Literature DB >> 29309194

Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.

Benchi Wang1, Jan Theeuwes1.   

Abstract

The present study investigated whether statistical regularities can influence visual selection. We used the classic additional singleton task in which participants search for a salient shape singleton while ignoring a color distractor singleton. The color distractor singleton was systematically presented more often in 1 location than in all other locations. For this high-probability location, we found that both the amount of attentional capture by distractors and the efficiency of selecting the target were reduced. There was a spatial gradient of suppression, as the attentional capture effect and the efficiency of selecting the target scaled with the distance from the high-probability location. Some participants were aware of the statistical regularities, but this did not affect the results whatsoever. We interpret these findings as evidence that spatially statistical regularities that are unknown to the observer can influence attention such that locations that have a high probability of containing a distractor are suppressed relative to all other locations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29309194     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  59 in total

1.  Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.

Authors:  Rongqi Lin; Xinyu Li; Benchi Wang; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Awareness is necessary for attentional biases by location-reward association.

Authors:  Chisato Mine; Takemasa Yokoyama; Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Gaze dynamics of feature-based distractor inhibition under prior-knowledge and expectations.

Authors:  Wen Wen; Yangming Zhang; Sheng Li
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Martha Forloines; Zhiheng Zhou; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 6.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

7.  Feature-based guidance of attention by visual working memory is applied independently of remembered object location.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Brett Bahle
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Context isn't everything: Search performance is influenced by the nature of the task but not the background.

Authors:  Brett A Cochrane; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Oscar Ferrante; Francesco Marini; Elisa Santandrea; Luigi Cattaneo; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.