Ramesh L Walpola1, Romano A Fois1, Andrew J McLachlan1,2, Timothy F Chen1. 1. Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
Background: Despite peer-led teaching demonstrating benefits in patient safety education, few studies have evaluated these programmes from the perspective of peer leaders. Objective: To evaluate the impact of peer leader participation in a patient safety education workshop in improving their patient safety attitudes. Participants: 34 final year pharmacy student peer leaders. Methods: An interactive peer-led patient safety workshop was delivered to 249 first year pharmacy students. Peer leaders' attitudes were assessed 2 months prior to and immediately after peer leader training; and immediately after and 1 month following the workshop. Using a validated patient safety attitudinal survey, repeated measures analysis of variance and pairwise comparisons were used to evaluate changes in four key attitudes over time: being quality improvement focused; internalising errors; questioning more senior healthcare professionals' behaviours; and attitudes towards the open disclosure of errors. Results: Compared to baseline, peer leaders' attitudes towards open disclosure significantly improved immediately following the workshop (p=0.010) and were sustained after 1 month (p=0.028). Attitudes towards being quality improvement focused also improved significantly 1 month after the workshop (p=0.003). Conclusions: Participation in a peer-led patient safety education programme benefits both students and peer leaders, enabling further mastery of concepts and enhancing generational change in patient safety practices. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Background: Despite peer-led teaching demonstrating benefits in patient safety education, few studies have evaluated these programmes from the perspective of peer leaders. Objective: To evaluate the impact of peer leader participation in a patient safety education workshop in improving their patient safety attitudes. Participants: 34 final year pharmacy student peer leaders. Methods: An interactive peer-led patient safety workshop was delivered to 249 first year pharmacy students. Peer leaders' attitudes were assessed 2 months prior to and immediately after peer leader training; and immediately after and 1 month following the workshop. Using a validated patient safety attitudinal survey, repeated measures analysis of variance and pairwise comparisons were used to evaluate changes in four key attitudes over time: being quality improvement focused; internalising errors; questioning more senior healthcare professionals' behaviours; and attitudes towards the open disclosure of errors. Results: Compared to baseline, peer leaders' attitudes towards open disclosure significantly improved immediately following the workshop (p=0.010) and were sustained after 1 month (p=0.028). Attitudes towards being quality improvement focused also improved significantly 1 month after the workshop (p=0.003). Conclusions: Participation in a peer-led patient safety education programme benefits both students and peer leaders, enabling further mastery of concepts and enhancing generational change in patient safety practices. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
Patient safety; pharmacy; professional education; undergraduate education
Authors: Andrew A White; Thomas H Gallagher; Melissa J Krauss; Jane Garbutt; Amy D Waterman; W Claiborne Dunagan; Victoria J Fraser; Wendy Levinson; Eric B Larson Journal: Acad Med Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Maria Ahmed; Sonal Arora; Paul Baker; Jacky Hayden; Charles Vincent; Nick Sevdalis Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Claire L Teigland; Rachel C Blasiak; Lindsay A Wilson; Rachel E Hines; Karen L Meyerhoff; Anthony J Viera Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 2.463