| Literature DB >> 35542286 |
Sanja Vlaisavljević1, Sanja Jelača2, Gökhan Zengin3, Neda Mimica-Dukić1, Sanja Berežni1, Milorad Miljić1, Zora Dajić Stevanović4.
Abstract
The current study was designed to evaluate the phytochemical profile and biological properties (antioxidant, enzyme inhibitory and cytotoxic activity) of methanolic, ethanolic, ethyl-acetate and water extracts of Alchemilla vulgaris from Southeast Serbia (central Balkan) which was traditionally used to alleviate and treat many diseases. Bioactive compounds were characterized by LC-MS/MS technique and biological properties were evaluated using antioxidant, enzyme inhibitory and cytotoxic assays. Twenty-six phenolic compounds were quantified in methanolic, ethanolic, ethyl acetate and water extracts, whereas the highest yields were found in ethyl-acetate (EA) extract (gallic acid, caffeic acid, catchin, quercetin). This extract has also shown the greatest antioxidant, anticancer and inhibitory enzyme activities which were demonstrated for the first time in this study. The obtained results indicated that Alchemilla vulgaris from South Serbia possesses high potential for pharmaceutical applications. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35542286 PMCID: PMC9075513 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra08231j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
The concentrations of selected phenols in Alchemilla vulgaris extracts obtained by LC-MS/MS
| Compounds | Quantification (μg g−1 dry weight) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeOH | EtOH | EA | H2O | |
|
| <loq | <loq | 135.45 ± 0.21 | <loq |
| Protocatechuic acid | <loq | <loq | 255.94 ± 0.36 | <loq |
| 2,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid | <loq | 74.00 ± 1.52 | 45.74 ± 0.01 | 3.35 ± 2.21 |
|
| 25.68 ± 1.12 | 23.02 ± 00.33 | 470.21 ± 0.44 | <loq |
| Gallic acid | <loq | <loq | 2465.79 ± 0.01 | <loq |
| Esculetin | <loq | <loq | 353.03 ± 0.11 | <loq |
| Caffeic acid | <loq | 69.19 ± 1.11 | 1138.54 ± 0.30 | <loq |
| Quinic acid | 284.56 ± 0.17 | 544.85 ± 0.90 | <loq | 157.99 ± 0.45 |
| Ferulic acid | <loq | <loq | 346.87 ± 0.12 | <loq |
| Genistein | <loq | <loq | 94.01 ± 0.10 | <loq |
| Apigenin | <loq | 16.30 ± 0.01 | 501.97 ± 0.41 | <loq |
| Naringenin | <loq | <loq | 15.40 ± 0.70 | <loq |
| Luteolin | 23.15 ± 0.44 | 50.88 ± 1.08 | 638.09 ± 0.02 | <loq |
| Kaempferol | <loq | <loq | 364.00 ± 0.22 | <loq |
| Catechin | 704.55 ± 0.54 | 396.16 ± 0.01 | 8144.98 ± 0.01 | <loq |
| Chrysoeriol | <loq | 6.714 ± 1.36 | 222.63 ± 0.99 | <loq |
| Quercetin | <loq | <loq | 4541.70 ± 0.04 | <loq |
| Chlorogenic acid | 258.01 ± 1.05 | 510.43 ± 1.66 | 23.13 ± 0.11 | 74.69 ± 0.33 |
| Apigenin-7- | 40.20 ± 2.11 | 119.61 ± 0.10 | 141.6 ± 0.15 | 6.43 ± 0.01 |
| Luteolin-7- | 903.94 ± 0.03 | 1186.34 ± 0.24 | 329.71 ± 0.04 | 106.65 ± 1.05 |
| Quercitrin | 84.58 ± 1.05 | 168.56 ± 2.02 | 70.37 ± 2.15 | 19.72 ± 0.01 |
