| Literature DB >> 35546810 |
Hui Sun1, Hong-Lian Zhang1, Ai-Hua Zhang1, Xiao-Hang Zhou1, Xiang-Qian Wang1, Ying Han1, Guang-Li Yan1, Liang Liu2, Xi-Jun Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
In this study, a combination of network pharmacology and metabolomics was used to explore the mechanism by which mirabilite regulates bile acid metabolism in the treatment of colorectal cancer. The PharmMapper web server was applied to make preliminary predictions for the treatment targets of mirabilite and to predict the interaction between mirabilite and disease targets using Discovery Studio 2.5. Furthermore, the urine metabolic profile was analyzed by the UPLC-Q-TOF-MS technology. The original data were processed by Progenesis QI software and analyzed by multivariate pattern recognition, which allowed us to reveal the metabolic disturbance in colorectal cancer and explain the therapeutic effect of mirabilite. The network pharmacology results showed that mirabilite can act on the disease targets, and the sites of action include amino acid residues Arg-364 and Asp-533, as well as nucleotides TPC-11, DG-112 and DA-113. Based on metabolomics, potential biomarkers were found to lie in the relevant pathways of bile acid metabolism, such as taurine, chenodeoxycholic acid, cholic acid, and deoxycholic acid. The results showed that mirabilite could regulate the distribution of overall metabolic disturbance, and bile acid metabolism was the main targeted pathway. Additionally, we predicted the upstream targets by ingenuity pathway analysis and found that mirabilite played a significant role in regulating the bile acid-related biomarkers, which allowed comprehensive analysis of the effect of mirabilite on colorectal cancer. This study fully explained the role of mirabilite in inhibiting colorectal cancer, which mainly occurs through bile acid metabolism, via the approach of network pharmacology combined with functional metabolomics. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35546810 PMCID: PMC9085400 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra04886j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1The network pharmacology analysis of DNA topoisomerase I and mirabilite. (A) The structure of DNA topoisomerase I. The green region represents the strongest site of action. (B) Docking of sulphate radicals in the active pocket of topoisomerase I.
Fig. 2The multivariate statistical analysis for urine samples of the control group and the model group on the 70th day. (A) The score plot of PCA between the control group and the model group in the positive mode; (B) the score plot of PCA between the control group and the model group in the negative mode; red squares represent model group and black squares represent control group. (C) Trace of urine metabolism in the model group during the experimental period; (D) the VIP diagram of OPLS-DA between the control group and the model group.
Fig. 3The bile acid-related pathways existing in the model group plotted by MetaboAnalyst 4.0. (a) Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism; (b) primary bile acid biosynthesis.
Fig. 4The canonical pathways affected by biomarkers. (A) The canonical pathways between the control group and the model group; (B) the canonical pathways between the mirabilite group and the model group.
Fig. 5The relationship of biomarkers and upstream proteins by IPA analysis. (A) The predicted network of the model biomarkers; (B) the predicted network of pharmacophore biomarkers.
Fig. 6(A) The histopathological analysis of each group; (B) immunohistochemistry test of FXR; (C) the mean density of FXR in each group. “*” indicates significant difference between model group and control group (p < 0.05); “#” indicates significant difference between model group and mirabilite group (p < 0.05).