BACKGROUND: Advances in surgery have considerably lowered postoperative morbidity. However, infection remains a considerable morbidity factor. The aim of this review is to identify the potential benefit(s) of the perioperative administration of probiotics/synbiotics to patients undergoing abdominal surgery. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied the perioperative administration of probiotics/synbiotics to patients undergoing abdominal surgery. RESULTS: Nine RCTs studying 733 patients were included in our review. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia, cholangitis, and any infections as well as the duration of postoperative hospital stay and length of antibiotic therapy were lower among patients receiving probiotics than in the control group [six RCTs, 355 patients, odds ratio (OR) 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.68; three RCTs, 209 patients, OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.57; seven RCTs, 514 patients, OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.55; five RCTs, 313 patients, OR -2.70, 95% CI -5.15 to -0.25; four RCTs, 250 patients, OR -4.01, 95% CI -5.11 to -2.92, respectively], while the incidence of postoperative wound infection, urinary tract infection, intra-abdominal abscess, and mortality was not different between patients of the compared groups (six RCTs, 355 patients, OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.23-1.18; five RCTs, 313 patients, OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.04-5.54; four RCTs, 226 patients, OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.12-1.59; nine RCTs, 685 patients, OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.29-3.29, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of probiotics/synbiotics may reduce postoperative infections after abdominal surgery. This is a promising infection-preventive measure that may decrease morbidity, length of antibiotic therapy, duration of hospital stay, and pressure for emergence of antimicrobial resistance. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the significant heterogeneity of the studies included.
BACKGROUND: Advances in surgery have considerably lowered postoperative morbidity. However, infection remains a considerable morbidity factor. The aim of this review is to identify the potential benefit(s) of the perioperative administration of probiotics/synbiotics to patients undergoing abdominal surgery. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied the perioperative administration of probiotics/synbiotics to patients undergoing abdominal surgery. RESULTS: Nine RCTs studying 733 patients were included in our review. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia, cholangitis, and any infections as well as the duration of postoperative hospital stay and length of antibiotic therapy were lower among patients receiving probiotics than in the control group [six RCTs, 355 patients, odds ratio (OR) 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.68; three RCTs, 209 patients, OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.57; seven RCTs, 514 patients, OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.55; five RCTs, 313 patients, OR -2.70, 95% CI -5.15 to -0.25; four RCTs, 250 patients, OR -4.01, 95% CI -5.11 to -2.92, respectively], while the incidence of postoperative wound infection, urinary tract infection, intra-abdominal abscess, and mortality was not different between patients of the compared groups (six RCTs, 355 patients, OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.23-1.18; five RCTs, 313 patients, OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.04-5.54; four RCTs, 226 patients, OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.12-1.59; nine RCTs, 685 patients, OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.29-3.29, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of probiotics/synbiotics may reduce postoperative infections after abdominal surgery. This is a promising infection-preventive measure that may decrease morbidity, length of antibiotic therapy, duration of hospital stay, and pressure for emergence of antimicrobial resistance. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the significant heterogeneity of the studies included.
Authors: Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Marc G Besselink; Harro M Timmerman; L Paul van Minnen; Louis M Akkermans; Hein G Gooszen Journal: Surgery Date: 2007-11-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Nada Rayes; Daniel Seehofer; Tom Theruvath; Reinhold A Schiller; Jan M Langrehr; Sven Jonas; Stig Bengmark; Peter Neuhaus Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Mary Ann De Groote; Daniel N Frank; Elaine Dowell; Mary P Glode; Norman R Pace Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Marc Gh Besselink; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Erik Buskens; Marja A Boermeester; Harry van Goor; Harro M Timmerman; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; Thomas L Bollen; Bert van Ramshorst; Ben Jm Witteman; Camiel Rosman; Rutger J Ploeg; Menno A Brink; Alexander Fm Schaapherder; Cornelis Hc Dejong; Peter J Wahab; Cees Jhm van Laarhoven; Erwin van der Harst; Casper Hj van Eijck; Miguel A Cuesta; Louis Ma Akkermans; Hein G Gooszen Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rebecca A Schroeder; Carlos E Marroquin; Barbara Phillips Bute; Shukri Khuri; William G Henderson; Paul C Kuo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Daniel Seehofer; Nada Rayes; Reinhard Schiller; Martin Stockmann; Andrea R Müller; Anja Schirmeier; Frank Schaeper; Stefan G Tullius; Stig Bengmark; Peter Neuhaus Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Lindsay M Urben; Jennifer Wiedmar; Erica Boettcher; Rodrigo Cavallazzi; Robert G Martindale; Stephen A McClave Journal: Curr Gastroenterol Rep Date: 2014