| Literature DB >> 35509614 |
Marília Manuppella Tavares1, Milene Ferro2, Bárbara Simões Santos Leal1, Clarisse Palma-Silva1.
Abstract
The study of mechanisms that generate new species is considered fundamental for broad areas of ecology and evolution. Speciation is a continuous process in which reproductive isolation is established, and it is of fundamental importance to understand the origins of the adaptations that contribute to this process. Hybrid zones are considered natural laboratories for the study of speciation and represent ideal systems for such studies. Here, we investigated genomic differentiation between hybridizing Neotropical species Pitcairnia staminea (G. Lodd.) and P. albiflos (Herb.). Using thousands of SNPs genotyped through RAD-seq, we estimate effective population sizes, interspecific gene flow, as well as time of divergence between these two sister species and identify candidate genomic regions for positive selection that may be related to reproductive isolation. We selected different scenarios of speciation and tested them by using approximate Bayesian computation (ABC); we found evidence of divergence with gradual reduction in gene flow between these species over time, compatible with the hypothesis of speciation with gene flow between these Pitcairnia species. The parameter estimates obtained through ABC suggested that the effective population size of P. albiflos was around three times larger than that of P. staminea. Our divergence date estimates showed that these two species diverged during the Pliocene (4.7 Mya; CI = 1.3-8.5 Mya), which has likely allowed this species to accumulate genome-wide differences. We also detected a total of 17 of 4165 loci which showed signatures of selection with high genetic differentiation (F ST > 0.85), 12 of these loci were annotated in de novo assembled transcriptomes of both species, and 4 candidate genes were identified to be putatively involved in reproductive isolation. These four candidate genes were previously associated with the function of pollen development, pollen tube germination and orientation, abiotic stress, and flower scent in plants, suggesting an interplay between pre- and postpollination barriers in the evolution of reproductive isolation between such species.Entities:
Keywords: Bromeliaceae; NGS; divergent selection; hybridization; reproductive isolation; speciation with gene flow
Year: 2022 PMID: 35509614 PMCID: PMC9055293 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 3.167
FIGURE 1Summary of datasets obtained from de novo assembly of 24 samples of Pitcairnia albiflos and Pitcairnia staminea. Step 1: Assembly: Mindepth statistical: the minimum depth at which statistical base calls will be made during consensus base calling. Step 2: filtering of missing data and biallelic SNPs. Step 3: pick up one random SNP per locus. Step 4: removal of outliers loci detected by PCAdapt analysis. The software used are in parentheses, posterior analyses of each dataset are in italic and the names of each dataset are in bold
FIGURE 2Graphic representation of the simulated scenarios of divergence between Pitcairnia albiflos and Pitcairnia staminea tested using Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) framework, with estimated posterior probabilities based on 5000 retained simulations using data transformed by Principal Component Analysis and the neural network algorithm. T2: divergence time; T1: time for cessation of gene flow in old migration model, initiation of migration in the secondary contact model and change of migration rates in the isolation with decreased migration model
Ranges of priors used to generate the parameters in the msABC simulations for the divergence scenarios between Pitcairnia albiflos (alb) and Pitcairnia staminea (sta)
| Parameter | Prior settings | Parameters estimations based on Scenario V | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | Scenario | Mean | CI | |
| N0 | 104 | All | – | |
| NE alb | 10–105 | All | 16,673 | 4981–34,503 |
| NE sta | 10–105 | All | 5906 | 1634–13,598 |
| Divergence time | 0.5–10 Mya | All | 4.7 Mya | 1.3–8.5 Mya |
| Old mig alb → sta | 10−3–1 | II, III, and V | 0.47 | 0.04–0.86 |
| Old Tmig alb → sta | 0.25–0.5 Mya | III and V | 0.95 Mya | 0.696–1.210 Mya |
| Old mig sta → alb | 10−3–1 | II, III. and V | 0.5 | 0.03–0.96 |
| Old Tmig sta → alb | 0.25–0.5 Mya | III and V | 0.518 Mya | 0.350–0.684 Mya |
| Mig alb → sta | 10−5–10−2 (10−6–10−3) | II, IV, and V | 4 × 10−4 | 9.8 × 10−6–8.7 × 10−4 |
| Tmig alb → sta | 0–0.25 Mya | V | 0.016 Mya | 0.004–0.025 Mya |
| Mig sta → alb | 10−5–10−2 (10−6–10−3) | II, IV, and V | 1.5 × 10−4 | 9 × 10−6–3 × 10−4 |
| Tmig sta → alb | 0–0.25 Mya | V | 0.247 Mya | 0.063–0.466 Mya |
Models are described in Figure 2. Model I: isolation with no migration; Model II: isolation with migration; Model III: isolation with old migration; Model IV: secondary contact; Model V: isolation with decreased migration. For all simulations, the parameters were sampled from the uniform distribution within their respective ranges. Posterior parameters estimation with neural network (neuralnet) method from 5000 simulations under best model (scenario V – isolation with decreased migration) in an approximate Bayesian computation framework.
Abbreviations: alb, P. albiflos population; CI, confidence interval; Mig, migration rate; N0, ancestral effective population size; NE, effective population size; sta, P. staminea population; Tmig, time of migration.
Prior range applied only for scenario V.
Annotated putative sequences under positive selection
| Transcript name | RNA‐seq | RAD‐seq | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blast annotated function | Trascriptome length (bp) | Ka/Ks values (>1) |
| |
| TRINITY_DN10315_c1_g1_i1_alb | Pentatricopeptide repeat‐containing protein At5g64320 | 3200 | 50.000 | 1.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TRINITY_DN26945_c0_g1_i1_alb | Threonine dehydratase biosynthetic, chloroplastic | 2395 | 50.000 | 1.000 |
| TRINITY_DN27700_c3_g4_i1_alb | QWRF motif‐containing protein 3 | 600 | 50.000 | 0.863 |
| TRINITY_DN24641_c0_g1_i4_alb | 1,2‐dihydroxy‐3‐keto‐5‐methylthiopentene dioxygenase 2 | 1170 | 50.000 | 0.870 |
| TRINITY_DN27700_c3_g4_i1_alb | QWRF motif‐containing protein 3 | 600 | 50.000 | 0.870 |
| TRINITY_DN33538_c0_g2_i1_alb | Subtilisin‐like protease SBT2.6 | 587 | 47.926 | 0.870 |
| TRINITY_DN27581_c2_g1_i1_alb | Clathrin light‐chain 2‐like | 1284 | 1.046 | 0.909 |
| TRINITY_DN33021_c0_g1_i1_alb | Uncharacterized protein LOC109706678 isoform X2 | 272 | 1.064 | 0.862 |
| TRINITY_DN10315_c1_g1_i1_alb | NA | 693 | 50.000 | 1.000 |
| TRINITY_DN17090_c0_g1_i1_alb | NA | 579 | 1.230 | 1.000 |
| TRINITY_DN28956_c1_g2_i3_alb | NA | 480 | 46.590 | 1.000 |
| NA | 920 | 50.000 | 1.000 | |
Transcripts under positive selection in the Ka/Ks analysis and with F ST values between species higher than 0.85. Transcript name, Blast description, transcriptome length, and Ka/Ks ratios of each transcript, and F ST of the corresponding RAD loci. In bold are genes under positive selection with putative function in reproductive isolation between Pitcairnia albiflos and Pitcairnia staminea.