Literature DB >> 35522191

Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Archana Radhakrishnan1, Lauren P Wallner1,2, Ted A Skolarus3,4, Arvin K George3, Bradley H Rosenberg5, Paul Abrahamse6, Sarah T Hawley1,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Men on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer do not receive all the recommended testing. Reasons for variation in receipt are unknown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We combined prospective registry data from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative, a collaborative of 46 academic and community urology practices across Michigan, with insurance claims from 2014 to 2018 for men on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer. We defined receipt of recommended surveillance according to the collaborative's low-intensity criteria as: annual prostate specific antigen testing and either magnetic resonance imaging or prostate biopsy every 3 years. We assessed receipt of recommended surveillance among men with ≥36 months of followup (246). We conducted multilevel analyses to examine the influence of the urologist, urologist and primary care provider visits, and patient demographic and clinical factors on variation in receipt.
RESULTS: During 3 years of active surveillance, just over half of men (56.5%) received all recommended surveillance testing (69.9% annual prostate specific antigen testing, 72.8% magnetic resonance imaging/biopsy). We found 19% of the variation in receipt was attributed to individual urologists. While increasing provider visits were not significantly associated with receipt, older men were less likely to receive magnetic resonance imaging/biopsy (≥75 vs <55 years, adjusted odds ratio 0.07; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of men on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer did not receive all recommended surveillance. While urologists substantially influenced receipt of recommended testing, exploring how to leverage patients and their visits with their primary care providers to positively influence receipt appears warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; primary health care; prostate-specific antigen; urologists; watchful waiting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35522191      PMCID: PMC9378546          DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.600


  23 in total

1.  Physician variation in management of low-risk prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Karen E Hoffman; Jiangong Niu; Yu Shen; Jing Jiang; John W Davis; Jeri Kim; Deborah A Kuban; George H Perkins; Jay B Shah; Grace L Smith; Robert J Volk; Thomas A Buchholz; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Teams in Cancer Care Project.

Authors:  Michael P Kosty; Amy Hanley; Veronica Chollette; Suanna S Bruinooge; Steven H Taplin
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.

Authors:  Leonard P Bokhorst; Riccardo Valdagni; Antti Rannikko; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Tom Pickles; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Factors Influencing Men's Choice of and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Mixed-method Systematic Review.

Authors:  Netty Kinsella; Pär Stattin; Declan Cahill; Christian Brown; Anna Bill-Axelson; Ola Bratt; Sigrid Carlsson; Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan; J Athene Lane; Malcolm Mason; Chris Metcalfe; Peter Holding; Michael Davis; Tim J Peters; Emma L Turner; Richard M Martin; Jon Oxley; Mary Robinson; John Staffurth; Eleanor Walsh; Prasad Bollina; James Catto; Andrew Doble; Alan Doherty; David Gillatt; Roger Kockelbergh; Howard Kynaston; Alan Paul; Philip Powell; Stephen Prescott; Derek J Rosario; Edward Rowe; David E Neal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Mufaddal Mamawala; Jonathan I Epstein; Patricia Landis; Sacha Wolf; Bruce J Trock; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement.

Authors:  Ronald C Chen; R Bryan Rumble; D Andrew Loblaw; Antonio Finelli; Behfar Ehdaie; Matthew R Cooperberg; Scott C Morgan; Scott Tyldesley; John J Haluschak; Winston Tan; Stewart Justman; Suneil Jain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy: a new tool to inform recommendations for optimal screening strategies.

Authors:  Hyunsoon Cho; Carrie N Klabunde; K Robin Yabroff; Zhuoqiao Wang; Angela Meekins; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Angela B Mariotto
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Across US Census Regions.

Authors:  Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Neal Patel; Xiaoyue Ma; Adam Calaway; Lee Ponsky; Jim C Hu; Jonathan E Shoag
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Trends and practices for managing low-risk prostate cancer: a SEER-Medicare study.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Sarah L Mott; Bradley D McDowell; Sonia T Anand; Kenneth G Nepple
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.