella in EA group decreased after treatment. The number of Escherichia-Shigella in EA group decreased after treatment compared with EA group before treatment. Bifidobacterium is positively correlated with clinical efficacy Z-score and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (both P < .005).Acupuncture could improve global cognitive change among SCD participants by regulating the intestinal flora. Dysbiosis was found in the gut microbiome in SCD and partially relieved by acupuncture. Our study suggests that gut microbiota could be a potential therapeutic target and diagnostic biomarker for SCD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35550457 PMCID: PMC9276146 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Location of acupoints in electroacupuncture group.
Location of sham acupoints used in the sham acupuncture group.
| Sham Acupoint | Location |
| Sham acupoint 1 | Midpoint of Shuaigu (GB8) and Touwei (ST8) |
| Sham acupoint 2 | Midpoint of Touwei (ST8) and Yangbai (GB14) |
| Sham acupoint 3 | Midpoint between Tianyou (SJ16) and Tianrong (SI17) |
| Sham acupoint 4 | 4 cun above the umbilicus and 1 cun right of the umbilical midline |
| Sham acupoint 5 | 2 cun below the umbilicus and 1 cun right of the umbilical midline |
| Sham acupoint 6 | 1 cun outside the point 1/4 of the line between Shenmen (HT7) and Shaohai (HT3) |
| Sham acupoint 7 | 1 cun outside the midpoint of Shenmen (HT7) and Shaohai (HT3) |
| Sham acupoint 8 | 6 cun above mediosuperior border of the patella |
| Sham acupoint 9 | 3 cun below the Yanglingquan (GB34) and in the middle of the gallbladder and bladder channels |
| Sham acupoint 10 | Midpoint between Jiexi (ST 41) and Qiuxu (GB40) |
| Sham acupoint 11 | 2 cun from the lower border of the spinous process of the fifth thoracic vertebra |
| Sham acupoint 12 | 2 cun from the lower border of the spinous process of the sixth thoracic vertebra |
Comparison of baseline data between acupuncture treatment group and sham acupuncture control group.
| Category | Acupuncture treatment group (n = 30) | Sham acupuncture group (n = 30) | |
| Age (yr) | 64.90 ± 5.37 | 65.23 ± 5.33 | .810 |
| Sex, n, female | 26 (83.9%) | 25 (83.3%) | 1.000 |
| Years of education (yr) | 9.90 ± 2.70 | 10.05 ± 3.55 | .856 |
| SCDQ | 6.76 ± 1.25 | 6.90 ± 1.23 | .656 |
| MoCA | 21.29 ± 3.13 | 21.10 ± 3.06 | .811 |
| MMSE | 27.45 ± 1.89 | 27.63 ± 1.88 | .709 |
| AVLT-S | 5.68 ± 2.07 | 5.53 ± 2.46 | .808 |
| AVLT-L | 5.32 ± 1.89 | 4.87 ± 2.60 | .435 |
| AFT | 18.10 ± 3.82 | 17.67 ± 5.09 | .709 |
| BNT | 24.23 ± 2.64 | 24.23 ± 2.94 | .992 |
| TMT-A | 66.68 ± 17.18 | 68.37 ± 20.19 | .726 |
| TMT-B | 183.10 ± 62.12 | 190.57 ± 54.49 | .620 |
| SCWT-C | 79.81 ± 19.75 | 83.93 ± 23.93 | .465 |
| DSST | 30.19 ± 7.29 | 29.50 ± 7.90 | .723 |
| DST | 12.16 ± 2.05 | 11.83 ± 1.66 | .496 |
| CDT | 21.29 ± 6.59 | 23.02 ± 4.97 | .254 |
| GDS | 1.61 ± 1.12 | 1.70 ± 1.37 | .786 |
| PSQI | 5.81 ± 5.09 | 6.53 ± 4.59 | .561 |
AFT = animal fluency test, AVLT = auditory verbal learning test, DSST = digit symbol substitution test, GDS = Geriatric Depression Scale, PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, SBSDS = Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale, SCDQ = Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire, SCWT = Stroop color word test, TMT = trail making test.
Comparisons of acupuncture treatment group and sham acupuncture group.
| Variables | Acupuncture group [post–pre] (95% CI) | Sham acupuncture group [post–pre] (95% CI) | |
| Primary outcome | |||
| Composite Z score | 0.314 (0.195 to 0.433) | 0.135 (0.022 to 0.248) | .035 |
| Secondary outcomes | |||
| AVLT-S | 1.516 (0.847 to 2.185) | 0.500 (−0.336 to 1.336) | .045 |
| AVLT-L | 1.774 (1.036 to 2.512) | 1.233 (0.363 to 2.103) | .300 |
| AFT | −0.613 (−2.054 to 0.829) | 0.433 (−0.973 to 1.840) | .264 |
| BNT | 1.161 (0.498 to 1.825) | 0.333 (−0.619 to 1.286) | .169 |
| TMT-A | −3.893 (−11.034 to 3.357) | −3.467 (−11.529 to 4.586) | .946 |
| TMT-B | 0.097 (−16.040 to 16.233) | −1.667 (−20.905 to 17.571) | .893 |
| SCWT-C | −8.780 (−13.5581 to −3.839) | −4.067 (−9.483 to 1.350) | .178 |
| DSST | 1.323 (−0.568 to 3.213) | 1.733 (−1.078 to 4.545) | .524 |
| DST | 0.484 (−0.136 to 1.104) | 0.200 (−0.461 to 0.861) | .572 |
| CDT | 2.284 (0.068 to 4.900) | −0.233 (−1.108 to 0.215) | .068 |
| SCDQ | −1.677 (−2.345 to −1.010) | −0.983 (−1.729 to −0.237) | .135 |
| MoCA | 2.290 (1.406 to 3.175) | 0.000 (−1.286 to 1.286) | .002∗ |
| MMSE | 0.774 (0.134 to 1.415) | 0.533 (−0.205 to 1.272) | .536 |
| GDS | −0.129 (−0.783 to 0.525) | −0.433 (−1.081 to 0.215) | .520 |
| PSQI | −0.226 (−1.686 to 1.234) | −0.333 (−1.909 to 1.243) | .943 |
AFT = animal fluency test, AVLT = auditory verbal learning test, DSST = digit symbol substitution test, GDS = Geriatric Depression Scale, PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, SBSDS = Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale, SCDQ = Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire, SCWT = Stroop color word test, TMT = trail making test.
Figure 2Alpha-diversity and Beta-diversity in SCD patients. SCD = subjective cognitive decline.
Figure 3Correlation analysis of environmental factors of SCD. SCD = subjective cognitive decline.
Figure 4Electroacupuncture treatment partially ameliorates gut dysbiosis of SCD. SCD = subjective cognitive decline.
Figure 5Correlations between the gut microbe and SCD clinical indices. SCD = subjective cognitive decline.
Figure 6KEGG pathway analysis in SCD (Heatmap pathway in level 3). KEGG = Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, SCD = subjective cognitive decline.