| Literature DB >> 35488035 |
Sebastian Stannard1,2, Ann Berrington3,4, Nisreen A Alwan5,6,7.
Abstract
Social life course determinants of adult hypertension are relatively unknown. This paper examines how parental separation before age 10 relates to hypertension at age 46. Adjusting for parental confounders and considering the role of adult mediators, we aim to quantify unexplored mediating pathways in childhood using prospectively collected data. Data from the 1970 British Birth Cohort Study are utilised. Hypertension is measured by health care professionals at age 46. Potential mediating pathways in childhood include body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, illness, disability, family socioeconomic status (SES) and cognitive and developmental indicators at age 10. Additionally, we explore to what extent childhood mediators operate through adult mediators, including health behaviours, family SES, BMI and mental wellbeing. We also test for effect modification of the relationship between parental separation and hypertension by gender. Nested logistic regression models test the significance of potential mediating variables. Formal mediation analysis utilising Karlson Holm and Breen (KHB) method quantify the direct and indirect effect of parental separation on offspring hypertension at midlife. There was an association between parental separation and hypertension in mid-life in women but not men. For women, family SES and cognitive and behavioural development indicators at age 10 partly mediate the relationship between parental separation and hypertension at age 46. When adult mediators including, health behaviours, family SES, BMI and mental wellbeing are included, the associations between the childhood predictors and adult hypertension are attenuated, suggesting that these childhood mediators in turn may work through adult mediators to affect the risk of hypertension in midlife. We found family SES in childhood, cognitive and behaviour development indicators at age 10, including disruptive behaviour, coordination and locus of control in childhood, to be important mediators of the relationship between parental separation and midlife hypertension suggesting that intervening in childhood may modify adult hypertension risk.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35488035 PMCID: PMC9054745 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11007-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Analytical framework and study variables from the 1970 British Cohort Study.
Sample characteristics by hypertension status at age 46 and gender.
| Overall sample | Men | Women | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No hypertension | Hypertension | No hypertension | Hypertension | No hypertension | Hypertension | |
| Total | 6560 (76.6%) | 2012 (23.4%) | 2716 (71.1%) | 1103 (28.9%) | 3377 (81.7%) | 755 (18.27%) |
| No | 4974 (76.9%) | 1497 (23.1%) | 2082 (70.7%) | 865 (29.3%) | 2637 (82.8%) | 547 (17.2%) |
| Yes | 727 (74.2%) | 253 (25.8%) | 285 (71.0%) | 116 (29.0%) | 364 (76.1%) | 114 (23.9%) |
| Child BMI mean (SD) | 16.8 (2.0) | 17.1 (2.2) | 16.7 (1.9) | 16.9 (2.0) | 16.9 (2.1) | 17.4 (2.4) |
| Child SBP mean (SD) | 97.3 (10.8) | 99.9 (11.2) | 97.3 (10.8) | 100.1 (10.8) | 97.4 (10.8) | 99.8 (11.7) |
