Literature DB >> 24247672

Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy: a new tool to inform recommendations for optimal screening strategies.

Hyunsoon Cho, Carrie N Klabunde, K Robin Yabroff, Zhuoqiao Wang, Angela Meekins, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Angela B Mariotto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many guidelines recommend considering health status and life expectancy when making cancer screening decisions for elderly persons.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate life expectancy for elderly persons without a history of cancer, taking into account comorbid conditions.
DESIGN: Population-based cohort study.
SETTING: A 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries in selected geographic areas, including their claims and vital status information. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years or older between 1992 and 2005 without a history of cancer (n = 407 749). MEASUREMENTS: Medicare claims were used to identify comorbid conditions included in the Charlson index. Survival probabilities were estimated by comorbidity group (no, low/medium, and high) and for the 3 most prevalent conditions (diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure) by using the Cox proportional hazards model. Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy was calculated based on comparisons of survival models with U.S. life tables. Survival probabilities from the U.S. life tables providing the most similar survival experience to the cohort of interest were used.
RESULTS: Persons with higher levels of comorbidity had shorter life expectancies, whereas those with no comorbid conditions, including very elderly persons, had favorable life expectancies relative to an average person of the same chronological age. The estimated life expectancy at age 75 years was approximately 3 years longer for persons with no comorbid conditions and approximately 3 years shorter for those with high comorbidity relative to the average U.S. population. LIMITATIONS: The cohort was limited to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 66 years or older living in selected geographic areas. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry and Medicare claims lack information on functional status and severity of comorbidity, which might influence life expectancy in elderly persons.
CONCLUSION: Life expectancy varies considerably by comorbidity status in elderly persons. Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy may help physicians tailor recommendations for stopping or continuing cancer screening for individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24247672     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-10-201311190-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  69 in total

1.  Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Natasha K Stout; Clyde B Schechter; Jeroen J van den Broek; Diana L Miglioretti; Martin Krapcho; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Diego Munoz; Sandra J Lee; Donald A Berry; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Oguzhan Alagoz; Karla Kerlikowske; Anna N A Tosteson; Aimee M Near; Amanda Hoeffken; Yaojen Chang; Eveline A Heijnsdijk; Gary Chisholm; Xuelin Huang; Hui Huang; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Ronald Gangnon; Brian L Sprague; Sylvia Plevritis; Eric Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Frailty Assessment Predicts Acute Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sasha Taleban; Nima Toosizadeh; Shilpa Junna; Todd Golden; Sehem Ghazala; Rita Wadeea; Coco Tirambulo; Jane Mohler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Personalizing age of cancer screening cessation based on comorbid conditions: model estimates of harms and benefits.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Roman Gulati; Angela B Mariotto; Clyde B Schechter; Tiago M de Carvalho; Amy B Knudsen; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Chester Pabiniak; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Carolyn M Rutter; Karen M Kuntz; Eric J Feuer; Ruth Etzioni; Harry J de Koning; Ann G Zauber; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  A systematic literature review of life expectancy prediction tools for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew Kent; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Primary prevention: do the very elderly require a different approach?

Authors:  Janice B Schwartz
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 6.677

6.  Preventive care service use among cancer survivors with serious psychological distress: An analysis of the medical expenditure panel survey data.

Authors:  Sun Hee Rim; K Robin Yabroff; Sabitha Dasari; Xuesong Han; Kristin Litzelman; Donatus U Ekwueme
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Personalized Risks of Over Diagnosis for Screen Detected Prostate Cancer Incorporating Patient Comorbidities: Estimation and Communication.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Sarah P Psutka; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Personalizing colonoscopy screening for elderly individuals based on screening history, cancer risk, and comorbidity status could increase cost effectiveness.

Authors:  Frank van Hees; Sameer D Saini; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Sandeep Vijan; Reinier G S Meester; Harry J de Koning; Ann G Zauber; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Influence of Age and Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Yingye Zheng; Virginia P Quinn; Elisabeth F Beaber; Carolyn M Rutter; Ethan A Halm; Jessica Chubak; Chyke A Doubeni; Jennifer S Haas; Aruna Kamineni; Marilyn M Schapira; Pamela M Vacek; Michael P Garcia; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Comparing Prognostic Tools for Cancer Screening: Considerations for Clinical Practice and Performance Assessment.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Amanda L Blackford; Nancy L Schoenborn; Cynthia M Boyd; Kimberly S Peairs; Eva H DuGoff
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.