| Literature DB >> 35530527 |
Enny Widyati1, Ragil Sb Irianto1, Adi Susilo1.
Abstract
Cutting trees removes all parts of their photosynthetic area, which affects rhizosphere assembly. However, information regarding the underground alteration process after tree cutting is insufficient. This study aimed to observe the fate of both root exudation and the rhizosphere microbial community following tree cutting. The study included 540 Calliandra calothyrsus Meissn. The experimental layout was a completely randomized block design with 3 blocks (cutting age) × 2 (cutting and not cutting) × 180 trees. Composite soil samples were collected from trees at 0-20 cm depth and stumps at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after cutting to observe the soil sugar content, pH, and functional group population. This study demonstrated that cutting reduced the flux of sugars below ground by 80% and caused rapid acidification (pH less than 5.0) of the soil. Total soil sugar depletion is presumed to be a mechanism by which C. calothyrsus survives and regrows after cutting. Sugar depletion affects significant shifts in the size and structure of the rhizosphere microbial community. Increasing soil acidity is another survival strategy to limit close competitor populations in the rhizosphere. This study confirms that C. calothyrsus is a proper species for developing in the coppice-harvesting-system (CHS) energy estate.Entities:
Keywords: Belowground sugar; coppice; cutting; functional groups; rhizosphere
Year: 2022 PMID: 35530527 PMCID: PMC9067525 DOI: 10.1080/19420889.2022.2068110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Commun Integr Biol ISSN: 1942-0889
Summary of ANOVA analysis (p-value) on the influence of tree-cutting on the total soil sugars and microbial communities in the rhizosphere*
| Factors | Total soil sugar | Population of soil microbes | Number of nodules | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS | CMC | BNF-FL | |||
| Age (A) | 0.753 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Cutting (C) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Time of sampling (S) | 0.026 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.080 |
| (A*C) | 0.372 | 0.714 | 0.467 | 0.689 | 0.211 |
| (C*S) | 0.991 | 0.364 | 0.295 | 0.236 | 0.969 |
* α = 0.05; df = 539.
Figure 1.Dynamic of total soil sugar (TSS) in C. calothyrsus stump rhizosphere. The TSS contents reduce drastically a week after felling and continually deplete until the 4th week. All cutting treatments show, the TSS start increasing in the 8th week after felling. The TSS contents of the uncut group remain stable during the experiment. (Solid line: uncut trees; dotted line: cut trees).
Figure 2.Dynamic of soil acidity in C. calothyrsus stump rhizosphere. All cut treatments show the soil pH immediately decreased a week after felling, except the group of 12 month age, the lowest pH happen at the 2nd week after felling. The rhizosphere pH then gradually increased until at the 12th week after cutting closer to the initial situation. There is no fluctuation in the soil acidity of the uncut treatments during the observations. (Solid line: uncut trees; dotted line: cut trees).
Figure 3.Microbes behavior in rhizosphere after cutting; (a) Phosphate solubilizer (PS), (b) Cellulose Microbes (CMC), (c) Biological Nitrogen Fixation – Free Living (BNF-FL), (d) Effective nodule represented by rhizobia. All functional groups population deplete a week after felling. The least affected is cellulose degrader (CMC) (Figure 3(a)) while the most impacted is rhizobia which are colonized in the root nodules (Figure 3(d)). (Solid line: uncut trees; dotted line: cut trees).
Diminution of the soil-microbe population in the rhizosphere of stumps compared to that in uncut stands of a similar age (%)*
| Week of sampling | PSM | CMC degraders | BNF-FL | Effective nodules | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 18 | 24 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 12 | 18 | 24 | |
| Month | Month | Month | Month | |||||||||
| 1 | 29.14 | 29.38 | 9.18 | 4.76 | 13.19 | 21.53 | 4.76 | 13.19 | 21.53 | 10.99 | 63.94 | 32.13 |
| 2 | 43.20 | 34.08 | 16.74 | 31.32 | 12.46 | 29.53 | 31.32 | 12.46 | 29.53 | 54.70 | 79.06 | 62.70 |
| 4 | 51.40 | 39.85 | 11.06 | 34.84 | 16.15 | 30.73 | 34.84 | 10.19 | 30.73 | 72.03 | 80.51 | 75.03 |
| 8 | 25.83 | 26.88 | 17.56 | 23.05 | 14.60 | 20.56 | 23.05 | 16.22 | 20.56 | 58.33 | 57.78 | 70.18 |
| 12 | 21.27 | 22.61 | 21.49 | 20.92 | 14.02 | 13.51 | 20.92 | 19.61 | 13.51 | 51.94 | 43.10 | 48.73 |
*percentage of diminution = [(uncut population – cut population)/uncut population] x 100%.
Percentage of TSS depletion due to tree cutting
| Week of observation | Plant’s age of cutting | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 month | 18 month | 24 month | |
| 0 | 15.04 | 1.84 | 1.23 |
| 1 | 52.98 | 31.27 | 40.64 |
| 2 | 63.89 | 63.13 | 62.43 |
| 4 | 80.87 | 70.95 | 69.51 |
| 8 | 63.61 | 49.56 | 60.95 |
| 12 | 39.61 | 41.65 | 57.29 |