| Child DBP mean (SD) | 61.9 (9.2) | 63.9 (9.2) | 62.1 (9.2) | 63.9 (9.1) | 61.7 (9.0) | 64.1 (9.2) |
| Illness or disability | ||||||
| No | 4179 (77.3%) | 1227 (22.7%) | 1674 (70.1%) | 684 (29.0%) | 2259 (82.8%) | 471 (17.2%) |
| Yes | 1438 (74.3%) | 497 (25.7%) | 666 (70.6%) | 277 (29.4%) | 695 (79.1%) | 184 (20.9%) |
| Coordination | ||||||
| Normal | 4816 (77.2%) | 1426 (22.9%) | 1901 (71.0%) | 776 (29.0%) | 2632 (82.5%) | 560 (17.5%) |
| Poor | 661 (73.1%) | 243 (26.9%) | 383 (70.7%) | 159 (29.3%) | 246 (77.4%) | 72 (22.6%) |
| Rutter behaviour | ||||||
| Normal | 4460 (77.4%) | 1301 (22.6%) | 1792 (70.9%) | 734 (29.1%) | 2414 (83.2%) | 489 (16.8%) |
| Poor/severe | 948 (74.2%) | 330 (25.8%) | 461 (72.1%) | 178 (27.9%) | 421 (77.7%) | 128 (23.3%) |
| Locus mean (SD) | 5.8 (2.3) | 6.0 (2.4) | 5.7 (2.4) | 5.8 (2.4) | 5.8 (2.3) | 6.2 (2.3) |
| Cognition mean (SD) | 88.6 (22.3) | 85.5 (22.4) | 88.5 (23.6) | 86.4 (22.9) | 88.7 (21.3) | 84.2 (21.6) |
| No deprivation | 4304 (77.3%) | 1262 (22.7%) | 1792 (71.3%) | 723 (28.7%) | 2262 (83.2%) | 458 (16.8%) |
| Deprived | 1402 (74.1%) | 490 (25.9%) | 580 (69.2%) | 258 (30.8%) | 740 (78.3%) | 205 (21.7%) |
| Highest academic achievement | ||||||
| GCSE and below | 3442 (74.6%) | 1171 (25.4%) | 1416 (69.2%) | 629 (30.8%) | 1813 (79.6%) | 464 (20.4%) |
| A level and above | 2226 (79.9%) | 561 (20.1%) | 864 (73.4%) | 313 (26.6%) | 1195 (85.8%) | 197 (14.2%) |
| Financial difficulty | ||||||
| No difficulty | 5601 (77.1%) | 1661 (22.9%) | 2330 (72.1%) | 904 (28.9%) | 2878 (82.1%) | 626 (17.9%) |
| Financial difficulty | 479 (72.4%) | 183 (27.6%) | 161 (63.1%) | 94 (36.9%) | 280 (78.7%) | 76 (21.3%) |
| Unemployment | ||||||
| No unemployment | 5810 (77.1%) | 1724 (22.9%) | 2368 (71.8%) | 930 (28.2%) | 3031 (82.2%) | 657 (17.8%) |
| Unemployed | 270 (69.2%) | 120 (30.8%) | 123 (64.4%) | 68 (35.6%) | 127 (73.8%) | 45 (26.1%) |
| Age at first birth | ||||||
| 24 and under | 1204 (73.9%) | 425 (26.1%) | 341 (70.0%) | 168 (33.0%) | 773 (77.7%) | 222 (22.3%) |
| 25–29 | 1417 (76.5%) | 436 (23.5%) | 554 (71.2%) | 224 (28.8%) | 771 (82.0%) | 169 (18.0%) |
| 30 and over | 2125 (80.4%) | 519 (19.6%) | 955 (74.3%) | 331 (25.7%) | 1018 (86.8%) | 155 (13.2%) |
| Childless | 1290 (74.3%) | 446 (25.7%) | 614 (69.7%) | 267 (30.3%) | 581 (79.8%) | 147 (20.1%) |
| Smoking | ||||||
| Never smoked/ex-smoker | 4659 (77.1%) | 1380 (22.9%) | 1866 (71.3%) | 751 (28.7%) | 2474 (82.6%) | 520 (17.4%) |
| Smoker | 1421 (75.4%) | 464 (24.6%) | 625 (71.7%) | 247 (28.3%) | 684 (79.0%) | 182 (21.0%) |
| Exercise | ||||||
| Rarely | 1566 (74.1%) | 547 (25.9%) | 621 (68.3%) | 288 (31.7%) | 838 (78.9%) | 224 (21.1%) |
| Occasionally | 3139 (77.2%) | 925 (22.8%) | 1312 (71.1%) | 533 (28.9%) | 1610 (83.5%) | 318 (16.5%) |
| Frequently | 963 (78.7%) | 260 (21.3%) | 347 (74.2%) | 121 (25.8%) | 560 (82.5%) | 119 (17.5%) |
| Alcohol intake | ||||||
| Rarely | 2856 (77.3%) | 838 (22.7%) | 986 (72.1%) | 382 (27.9%) | 1653 (80.8%) | 392 (19.2%) |
| Occasionally | 1718 (79.0%) | 457 (21.0%) | 754 (74.1%) | 263 (25.9%) | 862 (84.4%) | 159 (15.6%) |
| Frequently | 846 (72.6%) | 320 (27.4%) | 441 (67.6%) | 211 (32.4%) | 352 (80.5%) | 85 (19.5%) |
