| Literature DB >> 35549771 |
Jianwei Zhang1,2, Jan Dolfing3, Wenjing Liu1,2, Ruirui Chen1, Jiabao Zhang1, Xiangui Lin1, Youzhi Feng4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microorganisms are known to be important drivers of biogeochemical cycling in soil and hence could act as a proxy informing on soil conditions in ecosystems. Identifying microbiomes indicative for soil fertility and crop production is important for the development of the next generation of sustainable agriculture. Earlier researches based on one-time sampling have revealed various indicator microbiomes for distinct agroecosystems and agricultural practices as well as their importance in supporting sustainable productivity. However, these microbiomes were based on a mere snapshot of a dynamic microbial community which is subject to significant changes over time. Currently true indicator microbiomes based on long-term, multi-annual monitoring are not available.Entities:
Keywords: Archived soils; Fertilization; Soil fertility; Soil microorganisms; Sustainable agroecosystem
Year: 2022 PMID: 35549771 PMCID: PMC9101894 DOI: 10.1186/s40793-022-00420-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Microbiome ISSN: 2524-6372
Fig. 1Fertilization type and duration strongly structure the microbial community. Projection of the data in PCoA based on Bray Curtis distance. Symbols represent microbiomes and are colored by fertilization type (a by the specific fertilization type of origin) by duration (b sampling year, color gradient). The first three PCs are plotted with the percentage of variation explained by each PC
Fig. 2Identification of indicator microbiome in this temporal survey. The ratios of both abundance (%) and richness of the indicator microbiome phylotypes in the community are reported in the pie charts. The upset plot denotes the overlap of phylotypes between individual fertilizer-specific indicator microbiome. Phylogeny of indicator microbiome identified in this temporal survey (d). The tree shows the phylogenetic relationships of OTUs (n = 604) persistently present in individual fertilizer type. Ring “Phylum” indicates the most closely related bacterial type strain retrieved from GenBank, with sequence identity > 97% and 98.5% colored in black in adjacent ring “Identify”. Ring “Correlation” showed the spearman correlation coefficient between the proportion of individual phylotype and crop yield as well as multiple soil nutrient variables (TOC, TN, TP, TK). Ring “Abundance (%)” represent the proportion of individual phylotype in bacterial community. Blank cells in rings “Identity”, “Correlation” represent bacterial phylotypes that failed to match the threshold, i.e., sequence identity > 97% and 98.5% or statistical significance P < 0.05
Fig. 3Co-occurrence network of indicator microbiome. Network diagrams with nodes (n = 165) colored according to different ecological modules. Nodes indicate bacterial phylotypes (OTUs) and edges represent significant co-occurrence relationships (Spearman’s ρ > 0.6 and P < 0.05). Node’s size corresponds to their proportion in the community. Edges colored in red or blue denote significant positive or negative correlation, respectively, and edge widths correspond the correlation coefficient values (a). The Pearson correlation between module abundance and soil physicochemical properties and maize production. Blank cells denote the non-significant correlation at the threshold of P < 0.05 (b). The dynamic abundance of contrasting modules in divergent fertilization types across the sampling duration (c)
Fig. 4Multifunctionality of indicator microbiomes. We matched our bacterial phylotypes against the KEGG module table related to nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfate metabolism. NitrFix nitrogen fixation, Nitr nitrification, DNRA/ARNA dissimilatory/assimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium, ASR assimilatory sulfate reduction, PPM phosphonate and phosphinate metabolism, ALP alkaline phosphatase