BACKGROUND: Diversity in dietary intake contributes to variation in human metabolomic profiles and artifacts from acute dietary intake can affect metabolomics data. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the role of dietary phytochemicals on shaping human urinary metabolomic profiles. DESIGN: First void urine samples were collected from 21 healthy volunteers (12 women, 9 men) following their normal diet (ND), a 2-d low-phytochemical diet (LPD), or a 2-d standard phytochemical diet (SPD). Nutrient intake was assessed during the study. Urine samples were analyzed by using (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS), which was followed by multivariate data analysis. RESULTS: Macronutrient intake did not change throughout the study. Partial least-squares-discriminant analysis indicated a clear distinction between the LPD samples and the ND and SPD samples, relating to creatinine and methylhistidine excretion after the LPD and hippurate excretion after the ND and SPD. The predictive power of the LPD versus the ND model was 74 +/- 3% and 82 +/- 6% with the (1)H NMR and MS data sets, respectively. The predictive power of the LPD versus the SPD model was 83 +/- 8% and 69 +/- 4% for the (1)H NMR and MS data sets respectively. A cross platform comparison of both data sets by co-inertia analysis showed a similar distinction between the LPD and SPD. CONCLUSIONS: Acute changes in urinary metabolomic profiles occur after the consumption of dietary phytochemicals. Dietary restrictions in the 24 h before sample collection may reduce diversity in phytochemical intakes and therefore reduce variation and improve data interpretation in metabolomics studies using urine.
BACKGROUND: Diversity in dietary intake contributes to variation in human metabolomic profiles and artifacts from acute dietary intake can affect metabolomics data. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the role of dietary phytochemicals on shaping human urinary metabolomic profiles. DESIGN: First void urine samples were collected from 21 healthy volunteers (12 women, 9 men) following their normal diet (ND), a 2-d low-phytochemical diet (LPD), or a 2-d standard phytochemical diet (SPD). Nutrient intake was assessed during the study. Urine samples were analyzed by using (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS), which was followed by multivariate data analysis. RESULTS: Macronutrient intake did not change throughout the study. Partial least-squares-discriminant analysis indicated a clear distinction between the LPD samples and the ND and SPD samples, relating to creatinine and methylhistidine excretion after the LPD and hippurate excretion after the ND and SPD. The predictive power of the LPD versus the ND model was 74 +/- 3% and 82 +/- 6% with the (1)H NMR and MS data sets, respectively. The predictive power of the LPD versus the SPD model was 83 +/- 8% and 69 +/- 4% for the (1)H NMR and MS data sets respectively. A cross platform comparison of both data sets by co-inertia analysis showed a similar distinction between the LPD and SPD. CONCLUSIONS: Acute changes in urinary metabolomic profiles occur after the consumption of dietary phytochemicals. Dietary restrictions in the 24 h before sample collection may reduce diversity in phytochemical intakes and therefore reduce variation and improve data interpretation in metabolomics studies using urine.
Authors: Lone G Rasmussen; Hanne Winning; Francesco Savorani; Christian Ritz; Søren B Engelsen; Arne Astrup; Thomas M Larsen; Lars O Dragsted Journal: Genes Nutr Date: 2011-10-09 Impact factor: 5.523
Authors: John van Duynhoven; Elaine E Vaughan; Doris M Jacobs; Robèr A Kemperman; Ewoud J J van Velzen; Gabriele Gross; Laure C Roger; Sam Possemiers; Age K Smilde; Joël Doré; Johan A Westerhuis; Tom Van de Wiele Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-06-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Robert W Haile; Esther M John; A Joan Levine; Victoria K Cortessis; Jennifer B Unger; Melissa Gonzales; Elad Ziv; Patricia Thompson; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Katherine L Tucker; Jonine L Bernstein; Thomas E Rohan; Gloria Y F Ho; Melissa L Bondy; Maria Elena Martinez; Linda Cook; Mariana C Stern; Marcia Cruz Correa; Jonelle Wright; Seth J Schwartz; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Victoria Blinder; Patricia Miranda; Richard Hayes; George Friedman-Jiménez; Kristine R Monroe; Christopher A Haiman; Brian E Henderson; Duncan C Thomas; Paolo Boffetta Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2012-02
Authors: Jennifer T Smilowitz; Aifric O'Sullivan; Daniela Barile; J Bruce German; Bo Lönnerdal; Carolyn M Slupsky Journal: J Nutr Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Kristen L Jablonski; Jelena Klawitter; Michel Chonchol; Candace J Bassett; Matthew L Racine; Douglas R Seals Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Damon H May; Sandi L Navarro; Ingo Ruczinski; Jason Hogan; Yuko Ogata; Yvonne Schwarz; Lisa Levy; Ted Holzman; Martin W McIntosh; Johanna W Lampe Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 3.718