Literature DB >> 34108645

Trends and practices for managing low-risk prostate cancer: a SEER-Medicare study.

Richard M Hoffman1,2,3, Sarah L Mott4,5, Bradley D McDowell4,5, Sonia T Anand5, Kenneth G Nepple4,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Expectant management (EM) has been widely recommended for men with low-risk prostate cancers (PCa). We evaluated trends in EM and the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with EM, initiating a National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-concordant active surveillance (AS) monitoring protocol, and switching from EM to active treatment (AT).
METHODS: We used the SEER-Medicare database to identify men ages 66+ diagnosed with a low-risk PCa (PSA < 10 ng/mL, Gleason ≤ 6, stage ≤ T2a) in 2010-2013 with ≥1 year of follow-up. We used claims data to capture (1) PCa treatments, including surgical procedures, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy, and (2) AS monitoring procedures, including PSA tests and prostate biopsy. We defined EM as receiving no AT within 1 year of diagnosis. We used multivariable regression techniques to identify factors associated with EM, initiating AS monitoring, and switching to AT.
RESULTS: During the study period, EM increased from 29.4% to 49.0%, p < 0.01. Age < 77, being married/partnered, non-Hispanic ethnicity, higher median ZIP code income, lower PSA levels, stage T1c, and more recent year of diagnosis were associated with EM. Nearly 39% of the EM cohort initiated AS monitoring; age <77, White race, being married/partnered, higher median ZIP code income, and lower PSA levels were associated with initiating AS. By three years after diagnosis, 21.3% of the EM cohort had switched to AT, usually after undergoing AS monitoring procedures. DISCUSSION: We found increasing uptake of EM over time, though over 50% still received AT. About 60% of EM patients did not initiate AS monitoring, even among those with life expectancy >10 years, implying that a substantial proportion was being managed by watchful waiting. AS monitoring was associated with switching to AT, suggesting that treatment decisions likely were based on cancer progression.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34108645      PMCID: PMC8976291          DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00393-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.455


  39 in total

1.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The 2010 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology on prostate cancer.

Authors:  James L Mohler
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in Black Patients.

Authors:  Santino Butler; Vinayak Muralidhar; Janice Chavez; Zoe Fullerton; Aman Mahal; Michelle Nezolosky; Marie Vastola; Shuang G Zhao; Anthony V D'Amico; Robert T Dess; Felix Y Feng; Martin T King; Kent W Mouw; Daniel E Spratt; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy R Rebbeck; Brandon A Mahal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Selecting Active Surveillance: Decision Making Factors for Men with a Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Tania Lobo; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Amethyst D Leimpeter; David Aaronson; David F Penson; Kathryn Taylor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Alex Mueller; Ryan K Berglund; Raj Ayyathurai; Cindy Soloway; Mark S Soloway; Robert Abouassaly; Eric A Klein; Steven J Jones; Chris Zappavigna; Larry Goldenberg; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Variation in Locoregional Prostate Cancer Care and Treatment Trends at Commission on Cancer Designated Facilities: A National Cancer Data Base Analysis 2004 to 2013.

Authors:  Björn Löppenberg; Akshay Sood; Deepansh Dalela; Patrick Karabon; Jesse D Sammon; Malte W Vetterlein; Joachim Noldus; James O Peabody; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Mani Menon; Firas Abdollah
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study.

Authors:  Meelan Bul; Xiaoye Zhu; Riccardo Valdagni; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Antti Rannikko; Anders Bjartell; Deric K van der Schoot; Erik B Cornel; Giario N Conti; Egbert R Boevé; Frédéric Staerman; Jenneke J Vis-Maters; Henk Vergunst; Joris J Jaspars; Petra Strölin; Erik van Muilekom; Fritz H Schröder; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.

Authors:  Gerrit Draisma; Ruth Etzioni; Alex Tsodikov; Angela Mariotto; Elisabeth Wever; Roman Gulati; Eric Feuer; Harry de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part II: Recommended Approaches and Details of Specific Care Options.

Authors:  Martin G Sanda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Erin Kirkby; Ronald C Chen; Tony Crispino; Joann Fontanarosa; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Greene; Laurence H Klotz; Danil V Makarov; Joel B Nelson; George Rodrigues; Howard M Sandler; Mary Ellen Taplin; Jonathan R Treadwell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Grade Migration of Prostate Cancer in the United States During the Last Decade.

Authors:  Leonardo D Borregales; Gina DeMeo; Xiangmei Gu; Emily Cheng; Vanessa Dudley; Edward M Schaeffer; Himanshu Nagar; Sigrid Carlsson; Andrew Vickers; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.816

2.  Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Archana Radhakrishnan; Lauren P Wallner; Ted A Skolarus; Arvin K George; Bradley H Rosenberg; Paul Abrahamse; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 7.600

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.