| Literature DB >> 35513482 |
Chiao-Lin Hsu1,2, Wei-Lun Huang3, Hung-Hui Chen4,5, Jerry Cheng-Yen Lai6,7.
Abstract
Few studies compared the effects of non-fermented and fermented tea among the general population. We aimed to compare the risk of incident osteoporosis (OP) between non-fermented tea and fermented tea drinkers by this retrospective nationwide population-based analysis from the Taiwan Biobank. Participants ≥ 40 years who drink fermented tea (n = 2205) were compared with those who drink non-fermented tea (n = 1034) from 2008 to 2015 with a mean follow-up period of 3.64 years. OP was defined by T-score ≤ - 2.5. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to estimate the risk of developing OP between the two groups. Separate models were used to determine the relationship between tea consumption and OP stratified by sex and age. There was a significant interaction between sex, age, and type of tea consumed. In men aged ≥ 60 years, the risk of developing OP decreased by 79% for those who drank non-fermented tea (hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence level, 0.05-0.94) than those who drank fermented tea. Additionally, those with a family history of OP had a higher risk of developing osteoporosis. This study suggests that male elderly who consume non-fermented tea have a lower risk of OP. Drinking non-fermented tea, such as green tea, could be suggested, especially for those with a family history of osteoporosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35513482 PMCID: PMC9072314 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11066-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1A flowchart demonstrating the enrollment of the study cohort. A total of 3239 participants had tea drinking habits, among whom 2205 (68.1%) participants had a fermented tea drinking habits and 1034 (31.9%) participants had non-fermented tea drinking habits.
Characteristics of the drink fermented tea and non-fermented tea groups (N = 3239).
| Total (N = 3239) | Drink fermented tea group (n = 2205; 68.1%) | Drink non-fermented tea group (n = 1034; 31.9%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up years (95% CI) | 3.64 (3.60–3.68) | 3.64 (3.59–3.69) | 3.64 (3.56–3.71) | 0.919 |
CI, confidence interval; mon, month; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; BMD, bone mineral density.
p < 0.05*; p < 0.01**; p < 0.001***.
aResidential urbanicity stratification was classified into urban, suburban, and rural according to the population density, ratio of educated people, age (aged ≥ 65 years), farmers, and the number of physicians per 100,000 people as defined by Liu et al.[27].
bTotal tea drinking amount was divided by cups (200 ml).
cUnadjusted p-value (Chi-square test or Student’s t-test).
Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model for osteoporosis.
| Variables | Adjusted HR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex: Female (vs Male) | 1.50 (1.00–2.27) | 0.051 |
| Age: ≥ 60 y (vs 40 ~ < 60 y) | 2.57 (1.85–3.58) | < 0.001*** |
| Educational level (vs College or graduate school) | ||
| High school | 1.54 (1.11–2.14) | 0.010 ** |
| None or elementary school | 1.36 (0.79–2.34) | 0.262 |
| Residential urbanicity (vs Urban) | ||
| Suburban | 0.79 (0.57–1.09) | 0.147 |
| Rural | 0.69 (0.38–1.26) | 0.225 |
| Baseline comorbidity | ||
| Family history of osteoporosis: Yes (vs No) | 1.31 (0.87–1.96) | 0.192 |
| Diabetes mellitus: Yes (vs No) | 1.35 (0.83–2.19) | 0.229 |
| Coronary heart disease: Yes (vs No) | 0.86 (0.35–2.13) | 0.742 |
| Body Composition profile | ||
| Waist circumference | 1.02 (0.99–1.05) | 0.304 |
| Hip circumference | 1.03 (0.98–1.07) | 0.216 |
| BMI | 0.88 (0.80–0.96) | 0.006** |
| Behavioral factors | ||
| Tea drinking: Non-fermented tea (vs Fermented tea) | 1.22 (0.89–1.66) | 0.213 |
| Total tea drinking amounta (vs 1–3 cup/day) | ||
| 4–6 cups/day | 1.22 (0.86–1.74) | 0.269 |
| > 6 cups/day | 1.20 (0.78–1.85) | 0.417 |
| Coffee drinking habits: Drink coffee (vs No) | 1.11 (0.82–1.51) | 0.482 |
| Regular diet: > 3 meals per day (vs 1–3 meals/day) | 1.15 (0.28–4.69) | 0.850 |
| Regular exercise: Yes (vs No) | 0.74 (0.54–1.01) | 0.056 |
| Smoking experience: Yes (vs No) | 1.03 (0.68–1.56) | 0.883 |
| Weekday Sleeping Time: After midnight (vs Before midnight) | 0.81 (0.32–2.05) | 0.657 |
| Weekend Sleeping Time: After midnight (vs Before midnight) | 0.84 (0.34–2.07) | 0.700 |
| Educational level (vs College or graduate school) | ||
| High school | 1.54 (1.11–2.14) | 0.010* |
| None or elementary school | 1.37 (0.80–2.35) | 0.259 |
| BMI | 0.88 (0.80–0.96) | 0.006** |
| Sex and tea drinking | ||
| Male, drink fermented tea (n = 1181) | 1 | |
| Male, drink non-fermented tea (n = 405) | 1.08 (0.64–1.83) | 0.775 |
| Female, drink fermented tea (n = 1024) | 1.42 (0.89–2.25) | 0.139 |
