| Literature DB >> 35520634 |
Varun Pratap Singh1,2, Anup Singh Pathania3, Manoj Kushwaha4, Samsher Singh5, Vandana Sharma4,6, Fayaz A Malik3, Inshad A Khan5,7, Anil Kumar2, Deepika Singh1,4, Ram A Vishwakarma1.
Abstract
Velutibol A (1), a new 14-residue peptaibol was isolated from the Himalayan cold habitat fungus Trichoderma velutinum. The structural characterization was carried out by 1D and 2D NMR studies, and tandem mass studies, and Marfey's method aided in determining the stereochemistry of the amino acids. The CD analysis revealed folding of the peptide in a 310-helical conformation. The intramolecular H-bonding was determined by an NMR-VT experiment. Cytotoxic evaluation was carried out against a panel of cancer cell lines. The cell cycle assay was carried out on human myeloid leukaemia (HL-60) cells and revealed the formation of apoptotic bodies and DNA damage in a dose-dependent manner. Three other peptaibols namely velutibol B (2), velutibol C (3), and velutibol D (4) were also isolated in trace amounts from the psychotropic fungus and characterized through tandem mass spectroscopy and Marfey's analysis. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35520634 PMCID: PMC9056410 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra05780k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1(a) Structure of velutibol A (1); (b) plausible sequence of velutibol B–D (2–4).
Proton and carbon NMR value of 1 in DMSO-d6
| Residue | Type |
13C ( |
1H ( | Residue | Type |
13C ( |
1H ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ac | 1 | C | 171.2 | — | 5 | CH3 | 21.5 | 0.79 (m) | |
| 2 | CH3 | 22.9 | 1.90, (s) | 6 | CH3 | 22.8 | 0.85 (d, 6.8) | ||
| Aib-1 | 1 | C | 176.3 | — | NH | 7.21 (d, 8.4) | |||
| 2 | C | 55.9 | — | Aib-8 | 1 | C | 172.1 | ||
| 3 | CH3 | 23.6 | 1.34 (s) | 2 | C | 55.6 | |||
| 4 | CH3 | 26.5 | 1.36 (s) | 3 | CH3 | 23.7 | 1.40 (s) | ||
| NH | 8.73 (s) | 4 | CH3 | 25.6 | 1.29 (s) | ||||
| Gln-2 | 1 | C | 172.6 | NH | 7.63 (s) | ||||
| 2 | CH | 55.0 | 3.96 (m) | Pro-9 | 1 | C | 172.9 | ||
| 3 | CH2 | 25.0 | 1.97 (m) | 2 | CH | 63.2 | 4.13 (t, 8.4) | ||
| 4 | CH2 | 31.1 | 2.29 (m), 2.18 (m) | 3 | CH2 | 28.5 | 2.20(m), 1.61 (m) | ||
| 5 | C | 174.5 | 4 | CH2 | 25.1 | 1.86 (m), 1.74(m) | |||
| NH2 | 7.48 (br s), 6.95 (br s) | 5 | CH2 | 48.1 | 3.68(m), 3.58 (m) | ||||
| NH | 8.93 (d, 5.2) | Aib-10 | 1 | C | 173.6 | ||||
| Leu-3 | 1 | C | 171.7 | 2 | C | 56.1 | |||
| 2 | CH | 51.2 | 4.18 (m) | 3 | CH3 | 25.6 | 1.36 (s) | ||
| 3 | CH2 | 39.1 | 1.78 (m), 1.47 (m) | 4 | CH3 | 23.6 | 1.36 (s) | ||
| 4 | CH | 24.2 | 1.57 (m) | NH | 7.84 (s) | ||||
| 5 | CH3 | 22.8 | 0.89 (d, 6.8) | Aib-11 | 1 | C | 175.5 | ||
| 6 | CH3 | 20.7 | 0.79 (m) | 2 | C | 56.0 | |||
| NH | 7.88 (d, 8.4) | 3 | CH3 | 26.5 | 1.36 (s) | ||||
| Aib-4 | 1 | C | 173.6 | 4 | CH3 | 23.6 | 1.44 (s) | ||
| 2 | C | 55.8 | NH | 7.34 (s) | |||||
| 3 | CH3 | 23.4 | 1.49 (s) | Aib-12 | 1 | C | 171.6 | ||
| 4 | CH3 | 25.4 | 1.36 (s) | 2 | C | 55.7 | |||
| NH | 7.93 (s) | 3 | CH3 | 23.7 | 1.39 (s) | ||||