| Kaempherol-3- | 195.55 ± 0.33 | 151.52 ± 1.05 | 1038.52 ± 1.01 | 30.75 ± 2.30 |
| Quercitrin-hexosides | 424.27 ± 0.55 | 853.40 ± 1.10 | 2274.85 ± 1.12 | 86.27 ± 1.45 |
| Rutin | 71.06 ± 0.05 | 64.63 ± 1.17 | <loq | 32.66 ± 2.05 |
Values are means ± SD of three measurement;
Evaluation of antioxidant potential and total phenolic contenta
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeOH | EtOH | EA | H2O | |
| DPPH˙ (mg TE per g extract) | 153.30 ± 0.013b | 95.99 ± 0.005d | 502.56 ± 0.01a | 89.25 ± 0.02c |
| ABTS˙+ (mg TE per g extract) | 143.55 ± 3.65b | 119.62 ± 3.20c | 174.05 ± 0.90a | 37.50 ± 0.39d |
| CUPRAC (mg TE per g extract) | 216.14 ± 6.86c | 203.53 ± 9.29b | 283.16 ± 12.36a | 78.56 ± 0.26d |
| Phosphomolibdenum (mmol TE per g extract) | 1.77 ± 0.01b | 1.57 ± 0.02b | 2.22 ± 0.07a | 0.53 ± 0.03c |
| Metal chelating (mg EDTAE per g extract) | 42.58 ± 0.26a | 42.32 ± 0.05a | 37.96 ± 1.29b | 39.23 ± 0.32b |
| Reducing power (mg EAA per g of extract) | 7899.45 ± 0.49b | 6405.75 ± 0.08c | 8745.31 ± 0.04a | 3240.09 ± 0.08d |
| Total phenolics content (mg GAE per g of extract) | 7.71 ± 0.01b | 7.40 ± 0.03b | 9.65 ± 0.02a | 6.89 ± 0.03b |
Values expressed are means ± S.D. of three parallel measurements; a–d means in the same row not sharing the same superscript are significantly different (p < 0.05); TE: trolox equivalent; EDTAE: EDTA equivalent; GAE: gallic acid equivalent.
Enzyme inhibitory effects of Alchemilla vulgaris extractsa
| Enzyme inhibition assays |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeOH | EtOH | EA | H2O | |
| AChE inhibition (mg GALAE per g extract) | 5.17 ± 0.02a | 5.14 ± 0.01a | 5.21 ± 0.05a | 5.17 ± 0.02a |
| BChE inhibition (mg GALAE per g extract) | 9.59 ± 0.14a | 9.71 ± 0.09a | 9.61 ± 0.02a | 10.19 ± 0.16a |
| Tyrosinase inhibition (mg KAE per g extract) | 79.84 ± 1.61a | 78.55 ± 3.83a | 77.66 ± 2.64a | 73.68 ± 2.11b |
| Amylase inhibition (mmol ACAE per g extract) | 0.34 ± 0.04a | 0.32 ± 0.03a | 0.41 ± 0.03a | 0.22 ± 0.03b |
Values expressed are means ± S.D. of three parallel measurements. In each row different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05); GALAE: galatamine equivalent; KAE: kojic acid equivalent; ACAE: acarbose equivalent.
IC50 values of effect Alchemilla vulgaris extracts in cytotoxicity
| Cell line | Assay | IC50 (μg mL−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeOH | EtOH | EA | H2O | ||
| A2780 | MTT | 27.9 ± 1.9 | 40.3 ± 0.4 | 43.3 ± 0.9 | 67 ± 2.4 |
| CV | 38.3 ± 1.1 | 43.9 ± 0.1 | 42.6 ± 1.3 | 78.4 ± 1.9 | |
| HeLa | MTT | 80.6 ± 6.3 | 84.75 ± 5 | 46.4 ± 5.1 | >100 |
| CV | >100 | >100 | 53.8 ± 3.9 | >100 | |
| MCF7 | MTT | 41.9 ± 0.6 | 58.7 ± 1.6 | 31.3 ± 1.5 | 94.1 ± 1.2 |
| CV | 47.2 ± 0.4 | 64.4 ± 0.1 | 37.5 ± 5 | 95 ± 7.1 | |
| PC-3 | MTT | 54.4 ± 2.5 | 43.5 ± 1.1 | 18.7 ± 0.9 | >100 |
| CV | 73.5 ± 4.2 | 61.1 ± 4.7 | 31.7 ± 0.3 | >100 | |
Fig. 1Effect of Alchemilla vulgaris extracts on different tumor cell lines.