| Female, drink non-fermented tea (n = 629) | 1.84 (1.13–3.00) | 0.014* |
| Educational level (vs College or graduate school) | ||
| High school | 1.55 (1.11–2.15) | 0.010** |
| None or elementary school | 1.34 (0.78–2.31) | 0.285 |
| BMI | 0.88 (0.80–0.97) | 0.008** |
| Age and tea drinking | ||
| 40 ~ < 60 Y, drink fermented tea (n = 1565) | 1 | |
| 40 ~ < 60 Y, drink non-fermented tea (n = 791) | 1.52 (1.02–2.26) | 0.041* |
| ≥ 60 Y, drink fermented tea (n = 640) | 3.14 (2.10–4.69) | < 0.001*** |
| ≥ 60 Y, drink non-fermented tea (n = 243) | 2.77 (1.66–4.60) | < 0.001*** |
| Educational level (vs College or graduate school) | ||
| High school | 1.51 (1.09–2.10) | 0.014* |
| None or elementary school | 1.30 (0.76–2.25) | 0.339 |
| BMI | 0.88 (0.80–0.97) | 0.008** |
| Regular exercise: Yes (vs No) | 0.73 (0.53–0.99) | 0.044* |
| Sex, age and tea drinking | ||
| Male, 40 ~ < 60 Y, drink fermented tea (n = 785) | 0.22 (0.11–0.42) | < 0.001*** |
| Male, 40 ~ < 60 Y, drink non-fermented tea (n = 294) | 0.35 (0.17–0.74) | 0.005** |
| Male, ≥ 60 Y, drink fermented tea (n = 396) | 0.45 (0.23–0.87) | 0.017* |
| Male, ≥ 60 Y, drink non-fermented tea (n = 111) | 0.12 (0.03–0.53) | 0.005** |
| Female, 40 ~ < 60 Y, drink fermented tea (n = 780) | 0.21 (0.11–0.37) | < 0.001*** |
| Female, 40 ~ < 60 Y, drink non-fermented tea (n = 497) | 0.33 (0.18–0.60) | < 0.001*** |
| Female, ≥ 60 Y, drink fermented tea (n = 244) | 0.96 (0.54–1.69) | 0.885 |
| Female, ≥ 60 Y, drink non-fermented tea (n = 132) | 1 | |
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; BMI, body mass index.
p < 0.05*; p < 0.01**; p < 0.001***.
aTotal tea drinking amount was divided by cups (200 ml).
bHazard ratio without adjusting confounding factors.
cHazard ratio adjusted for age, residential urbanicity, family history of osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, waist circumference, hip circumference, total tea drinking amount, coffee drinking habits, regular diet > 3 meals per day, regular exercise, smoking experience, weekday sleeping time, and weekend sleeping time.
dHazard ratio adjusted for sex and all variables in footnote c, except for age.
eHazard ratio adjusted for all variables in footnote c, except for age and sex.
Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model for osteoporosis by sex and age.
| Variables | Men | Women | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥ 40 Y | 40 ~ < 60 Y | ≥ 60 Y | ≥ 40 Y | 40 ~ < 60 Y | ≥ 60 Y | |
| HR (95% CI)b | HR (95% CI)c | HR (95% CI)b | HR (95% CI)b | HR (95% CI)d | HR (95% CI)c | |
| 40 ~ < 60 y | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - |
| > = 60 y | 1.48 (0.86–2.52) | - | - | 3.11 (2.04–4.76)*** | - | - |
| Pre-menopausal | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - |
| Post-menopausal | - | - | - | 3.21 (1.43–7.19)** | 3.13 (1.37–7.14)** | - |
| No | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 2.00 (1.11–3.59)* | 1.46 (0.66–3.22) | 5.22 (2.00–13.66)*** | 1.04 (0.59–1.86) | 1.72 (0.85–3.51) | 0.51 (0.18–1.48) |
| BMI | 0.87 (0.74–1.03) | 0.79 (0.64–0.98)* | 1.09 (0.84–1.43) | 0.88 (0.78–0.99)* | 0.88 (0.74–1.04) | 0.87 (0.74–1.03) |
| Fermented tea | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Non-fermented tea | 1.02 (0.60–1.73) | 1.42 (0.76–2.66) | 0.21 (0.05–0.94)* | 1.30 (0.88–1.92) | 1.58 (0.92–2.73) | 1.07 (0.59–1.95) |
| 1–3 cup/day | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 4–6 cups/day | 1.33 (0.77–2.29) | 1.81 (0.93–3.52) | 0.53 (0.18–1.55) | 1.14 (0.71–1.84) | 1.21 (0.60–2.43) | 1.17 (0.60–2.29) |
| > 6 cups/day | 0.83 (0.42–1.66) | 0.76 (0.30–1.92) | 0.73 (0.25–2.14) | 1.83 (1.04–3.20)* | 2.49 (1.19–5.23)* | 1.39 (0.56–3.49) |
Y, years old; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OP, osteoporosis; BMI, body mass index.
p < 0.05*; p < 0.01**; p < 0.001***.
aTotal tea drinking amount was divided by cups (200 ml).
bHazard ratio adjusted for educational level, residential urbanicity, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, waist circumference, hip circumference, coffee drinking habits, regular diet > 3 meals per day, regular exercise, smoking experience, weekday sleeping time, and weekend sleeping time.
cHazard ratio adjusted for all variables in footnote b, except for the regular diet variable.
dHazard ratio adjusted for all variables in footnote b, except for the status of coronary heart disease.
Figure 2The cumulative incidences of osteoporosis in men (a younger than 60 years; b older than 60 years) and women (c younger than 60 years; d older than 60 years) who drank non-fermented tea and fermented tea were performed by the Kaplan–Meier product-limit method. Protective effect against osteoporosis were seen only in non-fermented tea drinkers who were male and aged 60 years or more, and the difference between these two groups was compared with log-rank test (p < 0.05).