| WEMWBS mean (SD) | 49.7 (8.1) | 48.9 (8.3) | 49.6 (7.8) | 49.2 (8.0) | 49.8 (8.3) | 48.4 (8.6) |
| BMI | ||||||
| Normal | 2540 (86.7%) | 390 (13.3%) | 774 (79.4%) | 201 (20.6%) | 1588 (90.6%) | 164 (9.4%) |
| Overweight | 2056 (76.0%) | 650 (24.0%) | 1104 (73.2%) | 404 (26.8%) | 807 (80.9%) | 190 (19.1%) |
| Obese | 1484 (64.9%) | 804 (35.1%) | 613 (60.9%) | 393 (39.1%) | 763 (68.7%) | 348 (31.3%) |
Odds ratios of hypertension according to whether or not the cohort member had experienced parental separation.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Sample size | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted | (+) Controls at birth1 | (+) Child physical health indicators2 | (+) Child cognitive and behavioural indicators3 | (+) Family SES4 | (+) Adult mediators5 | ||||||||||||||
| Odds ratio | 95% CI | P value | Odds ratio | 95% CI | P value | Odds ratio | 95% CI | P value | Odds ratio | 95% CI | P value | Odds ratio | 95% CI | P value | Odds ratio | 95% CI | P value | ||
| Both genders | 1.237 | 0.970, 1.577 | 0.086 | 1.185 | 0.929, 1.517 | 0.178 | 1.189 | 0.925, 1.526 | 0.176 | 1.174 | 0.910, 1.515 | 0.216 | 1.149 | 0.888, 1.488 | 0.289 | 1.100 | 0.841, 1.444 | 0.483 | 3615 |
| Men | 0.870 | 0.606, 1.250 | 0.452 | 0.871 | 0.602, 1.259 | 0.462 | 0.846 | 0.582, 1.230 | 0.382 | 0.880 | 0.603, 1.285 | 0.509 | 0.866 | 0.589, 1.271 | 0.463 | 0.858 | 0.575, 1.282 | 0.457 | 1637 |
| Women | 1.392 | 0.958, 2.023 | 0.082 | 1978 | |||||||||||||||
Base outcome: No hypertension. Reference: No parental separation.
Odds ratios with p < 0.05 are in bold.
1Father’s social class, maternal age, parental education, maternal smoking, birthweight.
2SBP, DBP, BMI, illness or disability.
3Coordination, child cognition, Locus of control, Rutter behaviour, coordination.
4Household income under £35 per week and/or child receiving free school meals and/or house affected by damp.
5Age at first birth, Highest education achievement, financial difficulty, unemployment, Smoking, exercise, alcohol intake, BMI, WEMWBS.
Figure 2KHB analysis of the association between parental separation and hypertension at midlife. The percentage reflects the share of the contribution of each of the mediators towards the total effect of the association between parental separation and offspring hypertension. The positive (larger) percentage, the greater the share attributed to the specific mediator. A negative percentage value suggests that the mediator contributed negatively towards the total effect. This may be because the mediator is inversely related, or not associated to, either parental separation or hypertension.
Figure 3KHB analysis of the association between parental separation and hypertension at midlife, including adult mediators of hypertension. The percentage reflects the share of the contribution of each of the mediators towards the total effect of the association between parental separation and offspring hypertension. The positive (larger) percentage, the greater the share attributed to the specific mediator. A negative percentage value suggests that the mediator contributed negatively towards the total effect. This may be because the mediator is inversely related, or not associated to, either parental separation or hypertension.