BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is highly prevalent, and the vast majority of cases are thought to be sporadic, although few risk factors have been identified. Using metabolomics technology, our aim was to identify biomarkers prospectively associated with colorectal cancer. METHODS: This study included 254 incident colorectal cancers and 254 matched controls nested in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Serum samples were collected at baseline, and the mean length of follow-up was 8 years. Serum metabolites were analyzed by ultra-high performance liquid-phase chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for metabolites above the limit of detection and present in at least 80% of participants. RESULTS: A total of 676 serum metabolites were measured; of these, 447 were of known identity and 278 of these were present in >80% of individuals. Overall, there was no association between serum metabolites and colorectal cancer; however, some suggestive associations were observed between individual metabolites and colorectal cancer but none reached statistical significance after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. For example, leucyl-leucine was inversely associated (OR comparing the 90th to the 10th percentile = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.32-0.80; P = .003). In sex-stratified analyses, serum glycochenodeoxycholate was positively associated with colorectal cancer among women (OR(90th vs.10th percentile) = 5.34; 95% CI = 2.09-13.68; P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: No overall associations were observed between serum metabolites and colorectal cancer, but serum glycochenodeoxycholate, a bile acid metabolite, was positively associated with colorectal cancer among women.
BACKGROUND:Colorectal cancer is highly prevalent, and the vast majority of cases are thought to be sporadic, although few risk factors have been identified. Using metabolomics technology, our aim was to identify biomarkers prospectively associated with colorectal cancer. METHODS: This study included 254 incident colorectal cancers and 254 matched controls nested in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Serum samples were collected at baseline, and the mean length of follow-up was 8 years. Serum metabolites were analyzed by ultra-high performance liquid-phase chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for metabolites above the limit of detection and present in at least 80% of participants. RESULTS: A total of 676 serum metabolites were measured; of these, 447 were of known identity and 278 of these were present in >80% of individuals. Overall, there was no association between serum metabolites and colorectal cancer; however, some suggestive associations were observed between individual metabolites and colorectal cancer but none reached statistical significance after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. For example, leucyl-leucine was inversely associated (OR comparing the 90th to the 10th percentile = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.32-0.80; P = .003). In sex-stratified analyses, serum glycochenodeoxycholate was positively associated with colorectal cancer among women (OR(90th vs.10th percentile) = 5.34; 95% CI = 2.09-13.68; P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: No overall associations were observed between serum metabolites and colorectal cancer, but serum glycochenodeoxycholate, a bile acid metabolite, was positively associated with colorectal cancer among women.
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Esther K Wei; Graham A Colditz; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Bernard A Rosner Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jennifer E Ho; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Anahita Ghorbani; Susan Cheng; Eugene P Rhee; Jose C Florez; Clary B Clish; Robert E Gerszten; Thomas J Wang Journal: Diabetes Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Eline H van Roekel; Erikka Loftfield; Rachel S Kelly; Oana A Zeleznik; Krista A Zanetti Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 4.290
Authors: Shuji Ogino; Reiko Nishihara; Tyler J VanderWeele; Molin Wang; Akihiro Nishi; Paul Lochhead; Zhi Rong Qian; Xuehong Zhang; Kana Wu; Hongmei Nan; Kazuki Yoshida; Danny A Milner; Andrew T Chan; Alison E Field; Carlos A Camargo; Michelle A Williams; Edward L Giovannucci Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Fangyi Gu; Andriy Derkach; Neal D Freedman; Maria Teresa Landi; Demetrius Albanes; Stephanie J Weinstein; Alison M Mondul; Charles E Matthews; Kristin A Guertin; Qian Xiao; Wei Zheng; Xiao-Ou Shu; Joshua N Sampson; Steven C Moore; Neil E Caporaso Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Erikka Loftfield; Emily Vogtmann; Joshua N Sampson; Steven C Moore; Heidi Nelson; Rob Knight; Nicholas Chia; Rashmi Sinha Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Akihiro Nishi; Danny A Milner; Edward L Giovannucci; Reiko Nishihara; Andy S Tan; Ichiro Kawachi; Shuji Ogino Journal: Expert Rev Mol Diagn Date: 2015-12-04 Impact factor: 5.225