| Literature DB >> 35539530 |
Mengxia Wang1, Xiaojun Zhang1, Yuanyuan Wang2, Yuan Li1, Yongxiong Chen1, Haihui Zheng3, Fangli Ma2, Chung Wah Ma2, Biyu Lu1, Zhiyong Xie3, Qiongfeng Liao1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of probiotics combined with prebiotics (PP) supplementation on weaned rat metabolism. A metabonomic strategy employing 1H-NMR spectroscopy and multivariate data analysis was used to examine weaned rat biological responses to PP supplementation. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (post-natal day 21, PD 21) received probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM (L-NCFM) and Bifidobacterium lactis Bi-07 (B-LBi07), 1 : 1, 1.0 × 1011 cfu kg-1) and prebiotics (Lycium barbarum polysaccharides (LBP), Poria cocos polysaccharides (PCPs) and Lentinan, 1 : 1 : 1, 24 g kg-1) via intragastric administration for 28 consecutive days. Urine and feces were collected for analysis. Significant topographical metabolic variations were present in urine and feces. Urinary metabolites upregulated by PP treatment included alanine, N-acetylglycine, glutamine, dimethylamine, phosphorylcholine, ethylene glycol, mannitol, phenylacetylglycine and glycoate, which were related to alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, and choline metabolism. Feces-derived metabolites, including caproate, valerate, butyrate, propionate, lactate, acetate, succinate, methanol, threonine and methionine, were significantly increased, which were related to short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) metabolism and TCA cycle metabolism. These results indicate that dietary PP supplementation can regulate common systemic metabolic processes, including energy metabolism, amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism, nucleic acid metabolism, and gut microbiota-related metabolism. This study also illuminates the vital role of PP supplementation in regulating the metabolism of weaned rats. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35539530 PMCID: PMC9078034 DOI: 10.1039/c7ra12067b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1Representative 600 MHz 1H-NMR spectra obtained from urine extracts (A) and feces extracts (B) at day 28 post treatment. Metabolite keys are shown in Tables S1 and S2.†
Fig. 21H-NMR-based metabonomic analysis of urine samples. PCA (A) and PLS-DA (B) score plots derived from the 1H-NMR spectra of urine extracts obtained from CON and PP groups, and cross validation (C) by permutation test at day 28. OPLS-DA (D) score plot and coefficient plot (E) derived from the 1H-NMR spectra of urine extracts showing the discrimination between CON and PP groups at day 28. Keys to metabolites assignment are given in Table 1.
Statistical analysis results of the main metabolite change in urine at days 14 and 28a
| Key | Metabolites | Chemical shift | Variations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 14 | Day 28 | |||
| 1 | Leucine | 0.925(d), 0.936(s), 1.703(m), 3.725(d) | — | ↓** |
| 2 | Ketoleucine | 0.944(d), 2.10(m), 2.617(d) | ↓* | ↓** |
| 3 | 3-Hydroxyisovalerate | 1.275(s), 2.357(s) | ↓** | ↓** |
| 4 | Alanine | 1.489(d), 3.780(q) | ↑* | ↑* |
| 5 | Ornithine | 1.775(m), 1.828(m), 1.929(m), 3.044(t), 3.782(d) | — | ↓** |
| 6 | Acetate | 1.927(s) | ↓* | ↓** |
| 7 | Proline | 2.023(m), 2.334(m), 3.320(m), 3.392(m), 4.147(t) | ↓** | ↓** |
| 8 |
| 2.044(s), 3.763(d), 7.997(s) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 9 | Glutamate | 2.056(m), 2.334(m), 3.741(q) | ↓** | ↓** |
| 10 | Glutamine | 2.109(m), 2.141(m), 2.425(m), 2.462(m), 3.766(t), 6.872(s), 7.589(s) | ↑* | ↑* |
| 11 | Acetone | 2.229(s) | ↓** | ↓* |
| 12 |
| 2.347(s), 7.217(d), 7.293(d) | ↓** | ↓** |
| 13 |
| 2.299(s), 7.055(m), 7.237(m) | ↓* | ↓* |
| 14 | 2-Oxoglutarate | 2.429(t), 2.995(t) | — | ↓** |
| 15 | Citrate | 2.552(d), 2.658(d) | ↓* | ↓** |
| 16 | Methylamine | 2.613(s) | — | ↓** |
| 17 | Dimethylamine | 2.719(s) | ↑* | ↑* |
