| Literature DB >> 27182250 |
Chenshu Huang1, Rongrui Tang2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between tea drinking habits and osteoporotic hip/femur fractures.Entities:
Keywords: Case-control study; Fracture; Hip; Osteoporosis; Tea
Year: 2016 PMID: 27182250 PMCID: PMC4859033 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.322.9092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 1.088
General Condition
| Variable | The Controls Group (n=435) | The Cases Group (n=435) |
|---|---|---|
| Male / Female | 322/113 | 322/113 |
| Age (Mean±sd) | 71.31±6.96 | 71.93±7.23 |
| Body mass index (Mean±sd, kg/m2) | 22.52±3.74 | 21.26±3.54 |
| Tea drinking habits Yes | 191 (44.0%) | 149 (34.3%) |
| No | 244 (56.1%) | 286 (65.7%) |
| Cumulative year of tea drinking (Mean±sd) | 11.28±14.92 | 9.15±13.83 |
| Average time per week (Mean±sd) | 2.20±2.89 | 1.67±2.67 |
| Average amount of tea drinking per year (Mean±sd, kg) | 0.67±1.35 | 0.50±0.88 |
| Cumulative amount of tea (Mean±sd, kg) | 12.82±28.34 | 15.64±38.36 |
| Tea concentration No | 233 (56.0%) | 272 (65.4%) |
| Low dose | 75 (18.0%) | 50 (12.0%) |
| Medium and High dose | 108 (26.0%) | 94 (22.6%) |
Data out of the parentheses is the number of cases, while data in the parentheses is the proportion (%)
Relationship between Tea drinking and osteoporotic Hip/femur Fractures.
| Variable | Number of Cases/controls | Single factor analysis | Multiple factors analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | p-Value | OR (95%CI) | p-Value | ||
| Tea drinking habits | |||||
| Tea drinking habits No | 286/244 | 1.00 | 0.001 | 1.00 | 0.021 |
| Yes | 149/191 | 0.66(0.52~0.84) | 0.72(0.54 ~ 0.95) | ||
| Cumulative year of tea drinking | 0.002 | 0.034 | |||
| No | 286/244 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| ≤20y | 75/95 | 0.68(0.48 ~ 0.91) | 0.71(0.50 ~ 0.96) | ||
| >20y | 74/96 | 0.69(0.48 ~0.90) | 0.73(0.52 ~ 1.08) | ||
| The average weekly frequency | 0.001 | 0.034 | |||
| 0 | 286/244 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| 1-6 | 74/97 | 0.66(0.51 ~ 0.91) | 0.72(0.45 ~ 0.98) | ||
| ≥7 | 75/94 | 0.65(0.46 ~ 0.91) | 0.72(0.49 ~ 1.08) | ||
| The average weekly frequency | 0.002 | 0.031 | |||
| No | 286/244 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| ≤median | 98/113 | 0.75(0.56 ~ 0.98) | 0.84(0.61 ~ 1.16) | ||
| >median | 51/78 | 0.54(0.38 ~ 0.77) | 0.54(0.36 ~ 0.83) | ||
| Cumulative amount of tea | 0.004 | 0.062 | |||
| No | 286/244 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| ≤median | 78/100 | 0.65(0.48 ~ 0.89) | 0.71(0.48 ~ 0.96) | ||
| >median | 71/91 | 0.66(0.48 ~ 0.92) | 0.75(0.55 ~ 1.09) | ||
| Tea concentration | 0.005 | 0.043 | |||
| No | 286/244 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Low dose | 52/77 | 0.56(0.40 ~ 0.78) | 0.62(0.42 ~ 0.95) | ||
| Medium and High dose | 97/114 | 0.72(0.54 ~ 0.95) | 0.75(0.55 ~ 1.08) | ||
Conditional logistic regression is adopted for data analysis. Correction factors of multiple factors analysis.
Interactive Analysis of Gender and Tea Drinking.
| Variable | Female (n= 322) | Male (n=113) | Interactive analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(95%CI) | p-Value | OR(95%CI) | p-Value | p-Value | |
| Tea drinking habits | 0.621 | 0.110 | 0.417 | ||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 0.95(0.69~1.37) | 0.52(0.23~1.17) | |||
| Cumulative year of tea drinking | 0.693 | 0.435 | 0.946 | ||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| ≤20y | 1.06(0.72~1.60) | 0.21(0.07~0.67) | |||
| >20y | 0.87(0.52~1.47) | 0.69(0.28~1.67) | |||
| Average time per week | 0.602 | 0.346 | 0.575 | ||
| 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 1-6 | 1.26(0.72~1.77) | 0.32(0.12~0.87) | |||
| ≥7 | 0.85(0.62~1.47) | 0.82(0.32~2.57) | |||
| Average time per week | 0.502 | 0.053 | 0.343 | ||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| ≤median | 1.26(0.72~1.77) | 0.62(0.72~1.46) | |||
| >median | 0.85(0.62~1.41) | 0.42(0.72~1.17) | |||
| Cumulative amount of tea | 0.673 | 0.463 | 0.953 | ||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| ≤median(13.5kg) | 1.16(0.72~1.77) | 0.31(0.12~0.77) | |||
| >median(13.5kg) | 0.85(0.62~1.37) | 0.72(0.32~1.82) | |||
| Tea categories | 0.423 | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Green tea | 0.96(0.72~1.82) | 0.51(0.31~0.90) | |||
| Black tea | 0.93(0.60~1.44) | 0.45(0.22~0.93) | |||
| Oolong tea | 1.05(0.55~2.07) | 0.40(0.14~1.07) | |||
| Tea concentration | 0.775 | 0.243 | 0.467 | ||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Low dose | 0.91(0.55~1.42) | 0.32(0.12~1.07) | |||
| Medium and High dose | 0.96(0.67~1.77) | 0.62(0.25~1.62) | |||
paired t test (continuous variables) and paired χ2 test (classification variables) are adopted for comparison of the two groups.