Xinjie Wang1, Mingtian Zhong2, Yong Liu3,4, Peixiang Ma1, Lu Dang5, Qingzhou Meng5, Wenwei Wan6, Xiaodong Ma2, Jia Liu1, Guang Yang1, Zifeng Yang3, Xingxu Huang6, Ming Liu3. 1. Shanghai Institute for Advanced Immunochemical Studies, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China. 2. Institute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China. 3. State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China. 4. Kingmed Virology Diagnostic & Translational Center, Guangzhou Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510005, China. 5. Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China. 6. School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
The outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has had a significant impact on global health. To advance the diagnostic method of COVID-19, we developed a CRISPR/Cas12a-based assay with a naked eye readout, CRISPR/Cas12a-NER. The assay can detect as few as 10 copies of the virus gene in 45 min without a special instrument and has good consistency with the qPCR assay, providing a simple and reliable on-site diagnostic method suitable for a local hospital or community testing.The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) had caused more than 1,991,562 confirmed cases with 130,885 deaths by 16 April 2020 (World Health Organization Coronavirus disease 2019 situation reports). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection leads to the disease [1]. SARS-CoV-2, a positive-sense virus, belongs to Betacoronavirus genus lineage β and is phylogenetically closely related to bat SARS-like coronaviruses [2].Sensitive and rapid detection of COVID-19 is crucial in controlling the outbreak. Currently, real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays are recommended as molecular diagnostic methods [3], [4]. However, qPCR requires an elaborate instrument and professional operation, which limits its diagnostic application. Recently, a CRISPR/Cas-based nucleic acid detection technology was developed with the advantages of sensitivity, specificity, rapidity, and simplicity [5], [6]. To advance the on-site diagnosis of COVID-19, we introduce a CRISPR/Cas12a-based rapid detection assay.To sensitively and rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid, CRISPR/Cas12a-based-detection with naked eye readout, termed CRISPR/Cas12a-NER, including the Cas12a protein, SARS-CoV-2 specific CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) and a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) reporter, was developed as shown in Fig. 1
a. To enable on-site diagnosis, an ssDNA reporter labelled with a quenched green fluorescent molecule was introduced, which will be cleaved by Cas12a when there is nucleic acid of SARS-CoV-2 in the detection system, and the resulting green fluorescence can be seen with the naked eye under 485 nm light (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1
CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection with naked eye readout (CRISPR/Cas12a-NER) of SARS-CoV-2. (a) Schematic of Cas12a-based assay for rapid and visual nucleic acid detection. After 30 min of RT-RAA reaction, the Cas12a enzyme targets cleavage for an additional 15 min. The green fluorescent signals can be observed by the naked eye under blue light with a wavelength of 485 nm. (b) Four target gene fragments and SARS-CoV-2-specific crRNAs location on the genome. (c) Validation of crRNA specifically reacts with the target gene. (d) Time course of E gene detection with E-crRNAmix on gradient diluted input RNAs from 1e4 to 1e0 copies. (e) Sensitivity assay using E-crRNAmix to detect gradient diluted E gene RNA from 1e4 to 1e0 copies. (f) Diagnostic accuracy of CRISPR/Cas12a-NER on the diagnosis of COVID-19 clinical samples. ***: statistical significance; NS: not significance.
CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection with naked eye readout (CRISPR/Cas12a-NER) of SARS-CoV-2. (a) Schematic of Cas12a-based assay for rapid and visual nucleic acid detection. After 30 min of RT-RAA reaction, the Cas12a enzyme targets cleavage for an additional 15 min. The green fluorescent signals can be observed by the naked eye under blue light with a wavelength of 485 nm. (b) Four target gene fragments and SARS-CoV-2-specific crRNAs location on the genome. (c) Validation of crRNA specifically reacts with the target gene. (d) Time course of E gene detection with E-crRNAmix on gradient diluted input RNAs from 1e4 to 1e0 copies. (e) Sensitivity assay using E-crRNAmix to detect gradient diluted E gene RNA from 1e4 to 1e0 copies. (f) Diagnostic accuracy of CRISPR/Cas12a-NER on the diagnosis of COVID-19 clinical samples. ***: statistical significance; NS: not significance.For specific detection of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, a total of 15 crRNAs, which are predicted to distinguish single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with other SARS or SARS-related viruses, were designed on four domains of the orf1a, orf1b, N and E genes over the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain (GenBank accession number MN908947) (Fig. 1b, Fig. S1 online). The results showed that 14 crRNAs, except the E-crRNA1, targeting SARS-CoV-2 were validated, and all of them highly and specifically reacted with synthetic gene fragments (Fig. 1c, Figs. S2 and S3 online). As the CRISPR/Cas12a-NER readout signal relies on the crRNA-dependent targeting cleavage efficiency, which is affected by the secondary structure and spacer sequence of the crRNA [7], [8]. The crRNAmix (equal mix work crRNAs targeting at each gene, named orf1a-crRNAmix, orf1b-crRNAmix, N-crRNAmix, E-crRNAmix) mediated the strongest fluorescence signal (Fig. S4 online) and was chosen for the detection of COVID-19.As SARS-CoV-2 is an RNA virus, reverse transcript recombinase-aided amplification (RT-RAA) was combined to obtain enough DNA for Cas12a-mediated detection. The RT-RAA will amplify the target gene fragment in 30 min at 39 °C, followed by a CRISPR/Cas12a reaction at 37 °C (Fig. 1a). Cas12a-mediated detection produces a robust signal in a 15 min reaction (Fig. 1d), and then the assay time is fixed to 15 min. The sensitivity of the CRISPR/Cas12a-NER assay was determined by the fluorescence intensities. The results show that among the four target genes, the E-crRNAmix for the target E gene is the most sensitive, which can clearly detect 10 copies of SARS-CoV-2synthetic nucleic acid (Fig. 1e, Fig. S5 online). Thus, we chose E-crRNAmix for a screening assay of SARS-CoV-2, and the remaining target genes can be used for a further confirmed diagnostic assay.To validate the CRISPR/Cas12a-NER diagnostic accuracy, a total of 31 clinically extracted RNA samples were used for COVID-19 detection with the CRISPR/Cas12a-NER assay and TaqMan qPCR (GenScript, Nanjing, China) for the E gene in parallel. Clinical samples used in this study were collected and treated in strict accordance with the standard operation for COVID-19 recommended by the World Health Organization. All sample treatments were conducted in the State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease and Kingmed Virology Diagnostic & Translational Center (Guangzhou). Among these samples, consistent with clinical diagnosis, 16 were determined to be SARS-CoV-2 positive by both CRISPR/Cas12a-NER and qPCR assays and showed 100% agreement (Fig. 1f, Figs. S6 and S7 online), with the kappa value (κ) being 1.0 (P < 0.001) (Table S3 online), confirming the outstanding performance of CRISPR/Cas12a-NER.Overall, we described CRISPR/Cas12a-NER, which provides a novel alternative for the portable, simple, sensitive, and specific detection of the COVID-19 virus, providing a simple and reliable on-site diagnostic method suitable for a local hospital or community testing.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Authors: Jonathan S Gootenberg; Omar O Abudayyeh; Jeong Wook Lee; Patrick Essletzbichler; Aaron J Dy; Julia Joung; Vanessa Verdine; Nina Donghia; Nichole M Daringer; Catherine A Freije; Cameron Myhrvold; Roby P Bhattacharyya; Jonathan Livny; Aviv Regev; Eugene V Koonin; Deborah T Hung; Pardis C Sabeti; James J Collins; Feng Zhang Journal: Science Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sjoerd C A Creutzburg; Wen Y Wu; Prarthana Mohanraju; Thomas Swartjes; Ferhat Alkan; Jan Gorodkin; Raymond H J Staals; John van der Oost Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Daniel K W Chu; Yang Pan; Samuel M S Cheng; Kenrie P Y Hui; Pavithra Krishnan; Yingzhi Liu; Daisy Y M Ng; Carrie K C Wan; Peng Yang; Quanyi Wang; Malik Peiris; Leo L M Poon Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Janice S Chen; Enbo Ma; Lucas B Harrington; Maria Da Costa; Xinran Tian; Joel M Palefsky; Jennifer A Doudna Journal: Science Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Armando Hernandez-Garcia; Melissa D Morales-Moreno; Erick G Valdés-Galindo; Eric P Jimenez-Nieto; Andrea Quezada Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-06-10
Authors: Keith J M Moore; Jeremy Cahill; Guy Aidelberg; Rachel Aronoff; Ali Bektaş; Daniela Bezdan; Daniel J Butler; Sridar V Chittur; Martin Codyre; Fernan Federici; Nathan A Tanner; Scott W Tighe; Randy True; Sarah B Ware; Anne L Wyllie; Evan E Afshin; Andres Bendesky; Connie B Chang; Richard Dela Rosa; Eran Elhaik; David Erickson; Andrew S Goldsborough; George Grills; Kathrin Hadasch; Andrew Hayden; Seong-Young Her; Julie A Karl; Chang Hee Kim; Alison J Kriegel; Thomas Kunstman; Zeph Landau; Kevin Land; Bradley W Langhorst; Ariel B Lindner; Benjamin E Mayer; Lee A McLaughlin; Matthew T McLaughlin; Jenny Molloy; Christopher Mozsary; Jerry L Nadler; Melinee D'Silva; David Ng; David H O'Connor; Jerry E Ongerth; Olayinka Osuolale; Ana Pinharanda; Dennis Plenker; Ravi Ranjan; Michael Rosbash; Assaf Rotem; Jacob Segarra; Stephan Schürer; Scott Sherrill-Mix; Helena Solo-Gabriele; Shaina To; Merly C Vogt; Albert D Yu; Christopher E Mason Journal: J Biomol Tech Date: 2021-09
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Sarah Berhane; Melissa Taylor; Ada Adriano; Clare Davenport; Sabine Dittrich; Devy Emperador; Yemisi Takwoingi; Jane Cunningham; Sophie Beese; Julie Domen; Janine Dretzke; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Isobel M Harris; Malcolm J Price; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Lotty Hooft; Mariska Mg Leeflang; Matthew Df McInnes; René Spijker; Ann Van den Bruel Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-03-24
Authors: Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Ada Adriano; Sarah Berhane; Clare Davenport; Sabine Dittrich; Devy Emperador; Yemisi Takwoingi; Jane Cunningham; Sophie Beese; Janine Dretzke; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Isobel M Harris; Malcolm J Price; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Lotty Hooft; Mariska Mg Leeflang; René Spijker; Ann Van den Bruel Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-08-26
Authors: Marjon Zamani; James M Robson; Andy Fan; Michael S Bono; Ariel L Furst; Catherine M Klapperich Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 14.553