| 18 | Methylguanidine | 2.828(s), 3.356(s) | — | ↓** |
| 19 | Asparagine | 2.862(dd), 2.962(m), 3.995(dd) | ↓** | ↓** |
| 20 | Trimethylamine | 2.885(s) | — | ↓* |
| 21 | Creatinine | 3.043(s), 4.052(s) | — | ↓** |
| 22 |
| 3.109(s) | ↓** | ↓** |
| 23 |
| 2.917(s), 4.078(s) | ↓* | ↓* |
| 24 | Choline | 3.191(s), 3.504(t), 4.085(m) | ↓** | ↓** |
| 25 | Phosphorylcholine | 3.203(s), 3.671(t), 4.190(dd) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 26 | Ethylene glycol | 3.662(s) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 27 | Mannitol | 3.677(dd), 3.770(m), 3.805(d), 3.873(dd) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 28 | Phenylacetylglycine | 3.680(s), 3.746(d), 7.365(t), 7.425(t) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 29 | Glycolate | 3.932(t) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 30 | Benzoate | 7.474(t), 7.546(t), 7.863(d) | — | ↓* |
| 31 | Xanthine | 7.909(s) | ↓** | ↓* |
| 32 | Formate | 8.467(s) | — | ↓* |
*: indicates significant changes compared with control *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Fig. 3Relative changes for metabolite concentrations in urine induced by PP supplementation at day 14 (A) and day 28 (B). Solid bars indicate significant changes with red for increase and blue for decrease, whereas hollow bars mean no significant changes. Keys to metabolites assignment are given in Table 1.
Fig. 41H-NMR-based metabonomic analysis of feces samples. PCA (A) and PLS-DA (B) score plots derived from the 1H-NMR spectra of feces extracts obtained from CON and PP groups, and cross validation (C) by permutation test at day 28. OPLS-DA (D) score plot and coefficient plot (E) derived from the 1H-NMR spectra of feces extracts showing the discrimination between CON and PP groups at day 28. Keys to metabolites assignment are given in Table 2.
Statistical analysis results of the main metabolite change in feces at days 14 and 28a
| Key | Metabolites | Chemical shift | Variations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 14 | Day 28 | |||
| 1 | Caproate | 0.887(t), 1.292(m), 1.309(m), 1.556(m), 2.178(t) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 2 | Valerate | 0.899(t), 1.309(m), 2.178(d) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 3 | Butyrate | 0.899(t), 1.562(m), 2.150(t) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 4 | Isoleucine | 0.936(t), 0.995(d), 1.249(m), 1.452(m), 1.971(m), 3.655(d) | ↓* | ↓* |
| 5 | Valine | 0.979(d), 1.013(d), 2.275(m), 3.617(d) | ↓** | ↓** |
| 6 | Propionate | 1.061(t), 2.191(d) | ↑* | ↑* |
| 7 | α-Ketoisovalerate | 1.127(d), 3.022(m) | ↓* | ↓* |
| 8 | Lactate | 1.331(d), 4.115(q) | ↓* | ↑** |
| 9 | Cadaverine | 1.483(d), 1.724(m), 3.022(t) | ↓* | ↓* |
| 10 | Alanine | 1.489(d), 3.780(q) | ↓* | ↓* |
| 11 | Acetate | 1.927(s) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 12 | Pyruvate | 2.373(s) | ↓* | ↓* |
| 13 | Succinate | 2.413(s) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 14 | Creatine | 3.028(s), 3.926(s) | — | ↓* |
| 15 | Taurine | 3.243(t), 3.435(t) | — | ↓* |
| 16 | Methanol | 3.366(s) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 17 | Glycine | 3.566(s) | ↓** | ↓** |
| 18 | Threonine | 1.330(d), 3.579(d), 4.269(m) | ↓* | ↑** |
| 19 | Trimethylamine | 2.871(s) | ↓* | ↓* |
| 20 | 5-Aminovalerate | 1.624(t), 1.650(t), 2.237(m), 3.022(m) | ↓* | ↓* |
| 21 | Methionine | 2.141(s), 2.169(m), 2.648(t), 3.853(m) | ↑** | ↑** |
| 22 | Lysine | 1.415(m), 1.719(m), 1.869(m), 3.018(t), 3.741(t) | ↓* | ↓* |
*: indicates significant changes compared with control *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Fig. 5Relative changes for metabolite concentrations in feces induced by PP supplementation at day 14 (A) and day 28 (B). Solid bars indicate significant changes with red for increase and blue for decrease, whereas hollow bars mean no significant changes. Keys to metabolites assignment are given in Table 2.
