| Literature DB >> 30744548 |
Qi Xu1,2,3, Songtai Wang1,2, Huazhu Hong1,2, Yin Zhou4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cymbidium faberi, one of the most famous oriental orchids, has a distinct flower scent, which increases its economic value. However, the molecular mechanism of the flower scent biosynthesis was unclear prior to this study. Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) is one of the main volatile organic compounds (VOC) produced by the flowers of C. faberi. In this study, unigene 79,363 from comparative transcriptome analysis was selected for further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: Flower fragrance; Jasmonic acid carboxyl methyltransferase (JMT); Oriental orchids; Transcriptome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30744548 PMCID: PMC6371524 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5501-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1GO classification of Cymbidium faberi unigenes
Fig. 2Functional classification and pathway assignment of assembled unigenes according to the KEGG database
Fig. 3Analysis of the most enriched KEGG pathways corresponding to the DEGs between the blooming and withered flower samples of Cymbidium faberi
Summary of DEGs up- and down- regulated in the blooming flower sample compared to the withered flower sample of Cymbidium faberi related to MeJA metabolism according to the KEGG database
| Pathway type | KEGG ID | # of DEGs | Up/Down (# of genes) | Unigene ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-linolenic acid metabolism | ko00592 | 11 | 10 Up | 61,467; 20,941; 56,582; 3534; 69,403; 60,497; 28,969; 47,102; 51,380; 81,132 |
| 1 down | 29,317 | |||
| Fatty acid degradation | ko00071 | 10 | 7 Up | 56,582; 3534; 69,403; 67,030; 28,969; 47,102; 51,380 |
| 3 Down | 2730; 77,699; 35,801 |
Summary of key enzymes and proteins related to MeJA metabolism in Cymbidium faberi
| Gene ID | Log2Fold Change | Annotation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 79,363 | −2.97 | 8.53E-69 | Jasmonic acid carboxyl methyltransferase |
| 82,057 | −5.54 | 1.19E-76 | Allene oxide synthase |
| 20,941 | −2.55 | 1.18E-52 | Allene oxide synthase |
| 31,970 | −4.28 | 7.11E-168 | Allene oxide cyclase |
| 4670 | −5.99 | 1.67E-169 | Lipoxygenase |
| 54,500 | −3.75 | 1.81E-36 | Lipoxygenase |
| 70,202 | −3.4 | 0.009272813 | Lipoxygenase |
| 49,325 | −1.4 | 9.38E-11 | Lipoxygenase |
| 63,843 | −1.29 | 7.00E-12 | Lipoxygenase |
| 20,155 | −6.01 | 5.54E-295 | Lipoxygenase |
| 54,798 | 6.93 | 3.14E-67 | Lipoxygenase |
| 56,582 | −1.99 | 1.18E-42 | Acyl-coenzyme A oxidase |
| 4747 | −1.3 | 0.001057461 | Acyl-coenzyme A oxidase |
| 28,969 | −1.56 | 6.43E-23 | Acyl-coenzyme A oxidase |
| 60,497 | −2.13 | 3.12E-28 | 12-oxophytodienoate reductase |
| 47,102 | −1.69 | 2.11E-12 | Alcohol dehydrogenase |
| 2730 | 4.09 | 4.43E-16 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase |
| 3534 | −4.9 | 7.52E-36 | Peroxisomal fatty acid β-oxidation multifunctional protein |
| 69,403 | −4.83 | 7.52E-36 | Peroxisomal fatty acid β-oxidation multifunctional protein |
| 29,317 | 3.26 | 1.07E-09 | Triacylglycerol lipase SDP1 |
| 81,132 | −6.05 | 4.39E-06 | Anthranilate O-methyltransferase 3-like |
| 67,030 | −1.97 | 5.36E-33 | Probable acyl-CoA dehydrogenase IBR3 |
| 77,699 | 3.92 | 3.21E-14 | Long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase |
| 35,801 | 3.83 | 2.46E-13 | Long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase |
Log2 Fold Change = Log2 (S2-RPKM/S1-RPKM)
Fig. 4Distribution of differentially expressed transcription factors according to families
Fig. 5Up- and down-regulated TFs in the blooming flower sample compared to the withered flower sample of Cymbidium faberi
Fig. 6qRT-PCR validation of differential expressed unigenes. a. The expression of nine randomly selected unigenes was analyzed by qRT-PCR. The data represent the means and standard errors from three biological replicates. b. Correlation analysis of the gene expression ratios calculated from the qRT-PCR and RNA-seq data. The qRT-PCR log2 values (y-axis) were plotted against the RNA-seq log2 values (x-axis). The asterisks on the correlation coefficient (R) indicates the highly significant difference at P <0.01
Fig. 7Homology analysis of selected plant JMT proteins
Cis-acting elements in the CfJMT promoter predicted by PlantCARE
| Site name | Organism | Position | Strand |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAGAA-motif |
| 1205 | – |
| AAGAA-motif |
| 1353 | – |
| ABRE |
| 547 | + |
| ABRE |
| 1493 | – |
| ARE |
| 1420 | – |
| ARE |
| 1459 | – |
| AuxRR-core |
| 166 | – |
| Box 4 |
| 1377 | – |
| Box 4 |
| 1385 | – |
| Box I |
| 1123 | + |
| Box III |
| 301 | + |
| Box-w1 |
| 1080 | – |
| C-box |
| 215 | + |
| CGTCA-motif |
| 394 | + |
| EIRE |
| 1487 | + |
| ERE |
| 1122 | + |
| G-BOX |
| 547 | – |
| G-BOX |
| 1493 | – |
| G-BOX |
| 1088 | – |
| G-BOX |
| 547 | + |
| G-BOX |
| 1492 | – |
| G-BOX |
| 1088 | – |
| G-BOX |
| 1493 | – |
| GARE-motif |
| 235 | + |
| GC-motif |
| 500 | – |
| GT1-motif |
| 753 | + |
| GT1-motif |
| 1346 | + |
| Gap-box |
| 1440 | – |
| Gap-box |
| 1479 | – |
| HSE |
| 818 | – |
| HSE |
| 1349 | – |
| HSE |
| 1304 | + |
| I-box |
| 1261 | + |
| LTR |
| 105 | – |
| LTR |
| 908 | – |
| MBS |
| 277 | – |
| MBSI |
| 1339 | + |
| O2-site |
| 118 | + |
| Skn-1 motif |
| 395 | + |
| Skn-1 motif |
| 405 | – |
| Sp1 |
| 312 | + |
| TATCCAT/C-motif |
| 208 | – |
| TC-rich repeats |
| 934 | – |
| TGACG-motif |
| 394 | – |
| TGGCA-motif |
| 352 | + |
| W box |
| 1080 | – |
Fig. 8The spatio-temporal expression pattern of CfJMT gene in Cymbidium faberi as determined by qRT-PCR. Flower 1: flower bud stage; Flower 2: blooming stage; Flower 3: withered stage. The data represent the means and standard errors from three biological replicates
Fig. 9The transcription levels of genes related to MeJA biosynthesis in transgenic CfJMT-overexpressing and wild-type (WT) tomato plants that underwent mechanical wounding. The data represent the means and standard errors from three biological replicates. MeJA: methyl jasmonate
Fig. 10The main metabolic pathways and related unigenes in flower scent biosynthesis of Cymbidium faberi based on the KEGG analysis. a. α-linolenic acid metabolism pathway; b. A long-chain alkane biosynthetic pathway; c. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation pathway. The full lines represented the validated metabolic reactions and the dotted lines represented the predicted metabolic reactions