PURPOSE: To measure trainees' attitudes and experiences regarding medical error and error disclosure. METHOD: In 2003, the authors carried out a cross-sectional survey of 629 medical students (320 in their second year, 309 in their fourth year), 226 interns (159 in medicine, 67 in surgery), and 283 residents (211 in medicine, 72 in surgery), a total 1,138 trainees at two U.S. academic health centers. RESULTS: The response rate was 78% (889/1,138). Most trainees (74%; 652/881) agreed that medical error is among the most serious health care problems. Nearly all (99%; 875/884) agreed serious errors should be disclosed to patients, but 87% (774/889) acknowledged at least one possible barrier, including thinking that the patient would not understand the disclosure (59%; 525/889), the patient would not want to know about the error (42%; 376/889), and the patient might sue (33%; 297/889). Personal involvement with medical errors was common among the fourth-year students (78%; 164/209) and the residents (98%; 182/185). Among residents, 45% (83/185) reported involvement in a serious error, 34% (62/183) reported experience disclosing a serious error, and 63% (115/183) had disclosed a minor error. Whereas only 33% (289/880) of trainees had received training in error disclosure, 92% (808/881) expressed interest in such training, particularly at the time of disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: Although many trainees had disclosed errors to patients, only a minority had been formally prepared to do so. Formal disclosure curricula, coupled with supervised practice, are necessary to prepare trainees to independently disclose errors to patients by the end of their training.
PURPOSE: To measure trainees' attitudes and experiences regarding medical error and error disclosure. METHOD: In 2003, the authors carried out a cross-sectional survey of 629 medical students (320 in their second year, 309 in their fourth year), 226 interns (159 in medicine, 67 in surgery), and 283 residents (211 in medicine, 72 in surgery), a total 1,138 trainees at two U.S. academic health centers. RESULTS: The response rate was 78% (889/1,138). Most trainees (74%; 652/881) agreed that medical error is among the most serious health care problems. Nearly all (99%; 875/884) agreed serious errors should be disclosed to patients, but 87% (774/889) acknowledged at least one possible barrier, including thinking that the patient would not understand the disclosure (59%; 525/889), the patient would not want to know about the error (42%; 376/889), and the patient might sue (33%; 297/889). Personal involvement with medical errors was common among the fourth-year students (78%; 164/209) and the residents (98%; 182/185). Among residents, 45% (83/185) reported involvement in a serious error, 34% (62/183) reported experience disclosing a serious error, and 63% (115/183) had disclosed a minor error. Whereas only 33% (289/880) of trainees had received training in error disclosure, 92% (808/881) expressed interest in such training, particularly at the time of disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: Although many trainees had disclosed errors to patients, only a minority had been formally prepared to do so. Formal disclosure curricula, coupled with supervised practice, are necessary to prepare trainees to independently disclose errors to patients by the end of their training.
Authors: Barbara G Jericho; Rosalie F Tassone; Nikki M Centomani; Jennifer Clary; Crescent Turner; Michael Sikora; David Mayer; Timothy McDonald Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2010-06
Authors: Andrew A White; Sigall K Bell; Melissa J Krauss; Jane Garbutt; W Claiborne Dunagan; Victoria J Fraser; Wendy Levinson; Eric B Larson; Thomas H Gallagher Journal: Med Educ Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Thomas H Gallagher; Andrea J Cook; R James Brenner; Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy L Onega; Robert D Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Constance D Lehman; Joann G Elmore Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Delphine S Courvoisier; Thomas Agoritsas; Thomas V Perneger; Ralph E Schmidt; Stéphane Cullati Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 3.240