| Literature DB >> 35497432 |
Geetika Wadhwa1, Kowthavarapu Venkata Krishna1, Rajeev Taliyan1, Neeraj Tandon2, Satyapal Singh Yadav3, Chandrakant Katiyar4, Sunil Kumar Dubey1.
Abstract
A reliable and sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based method has been developed for the estimation of 4-hydroxyisoleucine (4-HI), a potent insulinotropic and hypolipidemic agent. The extraction of 4-HI from plasma was accomplished by the protein precipitation technique using l-isoleucine as an internal standard. The separation of analytes was achieved with a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid in an isocratic flow system on a BEH Shield RP-18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm). 4-HI and l-isoleucine were detected using an electrospray ionization (ESI) ion source, using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in positive ion mode. The precursor to product ion transitions of 4-HI and l-isoleucine were found at m/z values of 148.19 > 74.02 and 132.17 > 69.04, respectively. As per the guidelines for bioanalytical methods, all validation parameter results were within the acceptable range. The method exhibited a robust and reproducible linearity range of 1-5000 ng mL-1 with a coefficient of regression of 0.9999. The method was successfully applied for the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters after oral administration of 4-HI (10 mg kg-1) in Wistar rats, by using Thoth Pro (version: 4.3) software. Herein, the two-compartment model was statistically fitted based on AIC and SBC values for evaluation of the pharmacokinetic parameters of 4-HI. Pharmacodynamic studies were also performed by measuring the levels of triglyceride and total cholesterol, and showed that the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of 4-HI correlated with each other. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35497432 PMCID: PMC9049328 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra08121f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Ion transitions and other optimized parameters for 4-hydroxyisoleucine and l-isoleucine
| Compound name | Ion transition | Cone voltage (eV) | Collision energy (eV) | Acquisition time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-Hydroxyisoleucine | 148.19 > 74.02 | 24 | 12 | 0.92 |
|
| 132.17 > 69.04 | 24 | 12 | 0.96 |
Fig. 1Product ion scan mass spectra of 4-hydroxyisoleucine and l-isoleucine.
Fig. 2Representative MRM chromatograms of 4-HI: (a) blank; (b) IS; (c) LLOQ; (d) sample.
Precision and accuracy of the analysis of 4-hydroxyisoleucine in rat plasma
| Level | Nominal concentration (ng mL−1) | Inter-day | Intra-day | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured concentration (mean ± SD, ng mL−1) | Precision (% CV) | Accuracy (% bias) | Measured concentration (mean ± SD, ng mL−1) | Precision (% CV) | Accuracy (% bias) | ||
| LLOQ | 1 | 1.00 ± 0.12 | 11.660 | 0.263 | 0.98 ± 0.10 | 9.876 | −1.733 |
| LQC | 2 | 2.02 ± 0.14 | 7.116 | 0.808 | 1.94 ± 0.13 | 6.768 | −2.798 |
| MQC | 1500 | 1370.29 ± 46.64 | 3.406 | −8.647 | 1325.51 ± 37.23 | 2.809 | −11.633 |
| HQC | 4000 | 3716.68 ± 171.74 | 4.621 | −7.083 | 3755.09 ± 138.91 | 3.699 | −6.123 |
Recovery (%) of 4-hydroxyisoleucine in rat plasma at different QC levels
| Level | Nominal concentration (ng mL−1) | % Recovery | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | % CV | ||
| LLOQ | 1 | 41.35 ± 2.69 | 6.515 |
| LQC | 2 | 40.32 ± 0.89 | 2.213 |
| MQC | 1500 | 41.99 ± 1.35 | 3.204 |
| HQC | 4000 | 42.55 ± 2.46 | 5.791 |
Stability of 4-hydroxyisoleucine in rat plasma under different storage conditions and at different QC levels
| Stability | Nominal concentration (ng mL−1) | Measured concentration (ng mL−1 ± SD) | Precision (% CV) | Accuracy (% bias) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autosampler (24 h) | 1 | 1.02 ± 0.06 | 5.588 | 1.892 |
| 2 | 1.96 ± 0.17 | 8.627 | −1.951 | |
| 1500 | 1499.41 ± 14.62 | 0.975 | −0.040 | |
| 4000 | 3902.95 ± 187.10 | 4.794 | −2.426 | |
| Bench top (9 h) | 1 | 1.09 ± 0.11 | 9.908 | 8.838 |
| 2 | 1.96 ± 0.13 | 6.814 | −2.003 | |
| 1500 | 1502.65 ± 31.68 | 2.108 | 0.176 | |
| 4000 | 3894.00 ± 227.47 | 5.842 | −2.650 | |
| Freeze–thaw (−80 °C) | 1 | 1.05 ± 0.13 | 12.674 | 5.271 |
| 2 | 2.01 ± 0.18 | 9.133 | 0.497 | |
| 1500 | 1417.04 ± 40.97 | 2.891 | −5.531 | |
| 4000 | 3751.70 ± 138.34 | 3.873 | −10.707 |
Fig. 3Plasma concentration–time profile of 4-HI after oral administration (10 mg kg−1, p.o.).
Non-compartmental and compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters of 4-hydroxyisoleucine after administration at a dose of 10 mg kg−1 p.o. in rats
| Parameters | 4-Hydroxyisoleucine (10 mg kg−1; p.o.) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-compartmental | One-compartmental | Two-compartmental | ||
|
| ng mL−1 | 8140.37 ± 623.48 | 4101.04 ± 540.10 | 8042.97 ± 279.16 |
| AUC0− | ng h mL−1 | 39 034.76 ± 1345.06 | 39 495.34 ± 1290.42 | 40 016.39 ± 1547.58 |
| AUC0− | ng h mL−1 | 45 892.54 ± 702.92 | 46 353.11 ± 788.01 | 47 050.02 ± 1223.01 |
|
| h−1 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 |
|
| h | 0.5 ± 0.00 | — | — |
|
| h | — | — | 17.470 ± 12.73 |
|
| h | — | — | 0.021 ± 0.010 |
|
| h | 10.83 ± 1.96 | — | — |
| CL | mL h−1 kg−1 | 204.95 ± 23.97 | 32.372 ± 6.88 | 17.412 ± 7.71 |
|
| mL kg−1 | 3123.59 ± 355.86 | — | — |
|
| mL kg−1 | — | 679.546 ± 20.22 | 309.492 ± 162.89 |
|
| mL kg−1 | — | — | 569.144 ± 82.93 |
|
| h−1 | — | 0.0483 ± 0.01 | 0.149 ± 0.01 |
|
| h−1 | — | — | 0.08 ± 0.05 |
|
| h−1 | — | — | 0.12 ± 0.00 |
|
| — | — | 0.947 ± 0.04 | 0.997 ± 0.00 |
| AIC | — | — | 162.99 ± 2.37 | 156.52 ± 2.50 |
| SBC | — | — | 164.14 ± 2.37 | 158.34 ± 2.50 |
Fig. 4Schematic representation of the two-compartmental model for 4-HI. Where Ke: 4-HI absorption in the gastrointestinal tract; K12: 4-HI disposition from the central compartment to the peripheral compartment; K21: reabsorption from the peripheral compartment to the central compartment; K10: 4-HI elimination from the central compartment.
Fig. 5Plasma concentration–time profile of 4-HI obtained using the two-compartment model after oral administration (10 mg kg−1).
Fig. 6Change in triglyceride level after the administration of 4-HI in normal Wistar rats. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Fig. 7Change in total cholesterol level after the administration of 4-HI in normal Wistar rats. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.