| Pro-5 | 1 | C | 172.7 | 4 | CH3 | 25.0 | 1.36 (s) | ||
| 2 | CH | 63.1 | 4.23 (m) | NH | 7.58 (s) | ||||
| 3 | CH2 | 28.7 | 2.18 (m), 2.08 (m) | Pro-13 | 1 | C | 170.9 | ||
| 4 | CH2 | 25.4 | 1.86 (m), 1.74 (m) | 2 | CH | 61.9 | 4.23 (m) | ||
| 5 | CH2 | 48.4 | 3.68 (m), 3.58 (m) | 3 | CH2 | 28.1 | 2.18(m), 2.08 (m) | ||
| Val-6 | 1 | C | 171.4 | 4 | CH2 | 25.6 | 1.86(m), 1.74 (m) | ||
| 2 | CH | 60.1 | 3.85 (t, 8.0) | 5 | CH2 | 48.4 | 3.68(m), 3.58 (m) | ||
| 3 | CH | 28.8 | 2.18 (m) | Leuol | 1 | CH | 48.4 | 3.77 (m) | |
| 4 | CH3 | 19.0 | 0.97 (d, 6.4) | 2 | CH2 | 39.3 | 1.37 (m) | ||
| 5 | CH3 | 18.9 | 0.91 (d, 6.8) | 3 | CH | 23.8 | 1.67 (m) | ||
| NH | 7.28 (d, 8.4) | 4 | CH3 | 22.8 | 0.82 (m) | ||||
| Leu-7 | 1 | C | 172.2 | 5 | CH3 | 20.2 | 0.79 (m) | ||
| 2 | CH | 51.2 | 4.29 (m) | 6 |
| 63.9 | 3.27(m), 3.18 (m) | ||
| 3 | CH2 | 39.6 | 1.54 (m) | NH | 7.15 (d, 9.6) | ||||
| 4 | CH | 24.4 | 1.67 (m) | OH | 4.23 (m) |
From DEPT-135.
Signal overlap.
Fig. 2The key correlation from 2D NMR (COSY, TOCSY, NOESY and HMBC) of compound 1.
Fig. 3MS studies of compound 1 (a) MS2 at m/z 1414.9059 [M + H]+; (b) MS3 for daughter ion b12 at m/z 1200.7371 (c) MS3 for daughter ion b8 at m/z 848.526.
Plausible sequence of 2–4 with their respective daughter ions from MS/MS studies
| Compounds | Sequence |
|
| Respective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Velutibol B (2) | Ac-Aib-Gln-Lxx-Aib-Pro-Vxx-Lxx-Aib-Pro-Aib-Aib-Aib-Pro-Lxxol | 1414.9060, 1436.8882 | 43.5 | 1200.73, 1115.67, 1030.63, 945.57, 848.52, 763.47, 650.38, 551.31, 454.27, 369.21, 256.13 and 128.07 |
| Velutibol C (3) | Ac-Aib-Gln-Lxx-Aib-Pro-Vxx-Lxx-Aib-Pro-Aib-Aib-Aib-Pro-Lxxol | 1414.9022, 1436.8835 | 44.3 | 1200.74, 1115.68, 1030.62, 848.52, 763.47, 650.38, 551.31, 454.27, 369.21, 256.13 and 128.07 |
| Velutibol D (4) | Ac-Vxx-Gln-Lxx-Aib-Pro-Vxx-Lxx-Aib-Pro-Aib-Aib-Aib-Pro-Lxxol | 1428.9188, 1450.9013 | 45.0 | 1214.75, 1129.71, 1044.65, 959.60, 862.54, 777.49, 644.40, 565.34, 468.28, 383.23, 270.14 and 142.09 |
HRMS observed values for [M + H]+ and [M + Na]+, tR = retention time.
Fig. 4CD spectrum of compound 1 in methanol.
Fig. 5NMR-VT experiment performed for compound 1 at four different temperatures i.e. 298 K, 308 K, 318 K and 328 K.
Cytotoxic assay of 1 against various cell lines
| IC50 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A549 | LS-180 | HL-60 | MDA-MB-231 | |
| 1 | 23 ± 0.8 | 26 ± 1.1 | 4 ± 0.1 | 7 ± 0.2 |
| Paclitaxel (nM) | 6.2 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.1 |
IC50 = half maximal inhibitory concentration. The experiments were conducted three times and data represented as mean ± standard deviation, with p value less than 0.05 calculated using Student t-test.
Fig. 6Effect of 1 (a) on cell cycle phase distribution; (b) on the morphology and (c) on the nuclear morphology of HL-60 cells.
Fig. 7Graphical representation of cells undergoing apoptosis after treatment with compound 1. Columns, mean; bars, SD with ***p < 0.001 versus control.