Fig. 6Correlation of urinary metabolite NMR peak areas (A) and feces metabolite NMR peak areas (B). Red denotes a positive correlation and blue a negative correlation. Network analysis of urinary metabolites (C) and feces metabolites (D) with |r| ≥ 0.9. Nodes colored red for up-regulation, green for down-regulation. Red lines correspond to positive correlations, whereas bluelines correspond to negative correlations.
Fig. 7Potential pathways for PP supplementation in urine extracts identified by using MSEA pathway analysis. (A) (a) Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, (b) valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis, (c) glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism. (B) Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism. (C) Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis. (D) Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism.
Fig. 8Potential pathways for PP supplementation in feces extracts identified by using MSEA pathway analysis. (A) (a) Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, (b) pyruvate metabolism, (c) valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis. (B) Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism. (C) Pyruvate metabolism. (D) Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis.
Meaningful metabolic pathways of urine from MSEA
| Pathway name | Match status |
| FDR | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | 3/16 | 0.0030212 | 0.081572 | 0.44445 |
| Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism | 4/24 | 8.93 × 10−4 | 0.036147 | 0.21308 |
| Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis | 2/11 | 0.017656 | 0.28603 | 0.33333 |
| Arginine and proline metabolism | 3/44 | 0.049895 | 0.63457 | 0.19136 |
| Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) | 2/20 | 0.054839 | 0.63457 | 0.12155 |
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 2/30 | 0.1117 | 1 | 0.06759 |
| Pyruvate metabolism | 1/22 | 1.0493 | 1 | 0.05583 |
| Purine metabolism | 2/68 | 0.96713 | 1 | 0.0329 |
| Glycolysis or gluconeogenesis | 1/26 | 0.91722 | 1 | 0.02862 |
| Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation | 2/38 | 1.8045 | 1 | 0.0119 |
Meaningful metabolic pathways of feces from MSEA
| Pathway name | Match status |
| FDR | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis | 3/11 | 3.81 × 10−4 | 0.015448 | 0.66666 |
| Pyruvate metabolism | 3/22 | 0.0032192 | 0.052152 | 0.42857 |
| Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism | 4/32 | 8.40 × 10−4 | 0.022667 | 0.29197 |
| Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism | 1/8 | 0.0032192 | 0.58775 | 0.24337 |
| Glycolysis or gluconeogenesis | 3/26 | 0.0052399 | 0.060633 | 0.12753 |
| Cysteine and methionine metabolism | 3/28 | 0.058559 | 0.39527 | 0.11567 |
| Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) | 2/20 | 0.031505 | 0.25519 | 0.0975 |
| Primary bile acid biosynthesis | 2/46 | 0.13778 | 0.65648 | 0.05952 |
| Arginine and proline metabolism | 1/44 | 0.47385 | 1 | 0.01198 |
| Glutathione metabolism | 2/26 | 0.05121 | 0.37709 | 0.00573 |
Fig. 9Shotgun sequencing validates the predicted microbial metabolic trends in a small subset of feces samples from the different two groups (CON group and PP group).
Fig. 10Metabolic pathways altered by PP supplementation. (↑) Up-regulated; (↓) down-regulated; red colour, feces; blue colour, urine; green, feces and urine.