Literature DB >> 35547178

Scanner-specific validation of a CT simulator using a COPD-emulated anthropomorphic phantom.

Sachin S Shankar1,2, Giavanna L Jadick1, Eric A Hoffman3,4, Jarron Atha3, Jessica C Sieren3,4, Ehsan Samei1,2, Ehsan Abadi1,2.   

Abstract

Traditional methods of quantitative analysis of CT images typically involve working with patient data, which is often expensive and limited in terms of ground truth. To counter these restrictions, quantitative assessments can instead be made through Virtual Imaging Trials (VITs) which simulate the CT imaging process. This study sought to validate DukeSim (a scanner-specific CT simulator) utilizing clinically relevant biomarkers for a customized anthropomorphic chest phantom. The physical phantom was imaged utilizing two commercial CT scanners (Siemens Somatom Force and Definition Flash) with varying imaging parameters. A computational version of the phantom was simulated utilizing DukeSim for each corresponding real acquisition. Biomarkers were computed and compared between the real and virtually acquired CT images to assess the validity of DukeSim. The simulated images closely matched the real images both qualitatively and quantitatively, with the average biomarker percent difference of 3.84% (range 0.19% to 18.27%). Results showed that DukeSim is reasonably well validated across various patient imaging conditions and scanners, which indicates the utility of DukeSim for further VIT studies where real patient data may not be feasible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropomorphic Phantom; CT; CT Quantification; DukeSim; Image Quality Validation; Kyoto-Kagaku; Virtual Imaging Trial

Year:  2022        PMID: 35547178      PMCID: PMC9087304          DOI: 10.1117/12.2613212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  11 in total

1.  Drawbacks and limitations of computed tomography: views from a medical educator.

Authors:  Herbert L Fred
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2004

2.  A low-cost density reference phantom for computed tomography.

Authors:  Zachary H Levine; Mingdong Li; Anthony P Reeves; David F Yankelevitz; Joseph J Chen; Eliot L Siegel; Adele Peskin; Diana N Zeiger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  DukeSim: A Realistic, Rapid, and Scanner-Specific Simulation Framework in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; Brian Harrawood; Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; William P Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis imaging and dual-energy subtraction radiography to detect simulated pulmonary nodules with and without calcifications a phantom study.

Authors:  Tsutomu Gomi; Masahiro Nakajima; Hiroki Fujiwara; Tokuo Umeda
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Development of a scanner-specific simulation framework for photon-counting computed tomography.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; Brian Harrawood; Jayasai R Rajagopal; Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; William Paul Segars; Karl Stierstorfer; Martin Sedlmair; Elizabeth Jones; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-08-09

6.  A scanner-specific framework for simulating CT images with tube current modulation.

Authors:  Giavanna Jadick; Ehsan Abadi; Brian Harrawood; Shobhit Sharma; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Imaging Advances in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Insights from the Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPDGene) Study.

Authors:  Surya P Bhatt; George R Washko; Eric A Hoffman; John D Newell; Sandeep Bodduluri; Alejandro A Diaz; Craig J Galban; Edwin K Silverman; Raúl San José Estépar; David A Lynch
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Trends and patterns in the use of computed tomography in children and young adults in Catalonia - results from the EPI-CT study.

Authors:  Magda Bosch de Basea; Jane A Salotti; Mark S Pearce; Jordi Muchart; Luis Riera; Ignasi Barber; Salvador Pedraza; Marina Pardina; Antoni Capdevila; Ana Espinosa; Elisabeth Cardis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-08-15

Review 9.  Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; William P Segars; Benjamin M W Tsui; Paul E Kinahan; Nick Bottenus; Alejandro F Frangi; Andrew Maidment; Joseph Lo; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-11

10.  Sensitivity and accuracy of volumetry of pulmonary nodules on low-dose 16- and 64-row multi-detector CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.

Authors:  Xueqian Xie; Yingru Zhao; Roland A Snijder; Peter M A van Ooijen; Pim A de Jong; Matthijs Oudkerk; Geertruida H de Bock; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Marcel J W Greuter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.